I have a background in a telecom supplier, and we were proud to talk of
us "connecting people" and with 5G (where things also gets connected)
"interconenctivity" would be a great brand concept for that company.
But for Wikimedia I have never felt this as a relevant brandconcept. To
"share and
I agree. It did not seem to say anything much.
Cheers,
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of
Fæ
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2020 3:06 PM
To: Wikimedia Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Summary of the Brand Project
¡Hola a todos!
I'm inviting everyone who wishes to participate in World Tapir Day on April 27.
In the past few years the organization https://www.tapirday.org has carried out
various live activities. But due to the current situation, they didn't this
year. I wrote to them and they were happy
Hi,
Interconnection is a six piece word for link. In the wiki world a wiki is
both a page and a link.
I sincerely doubt you are going to propose to use Interconnectionpedia as
the single brand.
Greetings,
Ad
Op vr 17 apr. 2020 10:57 schreef Samir Elsharbaty :
> Hi everyone,
>
>
> Yesterday,
Have now watched "interconnection". It did not seem to say anything
tangible apart from stuff like you find 'interconnection in nature' in
the 2 minutes. It was produced to a good standard.
Sorry, it was not encouraging. The question remains of how much this
is costing the movement in WMF funding
