On 11/13/13 10:01 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
Hello all (cc Yana, Michelle, Geoff, legal, board).
In a formal poll[1] proposed by two admins, the it.wiki community has
decided the following:
«The Italian Wikipedia community considers that, among all the actions
in defense of its name (as in
H
Rupert,
The case you mention is unrelated to any copyright infringement (the
book is explicitely published under cc by sa. So there is no copyvio).
Its mention here is like hair falling in soup.
Now, I think there is a developing personal feud between you and
Iolenda. It sincerely
Salut florence, i obviously need to improve my English :) Marco suggested
human checking to avoid false positives and some annotation that it
happened. In my eyes the cited case is a verbatim copy of some compatible
license text which could be used as an example to demonstrate what he ment.
I did
tl;dr The FDC is meeting in San Francisco at the WMF office from November
17-21 for its deliberations on the current round of proposals. To ensure
that confidentiality is maintained throughout the process, I sent out a
letter to WMF staff with the ground rules established by the FDC.
--
Thanks Anasuya for this update and I wish the FDC and the FDC's staff good
luck in this demanding process.
Will Sue, Stephen, Frank and Asaf presentations will be shared with the
community also?
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 12:06 AM, Anasuya Sengupta
asengu...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
tl;dr The FDC is
Thanks, Itzik, for your wishes. Much appreciated!
About Sue, Stephen, Frank and Asaf's sessions, the staff assessments are
the only inputs to the FDC process that are designed to be public at this
time. And of course, the key output that is public is the FDC
recommendations text (to be published
Special report: FDC staff assessments raise the benchmarks for activities,
impact, planning, and governance
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2013-11-13/Special_report
News and notes: Trademark at issue again with the Italian Wikipedia and
wikipedia.it
