Dear all,
Since this thread has gone so long, let me take a bit more freedom to
intervene yet another time:
I said I am sad for my name was (perhaps) unnecessarily dragged into the
list. But I have not felt a bit, even for a moment, that Praveen intended
any real harm or hurt for me. His
Thank you Kerry for perfect analysis. I had almost lost hope here. :-)
On Monday 22 May 2017 05:38 PM, Isaac Olatunde wrote:
Greetings,
I want to agree with Gnangara that the OP has no intention to attack
the user who was cited as an example. Saying User:XYZ received a
scholarship
Hi,
For my part I chaired Wikimania Scholarships for 2015.
As Adrian points out, it's very competitive. But the idea that it is driven
by personal preferences and politics is an unfair accusation to make to the
volunteers that put in days of work as committee members.
Personally, I found some
Greetings,
I want to agree with Gnangara that the OP has no intention to attack the
user who was cited as an example. Saying User:XYZ received a scholarship
consecutively is not an attack but a statement of fact (if their claim was
actually correct). To be honest, interpreting OP's concern as an
Fair comment, and actionable suggestions.
P
From: Wikimania-l [mailto:wikimania-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of
Kerry Raymond
Sent: Monday, 22 May 2017 4:57 AM
To: 'Wikimania general list (open subscription)'
Subject: Re: [Wikimania-l] Granting Scholarship to same persons every
English isnt everyone first language if there had there been no name
mentioned the question would have been dismissed as nonsense. Tto quote the
original email "*This is not personal, I am just using personalities and
scholarships familiar to me" *this made it clear that it was not directed
at
I'm sorry, Pine, but I see no way to have a "civil discussion" when the
initiator makes it about one single other person. If the originator, after
having been redirected, had stuck to general comments instead of continuing
to complain about a single user receiving multiple scholarships, I'd have
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Risker wrote:
>
>
> On 21 May 2017 at 20:12, Pine W wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Risker wrote:
>>
>>> I'm sorry, Pinebut no. It's naming and shaming. If Praveen had
>>>