Awful, awful news. My condolences to his family, friends, and the WMUA
community =(.
On 24 February 2014 09:01, Maryana Pinchuk wrote:
> For those of you who don't read Ukrainian, a quick ad-hoc translation of
> the blog post. So sorry for the loss of a fellow Ukrainian and such a
> bright y
May he rest in peace
Sent from my iPhone
On 24/02/2014, at 06:56, Craig Franklin wrote:
> Awful, awful news. My condolences to his family, friends, and the WMUA
> community =(.
>
>
>
>
> On 24 February 2014 09:01, Maryana Pinchuk wrote:
>
>> For those of you who don't read Ukrainian, a q
Dear All,
I just want to bring this post to the attention of the list, advertised
today.
https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/Technical_Programme_Manager
The deadline for applications is Friday 7th March at 17:00. You can get in
touch for a chat about the post if you have questions. Please do forward
t
Dear movement fellows,
Wikimedia Argentina would like to express its support for the letter by
Wikimedia Israel regarding URAA-motivated massive content deletions in
Wikimedia Commons. Yet, we would like to express our view not only to the
Foundation BoT but also to all Wikimedia editors, and espe
Hi,
I can't access the supposed-to-be-public archive of wikimedia-l anymore (
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/).
What happened? Or I am doing anything wrong?
Best
Cornelius
Cornelius Kibelka
Twitter: @jaancornelius
Mobile:+351-91-9860232 (Vodafone PT)
German number curren
Hi Cornelius,
There is a bug about this at the moment, we're not completely sure what it
is yet because the settings on the interface side appear correct. You can
still see the archives at
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.org.wikimedia.foundation however for now.
James
Bug: https://bugzilla.wikimedia
Ah, thanks, James.
Best
Cornelius
Cornelius Kibelka
Twitter: @jaancornelius
Mobile:+351-91-9860232 (Vodafone PT)
German number currently offline
On 24 February 2014 21:36, James Alexander wrote:
> Hi Cornelius,
>
> There is a bug about this at the moment, we're not completely sure wha
The archives were rebuilt (and then restored up to January) under
request of a user who shared private information in February. Old links
are not broken and you can normally access the specific "volumes":
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2014-February/thread.html
Nemo
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
> The archives were rebuilt (and then restored up to January) under request
> of a user who shared private information in February. Old links are not
> broken and you can normally access the specific "volumes":
> http://lists.wikimedia.o
Hear that sound?
That's the sound of a million data miners working to figure out what juicy
bit of info has been redacted.
Cheers,
Craig
On 25 February 2014 09:48, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
> The archives were rebuilt (and then restored up to January) under request
> of a user who shared pri
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Craig Franklin
wrote:
> Hear that sound?
>
> That's the sound of a million data miners working to figure out what juicy
> bit of info has been redacted.
>
> Cheers,
> Craig
>
>
Found it: http://bit.ly/1fsZjVI
___
Wikimed
Did that reflect on gmane?
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014, at 10:48, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
> The archives were rebuilt (and then restored up to January) under
> request of a user who shared private information in February. Old links
> are not broken and you can normally access the specific "volumes":
Nathan, 25/02/2014 01:57:
Was that done so that anyone who wanted to know precisely which post
contained sensitive info would simply need to compare lists of posts
between the "official" archive and the various services that publicly
archive the list?
No, it was done so that people know what li
13 matches
Mail list logo
