Re: [Wikimedia-l] Quarterly reviews of high priority WMF initiatives

2015-01-23 Thread Guillaume Paumier
Hello again, Minutes and slides from the January 2015 quarterly review of the Foundation's Technical Operations team are now available at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WMF_Metrics_and_activities_meetings/Quarterly_reviews/Tech_Ops/January_2015 -- Guillaume Paumier

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Spam] Re: Become a Digital object identifier (DOI) registarnt

2015-01-23 Thread Andrew Gray
That said, there was an attempt in 2013 to provide Memento support, which would (partially) mitigate this problem by using appropriate templates: http://mementoweb.org/wikipedia/ Of course, this would still be vulnerable to deleted images etc. And we weren't even thinking about Wikidata

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Quarterly reviews of high priority WMF initiatives

2015-01-23 Thread Guillaume Paumier
Hello, Minutes and slides from the January 2015 quarterly review of the Foundation's Finance Administration team are now available at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WMF_Metrics_and_activities_meetings/Quarterly_reviews/Finance_%26_Administration/January_2015 -- Guillaume Paumier

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Is there some Wikimedia project to host contents based on original research? [Davenport]

2015-01-23 Thread Federico Leva (Nemo)
Erkan Yilmaz, 06/01/2015 19:02: Wikiversity allows original research: https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Original_research English Wikiversity, that is. (And French, perhaps others.) Italian Wikiversity does not.

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimedia Announcements] Winners Announced in World's Largest Photo Contest: Wiki Loves Monuments

2015-01-23 Thread Federico Leva (Nemo)
Vira Motorko, 24/12/2014 19:40: Is there a blog post onhttps://blog.wikimedia.org/ about this? Will it be? https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Blog#Drafting_a_post says to propose one yourself. For now I see

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Spam] Re: Become a Digital object identifier (DOI) registarnt

2015-01-23 Thread Petr Kadlec
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk wrote: The oldid. At the moment, I trust our long-term viability more than a 2014 web-archiving startup, even one with praiseworthy names attached ;-) Possibly an obvious remark: an oldid-based permalink gets you an old