their website offers:
"PAGE CREATION
Creation of fully formatted wiki entry.
Includes writing fee (US writers).
Sourcing of reliable references.
Backlink to your website.
Guaranteed SERP boost.
Traffic from wikipedia.
90 days moneyback guarantee!"
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:55 PM, charles andrès
Like so? http://xkcd.com/810/
judging from their website, I don't think it will be very long before
they get their IP(s) blocked, but if they do generate high quality
content, even commercially, I don't see the problem.
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> They're going to he
I may have misunderstood, but I think it's nothing else that what we already
explain to companies arguing that informations in their article are inaccurate
i.e. answering "improve your website with more useful information and
wikipedians will use it in the article"
charles
They're going to help their clients by writing useful, policy compliant
articles? Damn them!
In all seriousness, apart from the suggestion of meatpuppetry, it sounds
like it might actually be a good service. The internet is on the way to
becoming a much better place now search engine algorithms ar
My work just got this contact submission today. I am kind of annoyed that they
offer this service. Has anyone else encountered it?
Most aggravating line:
" Wikipedia editors are notorious for their strict policy in allowing links or
company entries. We have realized, over the years- that the b
>From the editor: ''Signpost'' adapts as news consumption changes
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2012-09-10/From_the_editor
Special report: Two Wikipedians set to face jury trial
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2012-09-10/Special_report
Op-ed:
On 11 September 2012 12:16, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> On 11 September 2012 09:41, Thomas Morton
> wrote:
> > Reading through it now I have had time, and with my legal cap on..
> >
> > IB probably have a strong enough case to win some of their claims (which
> is
> > how civil suits often work).
> >
On 11 September 2012 09:41, Thomas Morton wrote:
> Reading through it now I have had time, and with my legal cap on..
>
> IB probably have a strong enough case to win some of their claims (which is
> how civil suits often work).
>
> The behaviour they describe,* if true*, is disappointing (on a pe
Reading through it now I have had time, and with my legal cap on..
IB probably have a strong enough case to win some of their claims (which is
how civil suits often work).
The behaviour they describe,* if true*, is disappointing (on a personal
note) to see. I don't want to see our guys sued over
