Dominic - A fair point; this shoudl be clarified explicitly in the
description of AffCom work. The discussion in DC will touch on both,
but is mostly about getting AffCom underway. SJ
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Dominic McDevitt-Parks
wrote:
> Thanks for that information. The resolution d
Thanks for that information. The resolution doesn't actually spell out that
AffCom is not working on the partnerships, except implicitly by failing to
mention movement partners along with the other three (which I hadn't even
realized on first reading). Will the movement roles discussion at the Boar
Hello Dominic,
A draft of the AffCom charter and plan have been shared with the
Board; I believe a final draft will be shared (and then published?)
within the week. It is on the agenda for the Board's July meeting.
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Board_meetings/July_11,_2012
AffCom is n
The Board's resolution for the new Affiliations Committee says that "The
proposed charter and plan should be submitted to the Board by 15 June, for
approval by its July 2012 meeting." Did that ever happen? I'm glad that
Wikimedia CAT has been able to start the thematic organization application,
and
Forwarding on behalf of Bence.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bence Damokos
Date: Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:41 PM
Subject: [Movementroles] Input on new models
Hi all,
Currently, the Chapters/Affiliations Committee is considering the
procedural elements needed for processing applicat
