hi erik,
there is a lot of good reasoning in your mail. you talk of "engineering
functions" and "product functions" already existing. which ones are these,
what is their responsibility, and how many people work in these functions
currently?
rupert
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Erik Moeller wr
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Marcin Cieslak wrote:
> > To avoid fear and anxiety, and to make sure the plan makes sense, I
> > want to start an open conversation now. If you think any of the below
> > is a terrible idea, or have suggestions on how to improve the plan,
> > I’d love to hear from
> To avoid fear and anxiety, and to make sure the plan makes sense, I
> want to start an open conversation now. If you think any of the below
> is a terrible idea, or have suggestions on how to improve the plan,
> I’d love to hear from you. I’ll make myself personally available to
> anyone who want
Op-ed: 2012 WikiCup comes to an end
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2012-11-05/Op-ed
News and notes: Wikimedian photographic talent on display in national
submissions to Wiki Loves Monuments
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2012-11-05/News_and_no
Briefly:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Lodewijk wrote:
> Hi SJ,
>
> to boldly push my question again: do I understand from this correctly there
> was at this instance (in your opinion) no urgency
There is always some urgency to fix problems once a fix is identified - for
instance, it was good
(Double Post, Since this was crossposted in the first place, and to
make sure I hit both lists, Sorry Wikitech)
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Erik Moeller wrote:
> The way we’d get there:
>
> I’m prepared to resign from my engineering management responsibilities
> and to focus solely on my rema
FYI: We have office hours today at 17:30 UTC with Denny, Lydia (and me)
from the Wikidata team.
Office hours will be in the #wikimedia-office IRC channel. You can join
via webchat: http://webchat.freenode.net/ or another IRC client.
Cheers,
Katie
-- Forwarded message --
From: L
Hi SJ,
to boldly push my question again: do I understand from this correctly there
was at this instance (in your opinion) no urgency that would validate the
chosen procedure? I know you seem to be in favor of this change as much as
I am, but I'm simply trying to understand if there are situations
Risker, 06/11/2012 09:40:
On 6 November 2012 03:07, Florence Devouard wrote:
Errr. No. At least historically, this is incorrect.
Michael Davis was the first treasurer of the board (appointed by Jimbo at
the beginning of the WMF). After some time, Michael announced his desire to
quit the board
Risker, 06/11/2012 03:26:
On 5 November 2012 20:01, John Vandenberg wrote:
Bylaw changes are never housekeeping.
[snp]
Somewhere in 500,000 bytes, do you
really think there was any likelihood that there would have been anything
posted that would have improved this housekeeping chang
On 6 November 2012 03:07, Florence Devouard wrote:
> On 11/6/12 3:26 AM, Risker wrote:
>
>> On 5 November 2012 20:01, John Vandenberg wrote:
>>
>> Bylaw changes are never housekeeping.
>>>
>>> This resolution does change the composition of the board.
>>>
>>> Two seats had a defined role, with c
On 11/6/12 3:26 AM, Risker wrote:
On 5 November 2012 20:01, John Vandenberg wrote:
Bylaw changes are never housekeeping.
This resolution does change the composition of the board.
Two seats had a defined role, with clear responsibilities. Now they dont.
Of course there is always shared respon
Risker is right. This mainly reflects long-standing reality in a more
transparent way, and is an exercise in more effective delegation. A few
years back the staff liaison to the Board (James) took many of the notes at
meetings, which was helpful; since then the Secretary has done much of that
dir
13 matches
Mail list logo
