Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Internal-l] 2013-2014 Round 1 FDC eligibility status IRC office hours

2013-07-19 Thread Nicole Ebber
Hi Anasuya,

thank you for your quick response!

Best,
Nicole

On 19 July 2013 01:45, Anasuya Sengupta asengu...@wikimedia.org wrote:
 Hi Nicole,

 Happy to help! No, the $6M _doesn't_ include any potential FDC allocation
 for WMF in Round 2.

 Warmly,
 Anasuya


 On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Nicole Ebber 
 nicole.eb...@wikimedia.dewrote:

 Hi Anasuya and Garfield,

 please allow me a quick question:

 * In 2012-13, the FDC grants (round 1 and 2) were $4.7 M plus the WMF
 FDC grant of $4.5 M = a total of $9.2 M.
 * In 2013-14, the FDC grants are budgeted with a total of $6 M.

 What is unclear to me is if this $6 M are including the FDC grant the
 WMF might apply for in round 2 or not. Can you clarify this for me?

 Thanks a lot and best regards,
 Nicole

 On 18 July 2013 10:34, Lodewijk lodew...@effeietsanders.org wrote:
  Thanks Sam for the clarification. I'm sorry to hear this was not
 discussed
  in the board apparently. I hope you will be able to share the outcome of
  that discussion to remove any uncertainty that may have remained.
 
  I do agree that there was no major change in how the annual plan was
  handled this year - but I tried to put things in a perspective. The WMF
 did
  not try to 'compensate' the lack of FDC process this year by for example
  publishing the draft annual plan or financial plan earlier in the process
  for community review. I remain of the opinion (also towards chapters)
 that
  sharing early drafts to what they consider their memberships is often a
  good thing.
 
  While the FDC decision on the WMF request may not have been unanimous,
  since the fiscal year was fully started, people had been hired and even
  paid for, I don't think it would have been possible for them to make
  serious cuts. By the suboptimal process that was followed, it was
  definitely afterwards, and as the input for the process had already been
  board approved and also the output decision was a board decision, besides
  the fact that there is a whole discussion possible over core/non-core, I
  would have been very very surprised if anything else than 100% approval
  would have been the result. This is of course also why this process is
  changed. My point here was primarily that with all its flaws, not even
 this
  process was followed this year. Because imho it *was* indeed an
 improvement
  over the years before.
 
  Anasuya: My apologies for being confusing. I was of course referring to
 the
  approval of the WMF 2013/2014 non-core activities, not so much to the
  2013/2014 FDC process. I understand from your email that you're
 confirming
  the clear explanation by Anders Wennersten. Thank you for that.
 
  Kind regards,
  Lodewijk
 
 
  2013/7/18 Anasuya Sengupta asengu...@wikimedia.org
 
  Hi Lodewijk,
 
  Since you asked specifically about WMF not sending in a Letter of Intent
  (LoI) to the FDC process, WMF - like any other entity interested in
  applying for Round 2 - doesn't need to have sent it in by June 8th as
 did
  those interested in applying for Round 1. Essentially, entities that are
  interested in applying for Round 2 of any year have the option of either
  publishing an LoI by June 8th, clarifying they intend to apply for
 Round 2,
  or publishing it by November 8th in order to be eligible for Round 2. As
  Anders mentioned, the FDC and WMF are in a conversation to confirm the
  details, but WMF intends to apply for Round 2 of the 2013-14 FDC
 process.
 
  thanks,
  Anasuya
 
  
   2013/7/16 Lodewijk lodew...@effeietsanders.org
  
Maybe this has been asked elsewhere already, apologies in that case,
  but
could someone clarify why the Wikimedia Foundation is not eligible
 any
   more
(and did not seem to send a letter of intent) for the FDC process?
 Does
this mean WMF will only do core programs and shut down all other?
 Or is
there another explanation I did not think of yet (this is of course,
assuming the WMF is still intending to eat it's own dog food)?
   
