Re: [Wikimedia-l] FDC staff proposal assessments for 2013-2014 Round 2 are posted

2014-05-10 Thread Erlend Bjørtvedt
Thanks for your answer dariusz! Still, I think there are still 3 critical issues: It requires that chapters are really able to express, in a foreign language, advanced phenomena and characteristics of their work. I have seen grant applications that prove the opposite, The only thing I Ask for,

Re: [Wikimedia-l] FDC staff proposal assessments for 2013-2014 Round 2 are posted

2014-05-10 Thread Balázs Viczián
You may also visit an overview of the financial information presented in these proposals, which includes information for all proposals in this round: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/FDC_portal/Proposals/2013-2014_round2/Financial_overview This page is empty. Vince

Re: [Wikimedia-l] FDC staff proposal assessments for 2013-2014 Round 2 are posted

2014-05-10 Thread Michael Peel
On 10 May 2014, at 19:43, Balázs Viczián balazs.vicz...@wikimedia.hu wrote: You may also visit an overview of the financial information presented in these proposals, which includes information for all proposals in this round:

Re: [Wikimedia-l] FDC staff proposal assessments for 2013-2014 Round 2 are posted

2014-05-09 Thread Kasia Odrozek
Hi Risker, It was indeed an unintentional mistake and thank you for pointing it out. I have corrected it in the assessment. Best, Kasia 2014-05-09 17:00 GMT+02:00 Risker risker...@gmail.com: Actually, Dariusz, if the FDC (which is not WMF/FDC staff) made the request, then the sentence is

[Wikimedia-l] FDC staff proposal assessments for 2013-2014 Round 2 are posted

2014-05-08 Thread FDC Support Team
Greetings, all: Staff proposal assessments have been posted on Meta for three proposals that were submitted in 2013-2014 Round 2. At the FDC's request, FDC staff have not published an assessment for the WMF proposal; however, an assessment of the WMF proposal has been published by WMDE. The