On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Geoffrey Plourde geo.p...@yahoo.comwrote:
As it stands, Montreal would appear to be the better place to put forward.
Unofficially this is the year for North America to receive the nod, so we
can't afford to have two or three competing bids. Montreal has several
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Gerald A geraldabli...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it's too early in the bidding process, at this point, to discount
any city.
I agree here. There's nothing wrong with working on two separate
bids, at least at this point. We can always re-evaluate this at a
later
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-Canada] Fwd: Montreal wikimania bid
Alan Walker wrote:
I will dance naked in the street if the Harper government gives a
penny towards this event. :)
This may turn out to be amusing, then. :-) I'll admit that Ottawa is
the least promising, and I wouldn't hold
2010 14:04:34 -0800
From: sainto...@telus.net
To: wikimedia-ca@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-Canada] Fwd: Montreal wikimania bid
Alan Walker wrote:
I vote for Toronto, the center of the universe. All joking aside,
wouldn't Ottawa be a better venue?
I think that a key
[resent from correct address]
From: Nicholas Moreau nicholasmor...@gmail.com
It could work either way, it could show Canada's really, really
interested, or that Canada's really, really not cohesive in its bid
planning.
Incidentally, whatever you guys decide, you are both welcome to help and
I will dance naked in the street if the Harper government gives a penny
towards this event. :)
2010/1/15 Marc A. Pelletier m...@wikimania.qc.ca
[resent from correct address]
From: Nicholas Moreau nicholasmor...@gmail.com
It could work either way, it could show Canada's really, really
