The servers are still in the US, has anybody proposed a global effort? Will
Wikimedia move the servers to EU in case this is accepted?
On 28/02/2014, at 03:19, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
This is being done at least for EU, see consultation for which there is time
till
On 28 February 2014 06:41, Dennis Pierri dennis6...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be nice if all of the chapters send to their governments a
petition to allow a global standardized use of media just for wikimedia
projects, it is a big problem that every country has different laws on
copyright and
On 28 February 2014 21:49, Dennis Pierri dennis6...@gmail.com wrote:
The servers are still in the US, has anybody proposed a global effort?
Will Wikimedia move the servers to EU in case this is accepted?
No. There is quite a bit of stuff on Wikimedia severs that is in breach of
criminal law
Thanks for your reply :)
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 5:37 PM, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 February 2014 21:49, Dennis Pierri dennis6...@gmail.com wrote:
The servers are still in the US, has anybody proposed a global effort?
Will Wikimedia move the servers to EU in case this is
Wikimedia Argentina is formed by a group of volunteers from the Wikimedia
movement. That includes several long-time contributors to Commons that have
discussed with us in the past months the situation about URAA. This open
letter is not something written by a group of strangers or people that
It would be nice if all of the chapters send to their governments a petition to
allow a global standardized use of media just for wikimedia projects, it is a
big problem that every country has different laws on copyright and public
domain media, and that wikimedia has to comply with U.S law
I'm sorry but I find it pretty inappropriate that a chapter published such
strong words about volunteers of a Wikimedia Project *certain legal
fetishism whose reason gets lost in processes and misses the outcome.*
I'm speaking on my behalf, however as a former board member of a Wikimedia
Chapter
2014-02-26 13:26 GMT+01:00 Pierre-Selim pierre-se...@huard.info:
As a Wikimedia Commons volunteer I'm disappointed by the process followed
by some chapters, i.e. which have chosen to bypass the community and send a
letter directly to the board of trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation.
However,
Maybe it's a cultural issue, does e.g.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_letter have a geopolitically
limited point of view? Open letters are a common tool of *discussion*
with the public (= community in our case) in the corners of the world
that I know best.
Nemo
On 26 February 2014 13:51, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe it's a cultural issue, does e.g.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_letter have a geopolitically limited
point of view? Open letters are a common tool of *discussion* with the
public (= community in our case) in
)
To: Wikimedia Mailing List wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Open letter on open letters (Was: Open letter
from Wikimedia Argentina regarding URAA)
On 26 February 2014 13:51, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe it's a cultural issue, does e.g.
https
On 26 February 2014 16:46, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:
If anyone wants to create meaningful and lasting change to Commons,
then please create a Request for Comment on Commons[1] rather than
making a fuss and criticising Commons (volunteer) administrators in
non-Commons discussion channels,
On 26 February 2014 17:07, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 February 2014 16:46, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:
If anyone wants to create meaningful and lasting change to Commons,
then please create a Request for Comment on Commons[1] rather than
making a fuss and criticising Commons
Hi,
2014-02-26 22:56 GMT+05:30 Fæ fae...@gmail.com:
On 26 February 2014 17:07, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 February 2014 16:46, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:
If anyone wants to create meaningful and lasting change to Commons,
then please create a Request for Comment on
On 26 February 2014 17:55, Yann Forget yan...@gmail.com wrote:
...
On this, I agree (at least partially) with David. If only some Commons
admins were not pursuing a political campaign to delete URAA-affected files
under false pretences, everything would be much better.
If you have the evidence
Fæ, 26/02/2014 17:46:
For Chapters, I suggest you check who among your active volunteers are
most active on Commons[2] and ask them to help engage or create
discussion about policy and guideline changes. If you cannot find
anyone close to your chapter that is active and engaged on Commons,
2014-02-26 23:39 GMT+05:30 Fæ fae...@gmail.com:
On 26 February 2014 17:55, Yann Forget yan...@gmail.com wrote:
...
On this, I agree (at least partially) with David. If only some Commons
admins were not pursuing a political campaign to delete URAA-affected
files
under false pretences,
I really expect to not being, what in Brazil we call as jogar lenha na
fogueira (throw fuel on the fire in a literal translation) but...
The question here is something that the Board of Trustees known since 2007
[1], when it raised firstly by Wikisource volunteers: what to do with works
still
Look, I have no problem with the open letters from WM Venezuela, España or
Israel. I might not agree 100% with everything in them, but they are
generally on top of the issues, and they focus on the problems they law
poses for us and our need for better solutions - all worth bringing to a
wider
19 matches
Mail list logo
