Google accidentally blocks Bisexual from Instant Search and Autocomplete.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfbO4iFaJOw
As you say, we're strong LGBT supporters. Sometimes perfectly good search
terms can trip up our algorithms that decide whether to show instant
results. This can happen
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:48:29AM +0100, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Katie Chan k...@ktchan.info wrote:
On 19/08/2012 11:04, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
I currently see 370 submissions pending. Does this mean that someone has
processed 700 articles since the
charles andrès, 08/20/2012 12:27 PM:
WTF? What the link between WMF finances and the topic? And by the way are you
talking about the movement finances or the foundation finances, because it's
not the same thing.
Besides, we're supposed to have higher privacy standards than, say,
Google and
A question about copyright, who owns the copyright on Xrays and are they
even copyrightable? I have uploaded a few of them and no one seems to know
the answer. I guess the options would be:
1) They are in the public domain
https://open.umich.edu/wiki/Casebook#Radiograph_.28X-Ray.29 and
Well, it's good to see that France is safe from genocidal maniacs who
can't speak a language other than French, then.
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been told (and have verified) that the French Wikipedia indeed does
without categories to mark
2) The X ray tech who took the image
3) The person / institution who paid to have the image taken
a) The HMO or patient if in the USA
b) The government if in many parts of the world
4) The doctor who ordered the image
5) The doctor who read the image
6) The hospital / shareholders of
On 20 August 2012 12:08, James Heilman jmh...@gmail.com wrote:
A question about copyright, who owns the copyright on Xrays and are they
even copyrightable? I have uploaded a few of them and no one seems to know
the answer. I guess the options would be:
Why is it any different to any other work
I'm sure that collectively we can bloviate with the best of 'em on the
topic - but do we have any case law whatsoever anywhere on the topic
that might give real-world pointers?
- d.
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:47 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sure that collectively we can bloviate with the best of 'em on the
topic - but do we have any case law whatsoever anywhere on the topic
that might give real-world pointers?
It's a question of fact, not a question of
On 20 August 2012 12:50, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:47 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sure that collectively we can bloviate with the best of 'em on the
topic - but do we have any case law whatsoever anywhere on the topic
that might give
2012/8/20 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
On 20 August 2012 12:50, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:47 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sure that collectively we can bloviate with the best of 'em on the
topic - but do we have any case law whatsoever
@ Tomasz: Per a) if the picture is taken automatically by machine in
routine way (in case of X-ray, NMR and some other techinques this is
usually atomatic
and routine) - they are not copyrightable, as this is not any creative
work. This is my understanding. X rays are taken in the exact same
way
2012/8/20 Anthony wikim...@inbox.org:
Under US law (I know very little about the law of other countries):
Unless the patient somehow contributed creatively to the image (broke
his bones in a certain creative pattern), it's certainly not the HMO
or patient. If the X-ray tech is an employee,
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:03 AM, James Heilman jmh...@gmail.com wrote:
@ Tomasz: Per a) if the picture is taken automatically by machine in
routine way (in case of X-ray, NMR and some other techinques this is
usually atomatic
and routine) - they are not copyrightable, as this is not any
In the US, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
(HIPAA) governs release of medical information, which includes any medium,
including spoken, written, or electronically stored. This includes videos,
photographs, and x-rays. The only person legally entitled to release this
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Cynthia Ashley-Nelson
cindam...@gmail.comwrote:
In the US, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
(HIPAA) governs release of medical information, which includes any medium,
including spoken, written, or electronically stored. This
On 20 August 2012 18:27, Cynthia Ashley-Nelson cindam...@gmail.com wrote:
In the US, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
(HIPAA) governs release of medical information, which includes any medium,
including spoken, written, or electronically stored. This includes
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:17 PM, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 August 2012 12:52, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 August 2012 12:50, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:47 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sure that collectively we can
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Sage Ross ragesoss+wikipe...@gmail.comwrote:
I'd say, whatever the copyright status, she'd risk her job by
distributing something like X-rays without going through the IRB
system. And if she got IRB permission, asserting PD status or copyleft
status or
My opinion on X-rays. If done in private property, it is subject to
personality rights, and if in a public area, then it can be copyrighted by
the the person who took the X-ray. Ebe123
On 2012-08-20 5:17 PM, Sage Ross ragesoss+wikipe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:04 PM,
The WMF legal team has said they would provide an opinion on this
question some time next week. The law is ambiguous and I guess the
real question is how much is the foundation willing to put their neck
out.
--
James Heilman
MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine
On 08/20/12 12:17 PM, geni wrote:
On 20 August 2012 12:52, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 August 2012 12:50, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:47 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sure that collectively we can bloviate with the best of 'em
Was this long thread launched by an actual on-wiki (or off-wiki)
Wikipedia or other WMF project issue with medical imaging images?
...
Pardon if it would be obvious should I actually check AN or some such,
but I've been busy all weekend and today.
-george
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Ray
Hi, all.
I believe Mike was commenting on the fact that his message was bounced back
(because of an email funky) and not the topic itself. In fact, I've been
caught by that exact same filter myself.
Sorry if I've read your message wrong.
Matthew Bowker
User:Matthewrbowker
On Aug 20, 2012,
24 matches
Mail list logo
