Apart from using a vandalized version of [[Pyramid]] and a graphically
horrendous capital I, there are some nice elements in a generally good
layout.
The key improvement needed (and WAP has made this evident to more
people) is to stop wasting real estate on more and more nested top bars
and
Richard Farmbrough, 08/16/2012 11:56 AM:
The key improvement needed (and WAP has made this evident to more
people) is to stop wasting real estate on more and more nested top bars
and side bars. Even with a modern 15.2 inch laptop many pages have
threir contents squeezed enough by the OS,
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 5:56 AM, Richard Farmbrough
rich...@farmbrough.co.uk wrote:
Apart from using a vandalized version of [[Pyramid]] and a graphically
horrendous capital I, there are some nice elements in a generally good
layout.
Looking at their screenshots, it seems as if that horrible
Never having been to design school like Amir, I can't comment on what grade
it might get. But I do like it a lot; I think it's a serious improvement
over what we use now, and incorporates design principles that we should
adopt even if we don't take the design itself. The visual elements, the
I personally think the Foundation should spend money and time on developing
a new interface like this.
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
Never having been to design school like Amir, I can't comment on what grade
it might get. But I do like it a lot; I think it's
