Re: [Wikimedia-l] National Museum of Korea releases images of artifacts and old books.
Thank you for your attention, Asaf. I am contacting them for better release but they seem very busy for the release. From the conversation with them, I think they need some help from some experts from GLAM-WIKI fellows of Wikimedia movement for continuing the opening and long term success. I found the release lacks some important meta data in my thought, for example the location of the heritage, and they do not understand Dublin Core and its extension for the museums. Korean Wikimedians will start to draft our opinion for better sharing. I hope we could borrow some wisdom who have the experience to lead a successful museum information releasing. Cheol 2013/12/17 Asaf Bartov abar...@wikimedia.org These are wonderful news, Cheol! Thanks for sharing them. Are you or any other Wikipedians in touch with them at all? If not, it might be a good time to get in touch, congratulate them on this decision, and describe the ways the Wikimedia community (not just in Korea!) can help get more exposure for Korean heritage and art via articles and translations, and also (perhaps) to contribute corrections to metadata, photo captions, etc. Cheers, Asaf On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 5:23 PM, RYU Cheol rch...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, folks. The National Museum of Korea announce high quality images of 7,300 artifacts would be released. And they will release the 100 thousands pages of old books. They said the material will be available for commercial uses. But the exact license term is not known. http://www.museum.go.kr/program/board/detail.jsp?menuID=001009001boardTypeID=32originalBoardTypeID=28boardID=19154 I hope I could find the images on Commons. Cheol ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe -- Asaf Bartov Wikimedia Foundation http://www.wikimediafoundation.org Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality! https://donate.wikimedia.org ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Cochrane Wikipedian In Residence
This is a truly awesome initiative, and many thanks to those involved in organising it! Chris On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Jake Orlowitz jorlow...@gmail.com wrote: Hey folks, Just a reminder that Cochrane is taking signups for a Wikipedian in Residence: Wikipedia:COCHRANE/WIR Cochrane is a fantastic organization which publishes systematic reviews about medical treatments and efficacy. Wiki Project Med Foundation is helping to coordinate the search for great candidates. The Wikipedian in Residence would ideally be: # An active Wikipedia editor, a Wikipedian in good standing, for at least 1 year and with 1,000 edits (more is preferable) # A science and/or healthcare enthusiast, preferably with a background as either a student or professional # An ambassador, capable of interacting between Wikipedia's community and Cochrane groups # A teacher, helping Cochrane contributors to properly and successfully navigate and use Wikipedia # A collaborator, comfortable working in and among a distributed network of professionals # A remote facilitator, adept with email, scheduling, online meetings, and conference calls # A passionate individual, both about Wikipedia’s mission and Cochrane's approach and goals The position is open to anyone who can meet these criteria but may be particularly suited to students or recent graduates looking to expand their skills and experience, or those who work part-time in another job. Candidates should have an excellent level of written and spoken English, although those that speak more than one language are particularly welcome to apply. ;Location Cochrane is structured as a network of groups located throughout the world to which people contribute in different ways, but primarily as authors of Cochrane Systematic Reviews. The WiR will work remotely from their chosen location and will interact with a number of groups and their contributors via email and online. Cochrane will provide a selection of online collaboration tools to facilitate communication. ;Reporting The WiR will report to, and be guided by, Cochrane’s Head of Communications External Affairs, and a Senior Editor of The Cochrane Library. They will also interact regularly with other members of Cochrane’s senior management team and representatives of its publishing partner for ''The Cochrane Library''. ;Working hours The WiR will be expected to work flexibly at different times of their day to suit their schedule and to help support Cochrane groups throughout the world (some work in the evenings is likely to be required). The exact number of hours per week will be agreed with the successful candidate, but is likely to be in the region of 7-12 hours per week. ;Remuneration The WiR will receive a stipend of up to $6,500 USD/£4,000 for the initial six month term, which will be paid in two instalments at the beginning and middle of the term. In addition, the WiR will be funded to attend and present a session at the 22nd Cochrane Colloquium in Hyderabad, India, 21st-25th September 2014. ;Applying to be WIR We want to learn more about you and see how we can best give you an opportunity to work with Cochrane. Signup! http://enwp.org/WP:Cochrane/WIR Cheers, Jake Orlowitz (Ocaasi) Wiki Project Med Foundation ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wikimedia-l] IEG 2013 Round 2 Grantees Announced
