This does not seem unreasonable.
Cheers,
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of
Pine W
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2018 4:47 AM
To: Wikimedia Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimedia Foundation Board Recruitment
I have a difference of perspective on this with Philippe and Seddon.
Records of personnel issues at many government agencies in the US are
public records, and many of those government agencies seem to do OK with
recruiting candidates. I have yet to hear any convincing reason why WMF
should be
James, are there any reasons that having a community-friendly opinion on
the subpoena, national security letter, political risks and related
overheads of using closed source hardware with backdoor coprocessors is an
inappropriate litmus test for the Technology Expert seat on the Board?
On Tue,
This mailing list thread is about the Wikimedia Foundation recruiting
members for its board and I would like to ask we stick to that, please.
James Hare
Associate Product Manager
Wikimedia Foundation
https://wikimediafoundation.org
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 11:22 AM, James Salsman
To follow up on this, Katherine, would you please state the relative risk
to politically controversial editors of using CPUs without backdoor
coprocessors to host Foundation projects?
Ref.:
https://chiefio.wordpress.com/2017/02/03/for-deep-security-use-arm-avoid-intel-amd-processors/
Are there a
On the original topic of technology advocacy representation on the Board,
an we please get someone from the open source hardware community and Legal
to tell us how much we could save in subpoena, hardware, and overhead costs
by avoiding backdoors? Has anyone on the Board ever championed open
"I am unaware of any laws which would prohibit WMF from publishing the
entirety of executives' compensation
details including their employment contracts, severance agreements,
and the circumstances
in which their departures happen."
Pine, I often appreciate your view and input on a range of
Hello Antanana,
Thank you for this information.
I would like to bring the topic of WMF's financial transparency into the
conversation about who should be selected for a WMF Board seat based on
their knowledge of finance. I am dissatisfied with WMF's financial
transparency on topics such as
Dear all,
As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees has two
appointed Board members whose terms will expire during Wikimania 2018 -
Kelly Battles and Alice Wiegand. We have been working to fill those seats
and our goal is for potential candidates to join us in Cape Town during
Thank you all for the thoughtful search & updates.
On Nov 29, 2017 7:14 PM, "Nataliia Tymkiv" wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> The Board Governance Committee (BGC) has been working on finalizing another
> potential candidate [1]. The results of the process were successful and the
>
Dear all,
The Board Governance Committee (BGC) has been working on finalizing another
potential candidate [1]. The results of the process were successful and the
Board has unanimously appointed the candidate the BGC has recommended. The
announcement is planned for December 1, 2017, so in two days
Thank you for this detailed update.
On Oct 5, 2017 5:24 PM, "Nataliia Tymkiv" wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Board recruiting has been demanding. We launched our first truly global
> search. It was far more work than we expected. But I am glad to say that we
> have significantly
Dear all,
Board recruiting has been demanding. We launched our first truly global
search. It was far more work than we expected. But I am glad to say that we
have significantly expanded our talent network and are engaged in
conversation with four, uniquely talented finalists.
We have missed some
13 matches
Mail list logo