I know David in real life so maybe I am not as objective as I could be but
I know how hard he works and how diligent he is about this admin work he
does. He is doing the devil's work in my opinion. I couldn't do what he
does so I'm thankful for his efforts. Thank you David.
When David has flagged
Hi!
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 4:01 PM, David Goodman wrote:
> I was the person who tagged the article we are discussing for deletion as
> no indication of importance.
Thank you for commenting here and for you work! I know it is a lot of
work and that errors are possible. This
I was the person who tagged the article we are discussing for deletion as
no indication of importance. I am quite aware I have a certain frequency of
error, probably about 2-5%, as does essentially everyone screening
articles. Therefore there is an firmly established practice , that no
Like you where told, Having an article not assert notably, and having an
article be non-notable are effectively the same thing for wikipedia.
You provided several examples specifically cities and plant/animal species,
both of those have inherent notability. However companies do not have such
a
Hi!
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 2:14 AM, Vi to wrote:
> My activity at en.wiki only deals with crosswiki abuse and lta
> "management". So don't be afraid of me but frainkly I don't find your
> startup incubator to be notable. In other words I don't find it to be
> something I
Okay, I did a pretty thorough scrub and reworking of the article. I added
the logo as well as moved it to the main space. As it stood the article
needed help but of course that's typical of new articles.
While the citations were okay I added more to them, and found a lot of
English articles as
On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 15:04:54 +0100
Lilburne wrote:
On 25/06/2016 06:49, Mitar wrote:
Hi!
I am an occasional editor of Wikipedia, I read it a lot, I edit
sometimes, and I am at all not familiar with bureaucracies and rules
Wikipedia community has developed
Thanks for the responses. I think the overarching thought I have is that
Wikipedia needs to learn as much from editors as editors need to learn from
Wikipedia. I'm glad other editors are responding and focusing on this.
I'm doing remote support of an editathon today so I will work on assisting
on
On 25/06/2016 06:49, Mitar wrote:
Hi!
I am an occasional editor of Wikipedia, I read it a lot, I edit
sometimes, and I am at all not familiar with bureaucracies and rules
Wikipedia community has developed through years (call me lazy, but
they simply always look too scary and too many for me to
Hi all,
As many of you have heard, Emily Temple-Wood (Keilana) and Rosie
Stephenson-Goodknight (Rosiestep) have been named as the co-Wikipedians of
the Year at Wikimania.
Congratulations to them both, along with the runner-ups Mardetanha and
Vassia Antanasova (Spiritia)!
You can read more about
My activity at en.wiki only deals with crosswiki abuse and lta
"management". So don't be afraid of me but frainkly I don't find your
startup incubator to be notable. In other words I don't find it to be
something I expect to find on an encyclopedia.
Vito
2016-06-26 9:57 GMT+02:00 Mitar
Hi!
This is restored version of the article with even more references (11)
than at the time of deletion (8):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mitar/Poligon
Mitar
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:47 PM, Pine W wrote:
> A number of us are currently discussing this situation on
A number of us are currently discussing this situation on IRC. (: I believe
that the immediate concern is being addressed, and we are also discussing
ways of improving the deletion process on ENWP.
Pine
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:21 PM, carl hansen
wrote:
> Mitar,
>
Mitar,
To get a deleted article back, ask an "Administrator" to move it to your
User_page draft
space so you can get your text/references . The text is still in the
system, just not accessible to public. There should be no
problem. You could even ask the Administrator who deleted it, via Talk page
14 matches
Mail list logo