I think there is an assumption that it is needed and indeed welcomed. From
my two experiences it has been very valuable and,I would argue, in an
organisation like ours essential for developing good working relationships
and practices.
On 20 September 2013 05:53, Balázs Viczián
News and notes: Third time's the charm: the FDC's newest round of funding
requests
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2013-09-18/News_and_notes
Traffic report: Twerking, tragedy and TV
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2013-09-18/Traffic_report
On 20/09/2013 05:53, Balázs Viczián wrote:
I think you miss my point: I see an event that is being pushed despite no
sufficient visible interest in it from those whom you are targeting with
it...
Sure you'll have more applications than vacant slots, it is pretty easy to
find people to travel
Hi,
A few people asked me with varying degrees of seriousness about this in
Hong Kong, so I'll just put this out there and say that Wikimedia Australia
will not be in a position to host this event in 2014.
Regards,
Craig Franklin
President - Wikimedia Australia
On 16 September 2013 22:11,
The name conference doesn't mean that it has to stick to the traditional
conference format.
Indeed, one of the suggested discussion topics (both in general, and for
the actual programme committee) is to consider different formats and
approaches (e.g. using the event for capacity building
[translation in Portuguese below]
Dear friends and colleagues,
tl;dr We are planning on partnering with the non-profit organization Ação
Educativa to carry out Wikimedia program work in Brazil, funded by a
partnership grant from the Wikimedia Foundation. This letter explains the
context for the
With (quick) apologies: the correct place to review the proposal is
here.[1] Reference 12 in the mail above is an earlier version. :-)
thanks,
Anasuya
[1]
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Programa_Catalisador_do_Brasil/Planejamento_2012-2013/Parcerias/A%C3%A7%C3%A3o_Educativa/Proposal
2013/9/20
