There's another option: the 2020 pandemic lockdowns made a huge peak on views, so year on year, 2021 has worse results.2022(e)ko urt. 7(a) 18:41 erabiltzaileak hau idatzi du (Anders Wennersten ):When I look at statistics for mature wikipedias: en, de pl, nl they all
show a decrease of views of
When I look at statistics for mature wikipedias: en, de pl, nl they all
show a decrease of views of 13-15% in last 12 months from a year ago,
and number of active editors down 10- 20 % (with exception of en).
Has this been analysed somewhere, are we losing our readers and
contributors or is
We have seen several search results where Wikipedia search rank have gone
down. It is not only me but several other Wikmedians have found the same,
so it may not be a user preference/behaviour issue. It is also not only for
specific search such as "vaccine", where Google would show WHO.
শুক্র, 7
Additionally, pandemic 2020 with a lot of lockdowns makes many
people commit to different activities, among them starting editing on
Wikipedia or reading more. Basically, in my opinion it is better to compare
with 2019 numbers. Also, it will be useful to have some kind of survey
about this which
Nathan,
All,
I wonder if Google maintains provenance for their “snippets” and whether
developers and platform teams would be interested in requesting an API which
includes features such as subscribing to pings (daily, weekly, or monthly)
reporting usage data pertaining to derived data. The
I think a lot has been said on this list over the last few years about a
couple of major factors that probably still play a role:
* Shift to mobile device usage and how that affects Wikipedia usage and
pageview stats
* Availability of more and more "snippets" in search engine results, which
often
Hi/Bona nit
Specifically regarding the last emails about videos and new formats in
university students and their use of Wikipedia. A truth is that we already had
the chance to integrate better multimedia contents and formats via some
channels that he already had: our sister projects.
Well the story around Osmosis has further details... They released their
first 300 or so vidoes under an open license and they were within Wikipedia
articles for a while. You can still see them on Commons here:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Videos_from_Osmosis
A number of folks
[Apologies for cross-posting.]
Hi all,
We invite you to nominate one or more scholarly research publications
to be considered for the Wikimedia Foundation Research Award of the
Year. Learn more below.
=Purpose of the award=
Recognize recent research on or about the Wikimedia projects or recent
Have been tracking medical pageviews for EN WP for more than 10 years. It
appears our readership peaked around 2014, there was a bump during the
pandemic, and now the fall in pageviews is continuing again... This despite
much of our pageviews for medicine continuing to be related to the pandemic.
"Is the traffic measured where content is read" would be a better way of
putting it.
--
Gohary (ircpresident)
On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 12:52 AM Juergen Fenn wrote:
> Anders raised the question how this relates to "smarter" machine-created
> traffic. Do we know more about this?
>
> Best Regards,
Anders raised the question how this relates to "smarter" machine-created
traffic. Do we know more about this?
Best Regards,
Jürgen.
Am 07.01.22 um 21:45 Uhr schrieb James Heilman:
> Have been tracking medical pageviews for EN WP for more than 10 years.
> It appears our readership peaked around
With respect to some anecdotal evidence, I have for many years asked the
medical students who work with me on their clinical rotations how they
study. I get a few passes through my department a month.
Most reported using Wikipedia 5 to 10 years back. Now sources like
Osmosis, which are basically
Thanks, James. I think this is an important point. So we could say we
have lost a part of acedemia.
More to the point, we seem to have failed to integrate course materials
and multimedia formats into Wikipedia articles.
Could we try and create some of these and integrate them into articles
14 matches
Mail list logo
