Re: [Wikimedia-l] Siamese networks and image classification

Hi John, I think that these questions might be best asked on the AI mailing list, so I'm copying this thread to that list. I would suggest that further discussion should take place on the AI mailing list, because that's where the WMF experts on AI subjects are likely to participate. Thanks for

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Siamese networks and image classification

I had a plan to do a more thorough description on meta, but my plans are always to optimistic… ;) Question 1: I wonder if anyone has done any work on categorization of images on Commons by using neural nets. Question 2: I wonder if anyone has used Siamese networks to do more general

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Siamese networks and image classification

Hi John, I am having a little trouble with understanding your email from January 15th. Could you perhaps state your question or point in a different way? Pine On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Siamese networks and image classification

This is the same as the entry on the wishlist for 2016, but describes the actual method. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2016_Community_Wishlist_Survey/Categories/Commons#Use_computer_vision_to_propose_categories Both contrastive and triplet loss can be used while learning, but neither are

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Siamese networks and image classification

Hi John, I have not heard of an initiative to use Siamese neural networks for image classifications on on Commons. You might make a suggestion on the AI, Research, and/or Commons mailing lists regarding this idea. You might also make a suggestion in IdeaLab

[Wikimedia-l] Siamese networks and image classification

Has anyone tried to use a Siamese neural network for image classification at Commons? I don't know if it will be good enough to run in autonomous mode, but it will probably be a huge help for those that do manual classification. Imagine a network providing a list of possible categories, and the