Hi Everyone,
2013 is an election year for the Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia
Foundation.
As you may recall the board has three directly elected representatives
on it which serve for two years. Currently those are Mindspillage, SJ
and Wing. As in the past years we rely on an effective
Keegan Peterzell wrote:
1. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/OTRS/Reports/2012
2. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/OTRS
Nice. Thanks for putting this together. :-)
MZMcBride
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
Glad to see the process is coming along :-)
Could you please clarify the purpose of one of the mandatory questions in
the form:
Hong Kong is an international gourmet paradise. Please use less than 200
words to describe your favourite dish of food.
Is this an English-language test? Or, is this
On 22 January 2013 17:41, Philippe Beaudette phili...@wikimedia.org wrote:
FYI, each and every edit on Commons has this text above the edit box:
...You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the
Creative Commons license.
Yeah, but Commons pulls in stuff from other
And I'm also unsure all the upload wizards have the same text?
2013/1/22 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com
On 22 January 2013 17:41, Philippe Beaudette phili...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
FYI, each and every edit on Commons has this text above the edit box:
...You agree that a hyperlink or URL is
I've always considered this poor policy on the part of Wikipedia; a sort of
intellectual grab that we do so well :(
I've uploaded images before by great photographers, after working to obtain
their permission, and make a point of crediting them when inserting the
image into the article - partly
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Richard Symonds
richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
All,
I have a question for you which I am sure you will enjoy discussing. It's
about licencing.
Wikimedia sites do not use a 'byline' on their images - for example,
On 22 January 2013 16:51, Richard Symonds
richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
It appears that opinion is divided on whether a hyperlink is acceptable as
attribution, therefore I'm asking the experts:
- Does anyone have any input on this?
- Has this discussion been had before, if so,
On 22/01/2013 18:28, Thomas Dalton wrote:
On 22 January 2013 16:51, Richard Symonds
richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
It appears that opinion is divided on whether a hyperlink is acceptable as
attribution, therefore I'm asking the experts:
- Does anyone have any input on this?
-
2013/1/22 ??? wiki-l...@phizz.demon.co.uk:
On 22/01/2013 18:28, Thomas Dalton wrote:
On 22 January 2013 16:51, Richard Symonds
richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
It appears that opinion is divided on whether a hyperlink is acceptable
as
attribution, therefore I'm asking the experts:
Hi,
great question, Richard! Seconding Matthew's comment on WMF blog policy: At
Wikimedia Deutschland we adopted the bottom notes for posts with multiple
images[1]. As a general rule, we include attribution in the bylines[2].
Adding yet another aspect to sufficient CC licensing, let's not forget
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 1:51 AM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Keegan Peterzell wrote:
1. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/OTRS/Reports/2012
2. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/OTRS
Nice. Thanks for putting this together. :-)
MZMcBride
+1, thanks, this is a great report! It's very cool
12 matches
Mail list logo