Today we’re announcing the second round of Individual Engagement Grantees. [1] These grants from the Wikimedia Foundation support individuals and small teams of Wikimedians to experiment with new ideas aimed at having online impact on Wikimedia projects. We’ve learned a lot from the first round of IEG grantees over the past 6 months, and look forward to seeing what this next group will accomplish.[2] Seven projects have been recommended by the *Individual Engagement Grants Committee*, a group of volunteers from across the Wikimedia movement who reviewed a set of more than twenty proposals, and approved by the Wikimedia Foundation for this round.[3][4] These selections represent a broad range of projects focusing on activities from outreach to tool-building and are all aimed at connecting and supporting our community. Grantees are trying out new ways of engaging with women and young Wikipedians, fostering participation in Africa, and supporting cartographers, researchers and developers to better engage with projects like Wikimedia Commons, Wikidata, and Wikipedia. The seven selected projects are: *Wikimaps Atlas* Led by Arun Ganesh and Hugo Lopez, funded at $12,500.[5] Hugo and Arun will be building a system to automate the creation of maps in standardized cartographic style using the latest open geographic data. With new workflows and scripts, they aim to make it easier for Wikimedia’s cartographers to generate and update maps for use in Commons, Wikipedia, and beyond. *Mbazzi Village writes Wikipedia* Led by Paul Kikuba with collaboration from Dan Frendin, funded at $2880.[6] This project is a collaboration between Mbazzi villagers, Wikimedia Sweden, and the Wikimedia Foundation to build a Wikipedia center in Uganda where volunteers can to contribute to Luganda Wikipedia, particularly focusing on articles related to sustainable development. *What is about - C'est quoi. A series of communication tools about Wikipedia in Cameroon* Led by Marilyn Douala Bell and Iolanda Pensa with collaboration from Michael Epacka, funded at €15,000.[7] The team in Douala, Cameroon will engage local artists to create comics, video, and other materials to raise awareness about Wikipedia and free knowledge. *Visual editor gadgets compatibility* Led by Eran Roz and Ravid Ziv, funded at $4500.[8] The team aims to map, organize, and surface lists of gadgets used in different language versions of Wikipedia to improve sharing of gadgets across language communities. They’ll also be piloting and documenting an approach for adapting the most-used gadgets for Visual Editor compatibility. *Wikidata Toolkit* Led by Markus Krötzsch with collaboration from students and researchers at Dresden University of Technology, funded at $30,000.[9] Markus’ team will develop a demonstrator toolkit for loading, querying, and analysing data from Wikidata. The project experiments with ways to give developers, researchers, and Wikimedians easier access to use Wikidata in applications, research, and other projects. *Women Scientists Workshop Development* Led by Emily Temple-Wood, funded at $9480.[10] Emily is piloting a model of regular, incentivized editing workshops aimed at college-aged women to encourage them to become regular contributors to Wikimedia projects and combat systemic bias with quality content. If the approach is successful, she’ll use lessons learned in order to develop a scalable kit for other groups to use. Finally, we’ve provisionally approved a seventh project: *Generation Wikipedia* Led by Emily Temple-Wood and Jake Orlowitz, funded at $20,000 - provided that legal dependencies can be satisfied.[11] This project would pilot a week-long summer conference for young Wikipedians and Wikimedians from around the globe to connect, share skills and build leadership and community capacity among our newest generation of editors. The ten grantees from Cameroon, Uganda, India, Israel, France, Italy, Germany and the United States will begin their projects in the new year; most will run from January through June 2014. They’ll be regularly sharing their progress, experience and lessons learned from their experiments throughout this period, so please feel free to visit their respective pages on Meta for project information and updates in the coming months.[4] Thanks to everyone who boldly created a project idea or shared feedback and suggestions in this round! The next round of IEG proposals opens on 1 March 2014. We look forward to seeing more of your ideas and engagement in 2014.[12][13] Sincerely, Harold A. Hidalgo On behalf of the *Individual Engagement Grants Committee*. --- 1. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG 2. http://blog.wikimedia.org/2013/08/01/ieg-learnings-call-new-proposals/ 3. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG/Committee 4. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG#ieg-engaging 5. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG/Wikimaps_Atlas 6.
Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Commons-l] The British Library releases 1 million images
On 12/16/2013 03:36 AM, Andrew Gray wrote: Remember that while US caselaw is clear on this point, it is less clear-cut elsewhere. We at WM tend to take a clear line that 2D reproductions are ineligible, but it's not a guaranteed absolute truth, particularly in the UK! We can predict how a court might rule... but they haven't yet, and claiming copyright is a legally defensible position in many cases. (Legally defensible is not always correct, of course...) As a result, an explicit declaration is a positive thing and definitely should not be discouraged. I would actually prefer it be more explicit. The EXIF data says public domain, but Flickr says No known copyright restrictions (why not public domain or CC0?). However, we can do our own standard PD-Art analysis to confirm this. Matt Flaschen ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] The British Library releases 1 million images
On 12/15/2013 12:48 PM, Juergen Fenn wrote: 2013/12/15 Katie Chan k...@ktchan.info: We plan to launch a crowdsourcing application at the beginning of next year, to help describe what the images portray. The images release contained no image-level metadata == One million uncategorised images == Commons community raise up in arms It does not really make a difference whether you release a million images without metadata to Flickr, or to Commons. It comes without any metadata, so it cannot be searched (and images cannot be found) in either case. :( As Andrew said, the interesting question is whether the Commons community can effectively help curate/add metadata for this unidentified content. I agree with Andy (see http://www.generalist.org.uk/blog/2013/mechanical-curator-on-commons/#comment-209343) that tools for easier curation will be quite helpful. Matt Flaschen ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wikimedia-l] [Wikimedia Announcements] IEG 2013 Round 2 Grantees Announced
Today we’re announcing the second round of Individual Engagement Grantees. [1] These grants from the Wikimedia Foundation support individuals and small teams of Wikimedians to experiment with new ideas aimed at having online impact on Wikimedia projects. We’ve learned a lot from the first round of IEG grantees over the past 6 months, and look forward to seeing what this next group will accomplish.[2] Seven projects have been recommended by the *Individual Engagement Grants Committee*, a group of volunteers from across the Wikimedia movement who reviewed a set of more than twenty proposals, and approved by the Wikimedia Foundation for this round.[3][4] These selections represent a broad range of projects focusing on activities from outreach to tool-building and are all aimed at connecting and supporting our community. Grantees are trying out new ways of engaging with women and young Wikipedians, fostering participation in Africa, and supporting cartographers, researchers and developers to better engage with projects like Wikimedia Commons, Wikidata, and Wikipedia. The seven selected projects are: *Wikimaps Atlas* Led by Arun Ganesh and Hugo Lopez, funded at $12,500.[5] Hugo and Arun will be building a system to automate the creation of maps in standardized cartographic style using the latest open geographic data. With new workflows and scripts, they aim to make it easier for Wikimedia’s cartographers to generate and update maps for use in Commons, Wikipedia, and beyond. *Mbazzi Village writes Wikipedia* Led by Paul Kikuba with collaboration from Dan Frendin, funded at $2880.[6] This project is a collaboration between Mbazzi villagers, Wikimedia Sweden, and the Wikimedia Foundation to build a Wikipedia center in Uganda where volunteers can to contribute to Luganda Wikipedia, particularly focusing on articles related to sustainable development. *What is about - C'est quoi. A series of communication tools about Wikipedia in Cameroon* Led by Marilyn Douala Bell and Iolanda Pensa with collaboration from Michael Epacka, funded at €15,000.[7] The team in Douala, Cameroon will engage local artists to create comics, video, and other materials to raise awareness about Wikipedia and free knowledge. *Visual editor gadgets compatibility* Led by Eran Roz and Ravid Ziv, funded at $4500.[8] The team aims to map, organize, and surface lists of gadgets used in different language versions of Wikipedia to improve sharing of gadgets across language communities. They’ll also be piloting and documenting an approach for adapting the most-used gadgets for Visual Editor compatibility. *Wikidata Toolkit* Led by Markus Krötzsch with collaboration from students and researchers at Dresden University of Technology, funded at $30,000.[9] Markus’ team will develop a demonstrator toolkit for loading, querying, and analysing data from Wikidata. The project experiments with ways to give developers, researchers, and Wikimedians easier access to use Wikidata in applications, research, and other projects. *Women Scientists Workshop Development* Led by Emily Temple-Wood, funded at $9480.[10] Emily is piloting a model of regular, incentivized editing workshops aimed at college-aged women to encourage them to become regular contributors to Wikimedia projects and combat systemic bias with quality content. If the approach is successful, she’ll use lessons learned in order to develop a scalable kit for other groups to use. Finally, we’ve provisionally approved a seventh project: *Generation Wikipedia* Led by Emily Temple-Wood and Jake Orlowitz, funded at $20,000 - provided that legal dependencies can be satisfied.[11] This project would pilot a week-long summer conference for young Wikipedians and Wikimedians from around the globe to connect, share skills and build leadership and community capacity among our newest generation of editors. The ten grantees from Cameroon, Uganda, India, Israel, France, Italy, Germany and the United States will begin their projects in the new year; most will run from January through June 2014. They’ll be regularly sharing their progress, experience and lessons learned from their experiments throughout this period, so please feel free to visit their respective pages on Meta for project information and updates in the coming months.[4] Thanks to everyone who boldly created a project idea or shared feedback and suggestions in this round! The next round of IEG proposals opens on 1 March 2014. We look forward to seeing more of your ideas and engagement in 2014.[12][13] Sincerely, Harold A. Hidalgo On behalf of the *Individual Engagement Grants Committee*. --- 1. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG 2. http://blog.wikimedia.org/2013/08/01/ieg-learnings-call-new-proposals/ 3. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG/Committee 4. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG#ieg-engaging 5. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG/Wikimaps_Atlas 6.
