>
> Superprotect is now over five years old. Superprotect's removal is now over
> four years old. It was a mistake, and it was explicitly acknowledged as
> such: the then-ED of the WMF said it had "set up a precedent of
> mistrust". Almost all of the people involved in it are no longer affiliated
Hi Dan,
I think that there are a couple of lines of thought here. I think that
we should make a distinction between individuals and the institution
of WMF.
For the former, I think that you make a good point. Along the same
lines, there were probably people who worked at WMF at the time and
had
On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 at 23:49, Pine W wrote:
> Here are a couple of arguments from WMF in favor of SuperProtect, which was
> implemented to prevent local users from removing MediaViewer.
Superprotect is now over five years old. Superprotect's removal is now over
four years old. It was a
On Sun, 26 Jan 2020 at 00:49, Pine W wrote:
> Here are a couple of arguments from WMF in favor of SuperProtect, which was
> implemented to prevent local users from removing MediaViewer.
>
It's interesting that this topic came up, as there was a bug in MediaViewer
that disturbed me so much I've
