Peter, we stand up to big bullies. As big as they get. But in this case, I
cannot see the WTO bullying us. Their terms are very reasonable in my
opinion, and I am grateful to the legal team for handling this situation
this well.
But in this case, we are talking about either changing a
Peter Southwood, 02/06/2013 07:43:
So we stand up to small bullies, by not to big ones.
Nice to know where the line is drawn when it comes to principles.
Why would you want to share visual identity with a bully?
Nemo
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
MZM,
This time misses the point of risk management - it's all probabilistic
rather than deterministic. It is totally reasonable for WMF to have judged
that the differences between the two logos are large enough that a
trademark claim is sufficiently *unlikely* to happen. But outliers do occur
and
Very eloquently put Denny.
I think your point is very well made that independently of what we as
individuals think about the legal Trademark merits of this particular case,
or the community processes of choosing a logo, the point remains that our
fighting this would not help to serve the mission
Originally published at
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/The_Wikinewsie_Group/Newsletter/1
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/The_Wikinewsie_Group/Newsletter/1#mw-navigationhttp://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/The_Wikinewsie_Group/Newsletter/1#p-search
The Wikinewsie Group Newsletter
Sharing news about
On 2 June 2013 06:43, Peter Southwood peter.southw...@telkomsa.net wrote:
So we stand up to small bullies, by not to big ones.
Nice to know where the line is drawn when it comes to principles.
The principle being applied here is, I think, do the right thing.
The WTO is going out of their way
Perhaps I missed something, because to me their logo does not look much like
the WV logo. I would think that to anyone familiar with either of the logos,
the other would be immediately recognised as different. Anyone who has the
pattern recognition abilities to read should see that they differ
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.comwrote:
Peter Southwood, 02/06/2013 07:43:
So we stand up to small bullies, by not to big ones.
Nice to know where the line is drawn when it comes to principles.
Why would you want to share visual identity with a
Deryck Chan wrote:
This time misses the point of risk management - it's all probabilistic
rather than deterministic. It is totally reasonable for WMF to have judged
that the differences between the two logos are large enough that a
trademark claim is sufficiently *unlikely* to happen. But outliers
Adam Baso, 31/05/2013 20:39:
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2013/05/getting-started-with-structured-data.html
I've tried the helper but I didn't find many tags of use (they already
know that stuff about Wikipedia). However, some of those schema.org tags
(like Article) could be
Thanks to all for your kindly comments.
Daniel: The broadcast production considers songs and sounds with copyright,
but I think we can upload a CC version without restrictive sounds to
Wikimedia Commons. This is our first big project with the GLAM partnering
and sounds fine the collaboration in
11 matches
Mail list logo
