On 28 June 2012 01:37, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
Jay, what did Jimmy expect the press to report? None of you have been doing
this since yesterday. Jimmy's very petition is signed Jimmy Wales,
Wikipedia founder.
Recently, the Wikimedia Foundation was approached by the founders of an
organization called the Internet Defense League, which is soon to be
launched. The founders would like the Foundation to join the League.
However, the online community as a whole is the heart of this proposed
grassroots
well i decided to delete them, and other articles dealing with peoples
personal lives.
I dont want to deal with stuff like that,
mike
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Mike Dupont
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
Well you think i should delete them from the speedydeletion wikia?
@Tobias O.:
You are wrong, the day before yesterday
RalfR. wrote,
that only the winners will write history
(Aber es stimmt schon,
der Sieger schreibt die Geschichte, so
falsch das auch sein mag
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Internet_Defense_League I wonder why
it was not deleted yet. considering that established artists and
doctors are speedily deleted, why not them?
mike
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Philippe Beaudette
phili...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Internet Defense League
--
Uhm, {{sofixit}}?
___
Philippe Beaudette
Director, Community Advocacy
Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
415-839-6885, x 6643
phili...@wikimedia.org
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Mike Dupont jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Well I am not a deletionist, I am just pointing out that there is a
very strange criteria for deletion on the wikipedia, that is why i
started the speedydeletion.wikia.com
mike
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Philippe Beaudette
phili...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Uhm, {{sofixit}}?
On 28 June 2012 22:59, Mike Dupont jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
Well I am not a deletionist, I am just pointing out that there is a
very strange criteria for deletion on the wikipedia, that is why i
started the speedydeletion.wikia.com
The article has several references to
Could we keep this thread on topic please ?
Alex
2012/6/28 Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com
On 28 June 2012 22:59, Mike Dupont jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Well I am not a deletionist, I am just pointing out that there is a
very strange criteria for deletion on the
On 28 June 2012 23:10, J Alexandr Ledbury-Romanov
alexandrdmitriroma...@gmail.com wrote:
Could we keep this thread on topic please ?
The thread has no topic. It was just an announcement pointing to the
RFC, all the discussion is taking place there. There's no harm in
re-purposing this thread to
Thomas Dalton, 29/06/2012 00:32:
On 28 June 2012 23:26, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
I think we should debate what is and isn't thread hijacking, and when it
may or may not be appropriate.
The weather today in London was wonderful.
Also, this thread is a valuable example of what the
11 matches
Mail list logo
