Bear in mind Pine that the RTBF request need not be from the subject of the
article (so BLP NPOV are less relevant), it could be someone mentioned
peripherally. The link suppression would also only relate to search terms about
/that/ person, rather than the main subject, just to muddy the
Thanks Simon.
Back to Trillium's point, I don't think we should vilify people solely for
making a removal request, but nor should we censor verifiable and notable
information that complies with our policies just because the subject
dislikes it, and we should be transparent about requests for
Meta comment: if our common goal is to increase collaboration, then we need
to excel ourselves in this collaboration precisely. If we minority of
tech-aware contributors are being confrontational between ourselves, then
we can only expect to nurture more confrontation than collaboration among
the
Quim, can you clarify your comments about the Technology Committee? The
committee is my proposal as a community member; it is not a top-down,
Board-created idea. Its membership is designed to be broadly representative
of the MediaWiki user community. The Board mandate is necessary to give
TechCom
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 3:33 AM, Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I think the core of the problem is how to increase the participation of
tech-curious contributors, and how to structure it in a way that informs,
influences, and actually joins the development process effectively.
How can we
About
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard#Suggestion_for_the_Board:_Technology_Committee
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Quim, can you clarify your comments about the Technology Committee? The
committee is my proposal as a
On 7 August 2014 00:56, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
I'll stand by what I said previously. The community liaisons (two Is) are
currently in the role of trying to sell the community on bad software.
Good software, surprisingly, doesn't need hired community liaisons to
roam around the
On 8 August 2014 01:29, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 August 2014 00:56, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
I'll stand by what I said previously. The community liaisons (two Is) are
currently in the role of trying to sell the community on bad software.
Good software, surprisingly,
David Gerard wrote:
Unfortunately - and we quite definitely saw this in the VE
introduction - it leaves a lot of them in the position of customer
service ablative firewall, the designated targets of people's
frustration.
Yep. At least one of the on-wiki comments by a liaison made me do a
Selfie of the Ape - The Copyright Wars - http://youtu.be/E8y1bhEj7j8
A Selfie Defines An Ape As It Defines A Human Being.
Just made a short Trailer. Have fun.
best regards
Jens
--
--
Jens Best
Präsidium
Wikimedia Deutschland e.V.
web: http://www.wikimedia.de
mail: jens.best
Este vídeo apresenta conteúdo de FOX, Budiey Dot Com Media e TV
Bandeirantes (Brazil). Um desses parceiros (ou mais) bloqueou o
conteúdo com base nos direitos autorais.
Which mean this movie cannot be watched in Brazil due to copyright reasons.
Funny enough I was going to send a message to
Yeah, just seen that youtube was quick on that one.
Here is the Dropbox-Link.
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/mifna71hgqi14mj/AAChbDTbcsu0t_esvxIMkMq0a?lst
Vimeo is coming up soon.
Jens
2014-08-08 4:33 GMT+02:00 Everton Zanella Alvarenga
everton.alvare...@okfn.org:
Este vídeo apresenta
And Vimeo-Link (let's see how long this lasts)
https://vimeo.com/102892584
have fun
Jens
2014-08-08 4:36 GMT+02:00 Jens Best jens.b...@wikimedia.de:
Yeah, just seen that youtube was quick on that one.
Here is the Dropbox-Link.
13 matches
Mail list logo
