Hi everybody,
today, board elections have begun. Please think twice on who you vote,
because past boards did not bring a lot of innovation (if any???) into
Wikimedia... and who else should bring innovation than the top governing
entity? Wikimedia suffers from declining editorship... on which the
Dear Milos,
No! But understand. Also now understand why you withdrew your Board
candidacy.
Thank you for writing so honestly. It touched a chord in me (having gone
through similar cycles in other worlds).
One of my earliest memories of the wikimedia movement is having a smoky
chat with you in
Am 07.06.2013 19:31, schrieb Milos Rancic:
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com wrote:
== Unfinished projects ==
Oh, and I knew that there were three unfinished projects, but I forgot
the last one.
Wikimedia movement isn't staying well with formal diplomacy. No
Hi Milos,
thank you is the least we can say at this point. We can be happy to be
such a big movement, with so many people like you who further our vision
and goals. Some fluctuation is natural and it is totally natural that
after serving some time in our community to move on to new and other
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com wrote:
I am leaving the movement. I thought to leave it quietly, with just a
bit more than a few words to stewards and Wikimedia Serbia, but after
the first question why I am leaving, I realized that I actually owe to
many of you
Thanks to all of you! It really matters to know that I will be welcome if I
back and it matters that people who matters to me think that I made an
impact to them and to the movement.
I was unprepared on Amir's mail and I reacted on it emotionally. After that
I realized which kind of emails I
This response seems to miss the fact that, in this particular case,
censorship is being accomplished through eavesdropping.
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Matthew Roth mr...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi all,
I wanted to share a clarifying email from Ryan Lane in WMF Ops. He's
working through the
What is this hard-enabled and soft-enabled? If the Chinese volunteer
editor community requests that HTTPS be soft-enabled for them, and you do
so, does that solve anything?
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Matthew Roth mr...@wikimedia.org wrote:
We've also hard-enabled HTTPS on all of our
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Matthew Roth mr...@wikimedia.org wrote:
We have had contact with the authors of the blog and they have said they
will publish our response to their article, though I'm not sure when or in
what format.
This is the content of our response:
The Wikimedia
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
What is this hard-enabled and soft-enabled?
I hope someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but...
I believe that soft-enabled means that https was set as the protocol
in the canonical URLs for uzwiki. So search engines should
Nathan wrote:
...
How would transcoding the stoplist stop censorship?
The paper Leslie linked to indicates that the Great Firewall operates
through automated packet inspection, but its stoplist is regularly exposed
in peer-to-peer applications such as TOM-Skype. We could replace its
stoplist
On 8 June 2013 23:16, James Salsman jsals...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Who approved the tighter restrictions on who can vote in Board elections
this year?
The requirements for voting are almost identical in 2013 compared to 2011.
For editor voters, WMF staff and contractors, and Board/advisory
Too bad mailing list posts don't count :-P My editing has been highly
sporadic, and for the first time in six years, apparently I don't
qualify to vote.
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 June 2013 23:16, James Salsman jsals...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Who
13 matches
Mail list logo