[Wikimedia-l] Fundraiser Update
Hi everyone, I've just posted a new update on meta. Please take a look and leave any questions or comments on the talk page: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fundraising_2013 On Monday, we started limiting the number of banners we are displaying to readers. If you continue to see banners more than just one more time (on the same device), please let us know.https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Fundraising_2013 Donations are still coming in and settling in our accounts, so donation totals are preliminary and will be adjusting in the next few weeks. So far this fiscal year, we've raised (very roughly) $27 million from nearly 2 million small dollar donors. We will raise the remaining $13 million now through the end of the fiscal year in June 2014. The team is planning to put English banners up again at a higher level around December 31 for a final year-end push. All of the multilingual campaigns will run in 2014. We will post a full report of the fundraiser along with test reports from hundreds of A/B banner tests in 2014 once we get through reconciliation and analysis. Thank you very much to everyone involved in the fundraiser this year. It's still not over quite yet, but we've had a very successful and exciting couple of weeks. Megan -- Megan Hernandez Director of Online Fundraising Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wikimedia-l] Readers still love you
More love from our readers for you. Enjoy! i feel like i have a new brain bolted on. that's the internet in general, but a few of the gears in there are labeled 'wikipedia' It beautiful how you can get authentic information on almost everything in one place.. you guyz are doing a great job I read a lot of scifi when I was a kid and always dreamed of something like Wikipedia. Of course, I thought a computer would cover the whole wall so maybe the dream wasn't exactly prescient. In a world where 99% of people waste their life on Facebook its great to have a destination where you can go and learn something. I also get a great kick out of seeing some hamster-brained celebrity crow about how inaccurate Wikipedia is because she hasn't bothered to learn how to use it. If you don't know how to drive stick shift, don't complain about the poor machine design. As with all tireless volunteers, all ya'll inspire me and make me want to contribute more to my community (read: my city, my state, my country, my world) Years ago, I would have to listen to my husband and sister-in-law argue about who was right ALL THE TIME. Now, they just pull out their phones, and Wikipedia has all the answers. The bickering has come to an end. Halleluiah! I cannot remember a day in the last 5 years when I haven't opened a Wikipedia page at least once. Thank you! I'm a med student and use your site daily. There is simply NO REASON to be ignorant about ANYTHING. I've always felt that, but Wikipedia has made it nearly criminally lazy to be so. Game changer. No other way to say it. There was a life before Wikipedia, but it was not nearly as enlightened!!! I think it is one of mankind's greatest achievements. No joke. I am old enough to remember encyclopedias. This is lots better. I use wikipedia every day. I now use it with Siri. I would like it permanently wired into my brain. I was a professional technical/scientific translator (German, French, Spanish to English) and constantly needed information on all sorts of things in different language. You can pick up a lot by comparing the German and English articles. makes my 8 yr old daughter smarter, enriches her, makes her more curious, more empowered, more relevant to the community, and helps shape her relationship to technology, seek truth, and develop a deeper understanding of the world and her day to day life. 3 Elegant searches for truth nourishes the soul. We tour cross country and our iPhones read us the Wiki entries on the histories, demographics and economies of the cities we visit! It's like an endless podcast of fascination and learning! I've always found Wikipedia useful but now, sort of out-of-the blue, I'm helping raise a 14 year old. Do you have any idea how many questions daily whether homework-related or life-related that adds up to? No, neither do I, but it's a lot and it's great to be able to have a knowledge resource against which I can grade my own answers! Brilliant quick reference source to back up ludicrous arguments! don't need a brain anymore, I got Wikipedia. As a father of two school age children, I do not always have the answers to help them with their homework.but Wikipedia usually does !! Your editors are supremely good. Your online concept has rendered the venerable encyclopedia extinct. You guys are doing a great job - for humanity. I'm jealous . Thanks to Wikipedia, I'm a master of all subjects as long as I have an active internet connection. Best thing that ever happened to me since the internet -- Megan Hernandez Director of Online Fundraising Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraiser Update
