Good points, these. I hope someone will answer them.
Cheers,
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Inductiveload [mailto:inductivel...@gmail.com]
Sent: 26 January 2022 02:36
To: Wikimedia Mailing List
Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Re: Seeking community recommendations for Equity Fund
grantees
On 25
On 25 January 2022 17:11:59 GMT, Nadee Gunasena wrote:
> I've shared more
>information about how we'll be sharing the recommendations and making
>decisions about the grantees on Meta in response to your comment there:
>https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Knowledge_Equity_Fund#Concerns.
+1 — this is super cool! Congrats to all involved.
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 7:33 PM Samuel Klein wrote:
> This is the best. Thank you for persisting it making it not just useful
> but fantastic. :)
>
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 12:10 PM Sam Walton wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We've just published a
Mike, thank you for your reply and your questions. I've shared more
information about how we'll be sharing the recommendations and making
decisions about the grantees on Meta in response to your comment there:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Knowledge_Equity_Fund#Concerns.
Best,
Nadee
ᐧ
On
| From: Xeno (Jack) [mailto:xeno-...@wikimedia.org]
| Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 11:42 PM
/
| Hello everyone,
|
| The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees has provided an update
| on the ratification process for the updated Universal Code of Conduct
| (UCoC) Enforcement guidelines [1].
Kaya
As was said we should put forward wishes to the list even if they can't be
fulfilled by the team, by removing the issue from the wishlist you have
taken away the communities ability to express that they wish the issues to
be addressed.
Calling it out of scope and removing it is exactly what
So, let's face it... this is no a wishlist. This is a rigged process. Why
should we be using our time for something that won't be done?
From: Szymon Grabarczuk
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2022 8:11 AM
To: Wikimedia Mailing List
Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Re:
