Hi all,
When I'm not editing Wikimedia projects, I work for Mondelez
International, and our Social Media team has contacted me for advice
on responsible engagement with Wikipedia. I know that different
language projects have different rules on whether company
representatives should:
* Edit
In no-wp we have a policy that usernames shall be for individuals and thus
typical company usernames are blocked and asked to request change of names.
These users then have no restrictions on which pages to edit. As long as we
don't demand identification of users, restrictions on edits would IMO
Thanks for the quick reply, Hans! If our representatives would (for
example) translate an English company page into Norwegian, and then
explain the edits on the talk page, and identify their conflict of
interest on their user pages and also the article talk page, would you
expect that that would
The Wikimedia Nederland report for September is available:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_chapters/Reports/Wikimedia_Nederland/201309
It is also included as text in this message.
COMMUNITY: supporting and mobilising volunteers and editors
-
Our two-weekly Wiki-Saturdays
I'm not sure. Someone who posts deficient article that they obviously have
a special relationship to, where the language in addition is deficient, may
easily be meet by a deletion request. The difficulty with promoting a
company in Wikipedia is the promotion part, not the identity of the author.
HI Patricio: Thank you very much for sending along this updated list of
your new authorities. I have updated our internal list. Will you please
send along the email addresses for these new officers. You will remember
that this information is for internal use only.
Ivana Molena
Esteban Zarate
I'm not sure. Someone who posts deficient article that they obviously
have
a special relationship to, where the language in addition is deficient,
may
easily be meet by a deletion request. The difficulty with promoting a
company in Wikipedia is the promotion part, not the identity of the
Is skewing an article easier if you are good at it? Yes I think it is.
Hans
On 21 October 2013 21:13, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote:
I'm not sure. Someone who posts deficient article that they obviously
have
a special relationship to, where the language in addition is
2013/10/21 David Richfield davidrichfi...@gmail.com
Hi all,
For Swedish Wikipedia, as I understand our consensus and relevant texts
(WP:IK, WP:Användarkonto, WP:Att skriva om näringsliv, företag och
varumärken):
When I'm not editing Wikimedia projects, I work for Mondelez
International, and
This statement is also available online:
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Press_releases/Sue_Gardner_statement_paid_advocacy_editing
Statement from Sue Gardner, Executive Director of the Wikimedia Foundation,
in response to paid advocacy editing and sockpuppetry
Editors on the English
Tomasz W. Kozlowski wrote:
The discussion is taking place at
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Access_to_nonpublic_info_policy
and I invite every interested person (with a special invitation to
people holding advanced user rights on any Wikimedia wiki) to take an
active part in it.
This
Thanks all!
Surprising as it might seem for a company our size, we don't have any
consultants polishing our Wikipedia pages.
I'm not in communications at all: I'm in RD, but our Corporate
Communications team really does want to act in good faith, which is
why they started talking to me: they're
12 matches
Mail list logo