On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 09:55, Jeff Hawke wrote:
> the WG then collate them and decide the final form of the
> recommendations, to be implemented by the WMF
This seems to be missing a rather crucial intermediate step; the one
where the recommendations are accepted, or not, by the wider Wikimedia
Many Wikimedians have left detailed and logical feedback on the Meta
talk pages, as per the request for feedback by Nicole Ebber.
No doubt there is no requirement to keep on making this same feedback
in other places, especially where not part of the planned feedback
process, or where the
Chris,
There is perhaps some confusion here. Most Wikipedians are accustomed to a
process of *discussion*, during which a consensus emerges and is accepted
by the community at large, and implemented by community prcesses. It has
perhaps not been made perfectly clear that this is a *feedback*
