On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 4:02 PM Philip Kopetzky
wrote:
> I would also find that helpful (if this isn't a policy that's been
completely rewritten). The legal text isn't especially easy to read and
understand either, so my only question would be if this new policy would
prevent past events that
Hi Amanda,
Thanks for this.
I've noted a suggestion on the talk page to state explicitly that the Board
should include reputational concerns (including the reaction of community
members and affiliates) when weighing up whether to approve a transaction
where there is a conflict. I feel this is
Hm, a lot of the text has been reworded and re-ordered, but without that
much difference in practical content. Complex enough that
automatically-generated diffs aren't much use, so I put together a (quite
messy) diff by hand:
I would also find that helpful (if this isn't a policy that's been
completely rewritten). The legal text isn't especially easy to read and
understand either, so my only question would be if this new policy would
prevent past events that happened because this kind of policy did not exist
back then.
Thank you for this, it will be useful for affiliates who are working on these
issues too.
Kind regards,
Nattes
Envoyé de mon iPhone
> Le 1 nov. 2021 à 14:02, Amanda Keton a écrit :
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> The Wikimedia Foundation legal team has posted a draft of an updated conflict
> of
On Mon, 1 Nov 2021 at 13:00, Amanda Keton wrote:
> The Wikimedia Foundation legal team has posted a draft of an updated conflict
> of interest policy on Meta-Wiki:
>
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Conflict_of_interest_policy/2021_updates
>
> We are collecting feedback on the policy for the
