Hi Patrick,
Thank you for your clarification. So if I understand correctly, there will
be no UCoC policy text review before sometime in 2023.
As this is quite a long time away, would it be possible to provide some
answers to the questions I asked earlier?
Hi Andreas,
The review of the policy text is planned one year after the close and the
ratification of the enforcement outlines, which are still being revised by
the Drafting Committee. Detailed information of the policy text review
will be communicated soon, as the revised guidelines are
Cue extended rant by somebody that the board, Foundation comms and/or legal
staff have no authority and/or are not competent to advise on this in 1, 2, 3
...
Cheers,
P
-Original Message-
From: Andy Mabbett [mailto:a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk]
Sent: 06 December 2021 15:35
To: Wikimedia
On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 13:34, Andy Mabbett wrote:
>
> Jimmy
As an aside, it would be good if Jimmy, or someone in contact with
Christie's on his behalf, could ask them to correctly attribute the
open-licensed images they've used.
"Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons" doesn't cut it.
Hi all,
As regards the use of the proceeds from this auction, Jimmy Wales posted
the following rather non-committal statement on his English Wikipedia talk
page:[1]
"I'm planning to donate a significant portion and use a significant portion
for wt.social. I haven't made any final decisions. I
On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 07:36, Peter Southwood
wrote:
>
> Damned if you do, damned if you don’t.
Quite. As Jimmy notes in the WP:AN discussion which has already been linked to:
I was instructed to inform the community by the Board of the WMF
and advised by
the Foundation comms and legal
I don't understand how a Wikimedia trustee using Wikimedia websites,
Wikimedia branding, and this Wikimedia supported email list to promote a
funding event for their own commercial project, i.e. "WT:Social", fits with
the bylaws which include:
"The property of this Foundation is irrevocably