thanks for the update Megan and congrats on getting this far On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Megan Hernandez mhernan...@wikimedia.org wrote: Hi everyone, I've just posted a new update on meta. Please take a look and leave any questions or comments on the talk page: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fundraising_2013 On Monday, we started limiting the number of banners we are displaying to readers. If you continue to see banners more than just one more time (on the same device), please let us know.https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Fundraising_2013 Donations are still coming in and settling in our accounts, so donation totals are preliminary and will be adjusting in the next few weeks. So far this fiscal year, we've raised (very roughly) $27 million from nearly 2 million small dollar donors. We will raise the remaining $13 million now through the end of the fiscal year in June 2014. The team is planning to put English banners up again at a higher level around December 31 for a final year-end push. All of the multilingual campaigns will run in 2014. We will post a full report of the fundraiser along with test reports from hundreds of A/B banner tests in 2014 once we get through reconciliation and analysis. Thank you very much to everyone involved in the fundraiser this year. It's still not over quite yet, but we've had a very successful and exciting couple of weeks. Megan -- Megan Hernandez Director of Online Fundraising Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wikimedia-l] [Wikimedia Announcements] 2013-14 Round 2 FDC/annual plan grants timeline moved out by a month: proposals due April 1, 2014
Dear friends and colleagues, The 2013-2014 Round 2 FDC timeline and all associated dates are being pushed back by one month. Here are the key date changes: * Deadline for entities to meet eligibility requirements: 15 March 2014 * Proposal submission deadline: 1 April 2014 * Community review period: 1 April 2014 - 30 April 2014 * Staff assessment deadline: 8 May 2014 * FDC recommendations due: 1 June 2014 * Board decision due: 1 July 2014 This change in dates has been made for a few reasons. First, it allows for the FDC and community to review the annual plan and budget of the WMF. As you know, WMF participated in the first year of the FDC process in Round 1 (October 2012). While this was important, the process ended up being complicated for both the FDC and WMF. WMF used a (no longer in use) distinction of ‘core’ and ‘non-core’ activities, and shared only the ‘non-core’ portion of its plan in the FDC proposal, rather than its entire annual plan (as did all other entities). The timing of the WMF proposal was also difficult; the allocation was made retroactively at a time when the annual plan was already six months into implementation. While the FDC and WMF agree that WMF should continue to participate in the process, they also agree that participation in Round 1 is not a viable solution. The FDC and WMF have been discussing how the WMF can be part of the FDC process in a way that is meaningful and allows for a robust community review. While the exact details are still to be confirmed, both agree that the best way forward is for the WMF to participate in Round 2 of the FDC process. This approach also allows for community review of the WMF plan through the FDC process, before the FDC recommendations and Board approval of the WMF annual plan. However, given WMF’s size, the first version of the WMF plan and budget is only ready by April (the planning process begins after a six month retrospective is analysed by the WMF Board in January/February, and strategies for the next year are approved). Therefore, pushing back the FDC timeline by one month would allow for version 1 of the WMF annual budget and plan to be submitted for FDC and community review. In addition, we consulted with entities that were likely to apply in Round 2, in order to check their preference: they informed us that pushing the dates back by one month was, in fact, more convenient to them as well. Overall, this timing will create an equal 6 month spacing between the two annual plan/FDC cycles as opposed to the current 7 month / 5 month timeframe. We will be updating all the FDC documentation with these new dates,[1] but this is a heads up particularly for those intending to apply for Round 2. Do let us know if you have any questions or concerns about this shift in dates. Best wishes and warm holiday greetings to all of you. Here’s to a fulfilling 2014 for the entire movement! Anasuya and the FDC staff [1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/FDC_portal -- *Anasuya SenguptaSenior Director of GrantmakingWikimedia Foundation* Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality! Support Wikimedia https://donate.wikimedia.org/ ___ Please note: all replies sent to this mailing list will be immediately directed to Wikimedia-l, the public mailing list of the Wikimedia community. For more information about Wikimedia-l: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l ___ WikimediaAnnounce-l mailing list wikimediaannounc...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaannounce-l ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
