My two cents regarding volunteers and organizing team:
Just as others, I did spend lots of time in the organization of Wikimania,
mostly in recruitment, training and logistics of the Yellow Army, and in
many other small things helping Ivan, Carmen and the rest of the organizing
team. As we
hi Ivan,
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Ivan Martínez wrote:
> Darius, I think that "motivations criris afterward" must also be
> considered in the planning and prior call for Wikimanía volunteers and can
> be avoided. In Mexico we always tell to people that we did not
I had a bit of the same problem, but with people making disparaging
jokes about Trump. I think it's an important thing for people to
remember that even as we come together in this movement, our politics
are not necessarily the same as other folks, and making hostile comments
in any direction
Dear Deryck,
there's a good deal of reasons why there's an etiquette rule in Italy
that states "don't talk about politics at the dinner table". :)
I'm sorry if you felt excluded by us EU citizens, especially by those
(as I am) who deeply care about the future of the EU. If it can be of
any good,
It's a lot of work, last week before Wikimania Mexico the coordination team
slept less than 4 hours each day. But for me being honest was not a shaming
time, was great. And we can have people intended to keep Wikimania annual
and run similar challenges.
Harry, we had here 72 committed volunteers
Yes, London was big, and the two Wikimaniae since have been on a smaller
scale, but I'm not sure a ~1,000-person conference is significantly less of
a headache than a ~2,000-person conference, and actually I'd wager that
Esino was more logistically complicated due to the location - for example
Thanks Harry, Ed,
Of course London was a bit of an exceptionally big Wikimania - but did you
evaluate your effort somewhere, and note what you spent your time on
somewhere? Just to get an impression which components take most effort (as
Dariusz suggested)?
Best,
Lodewijk
2016-07-10 20:25
I agree with Ed here. Organising a conference of this size is a huge
undertaking to ask of volunteers. I wouldn't want to see Wikimania go down
the road of being organised by a team of professional conference organisers
because then it would lose the organic community feel that makes it so
Thanks for that comment, Dariusz;
Wikimania London took over two years of preparation, and occupied me full
time for six months in the run up to the event. It's a massive undertaking,
and in retrospect it seems deeply unfair to expect volunteers to do this.
There was a bidding process, so there
Hi,
I think that switching to regional conferences model will not reduce but
increase local organisers involvement. In fact, any conference means that local
organisers must arrange: * Programme (either local organisers manage themselves
or they have to set up and work with an international
Regional events work where there are strong cultural ties between countries
and where there are a lot of strong local communities, but they fail
abysmally when that isnt there. So for Europe and North America thats
always going to work maybe it'll work for South/Central America even
possibly
my two cents (please, forgive me if I'm stating the obvious, or if I'm
repeating things that were said elsewhere or already addressed):
First, I don't think that an event every four years will have the
mobilizing and motivating role that an annual one does. Four years is
longer than a typical
One goal :) you always side effects.
If the goal is to be a community event why don't we don't we do a huge
event every 4 years where we fly in every single editors? Instead of doing
4 Wikimanias.
That is why setting expections and goal is key, so then we can make
decisions.
We're talking about
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Gnangarra wrote:
>
>> Is it a community event?
>
> Is it a knowledge sharing event?
> Is it an outreaching event?
>
>> Is it a way to reward people?
>>
>
> The answer to these four are yes
>
>- Yes its a community event, one that
Dear Deryck,
I'm terribly sorry that Brexit left a sour taste to your (and actually my)
involvement
Sent from my Sony Xperia™ smartphone
Deryck Chan wrote
>I apologise for the somewhat emotionally charged post. Please read to the
>end and I promise my argument will come together...
>
>
> Is it a community event?
Is it a knowledge sharing event?
Is it an outreaching event?
> Is it a way to reward people?
>
The answer to these four are yes
- Yes its a community event, one that brings people together and
empowers them
- Yes it where we share the lessons of our
Dear Deryck,
I'm terribly sorry that the recent events made your (and also my) experience of
wikimania left a slightly bitter taste.
Even we had our differences, I think we should strive to make the conference
inclusive, otherwise if one sort of correctness takes hold it's rather
unhelpful
Hey,
So, as with everything, Wikimania is going through a process where we (as à
group) will define if it pushes our mission forward or not.
First, WMF staff working so we can have the discussion with all the cards
in our hands. Which is not the case now.
Second, what is Wikimania purposes?
18 matches
Mail list logo