Rex,
I am a bit surprise by some of your utterances. When have there ever been a
situation whereby a decision has been made by the entire community?
Are you telling me that you are not aware or you haven't been part of a
situation whereby a decision has been taken by a select membership of the
Hello Rex, if I may intrude, I don't really get why you are making a big
issue of what is past and gone. If something wasn't done right and it is
now being corrected, why keep bringing up what is past and gone. I mean
it's not like Felix misrepresented the community. If you knew what Felix
did was
You see,
That is the issue. The conversation you pull below are from how many
members of the community? Were the comments shared as a final say on the
part of the community?
When did one, two or three members of the community's personal
recommendations start to represent the whole community?
In
That's I guess the report should be worked on so we can get someone to
represent us at the Conference.
Thank you
On 28 Nov 2016 11:05, "Sandister Tei" wrote:
> We became a usergroup in 2014 I think hence there's no past 'couple of
> years' but just 2015 in which Felix
We became a usergroup in 2014 I think hence there's no past 'couple of
years' but just 2015 in which Felix went.
This was what he sent to the group. There was no group discussion
necessarily.
Good Afternoon Guys,
I wish to inform you that am looking at representing the community here in
Thanks, Asaf,
That means the User Group has been doing it wrong for a couple of years,
and individuals who've represented this community at the WMCon weren't
picked by the community if I remember clear.
On the other hand, the WMCon team hasn't ensured those picked by the
community were