Best,
   
Lodewijk
   
   
2013/7/16 Garfield Byrd gb...@wikimedia.org
   
Dear members of the Wikimedia community:
   
Today, July 15, the Wikimedia Foundation published a list of Funds
Dissemination Committee (FDC) eligible entities [1] based the
   eligibility
criteria [2] established in the FDC framework.  Entities that
  submitted
Letters of Intent [3] are categorized in 'Yes', 'Yes, If',  and
 'No'
categories based the eligibility criteria.  Please let us know if
 you
believe there are any corrections to be made to this list.
   
A more detailed eligibility checklist document has also been
 created.
   
[4]
   
This document outlines eligibility gaps that need to be closed by
   September
15, 2013. Any entity in the Yes, If category must post all
 missing
documents on Meta by September 15 to be eligible for FDC funding.
Entities in the “No” column who are currently ineligible for FDC
   funding or
those who decide not 

[Wikimedia-l] The most controversial topics in Wikipedia: A multilingual and geographical analysis

2013-07-19 Thread Anders Wennersten
A most interesting study looking at findings from 10 different language 
versions.


Jesus and Middle east are the most controversial articles seen over the 
world, but George Bush on en:wp and Chile on es:wp


http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1305/1305.5566.pdf

Anders

___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] The most controversial topics in Wikipedia: A multilingual and geographical analysis

2013-07-19 Thread Sophie Osterberg
Thanks for sharing! This is a very interesting read.

/ sophie


2013/7/19 Anders Wennersten m...@anderswennersten.se

 A most interesting study looking at findings from 10 different language
 versions.

 Jesus and Middle east are the most controversial articles seen over the
 world, but George Bush on en:wp and Chile on es:wp

 http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/**papers/1305/1305.5566.pdfhttp://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1305/1305.5566.pdf

 Anders

 __**_
 Wikimedia-l mailing list
 Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.**org Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: 
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-lhttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
 mailto:wikimedia-l-request@**lists.wikimedia.orgwikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org
 ?subject=**unsubscribe




-- 
*Be Bold!
Sophie Österberg
sosterb...@wikimedia.org*


*Every single contribution to Wikipedia is a
gift of free knowledge to humanity. *
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] About the wiki-adoption process

2013-07-19 Thread David Cuenca
Yaroslav,

If the SPCom is not yet a WMF committee, what is the status? Who is
expected to take action?

Micru

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Yaroslav M. Blanter pute...@mccme.ruwrote:

 On 17.07.2013 07:03, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:

 David Cuenca, 17/07/2013 00:36:

 Thanks for pointing that out, I have seen that there is a proposed
 process
 https://meta.wikimedia.org/**wiki/New_project_process#**
 Adopting_an_existing_project_**into_Wikimediahttps://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/New_project_process#Adopting_an_existing_project_into_Wikimedia

 However it is not that clear what is the status of the SPCom... is it
 meant to become a user group?


 Not sure what you mean by user group, it's meant to be a WMF committee.


 Just to make it clear, for the time being it is not a WMF committee and
 has no official status. It may become some day.

 Cheers
 Yaroslav

 __**_
 Wikimedia-l mailing list
 Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.**org Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: 
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-lhttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
 mailto:wikimedia-l-request@**lists.wikimedia.orgwikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org
 ?subject=**unsubscribe




-- 
Etiamsi omnes, ego non
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Staff Images

2013-07-19 Thread Matthew Roth
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:33 PM, L. Tuxwell Anonanon t...@linuxlover.orgwrote:


 Roary, please know that I was not distressed by any of the earlier
 comments in this thread.  I see a vanguard of my relatives already
 quietly oversee the Wikimedia offices.  We are a sociable clan,[1]
 and accept your proffered paw of peace.  We find felines make fine
 company, with your flexible nature, thick skin and tendency toward
 deep furry naps.  You seem to be quite warm; I hope to get to know
 you more closely.[2]

   We are working on ways at managing consistency in house at the
  moment and appreciate your feedback and patience.
  More photos coming soon enough.
  Meal


 All this talk of feed consistency makes me hungry too.  I find the
 best-tasting feedback involves collaboration over a squid.[3]

 Love and Wikiwiki,
 Tux

 [1] http://bit.ly/12EeYcR
 [2] http://bit.ly/15HZHgi


tut tut, Tux. Bitly shortener?
http://ur1.ca/

:)




 [3]
 http://commons.wikimedia.org/**wiki/File:Gentoo_Penguin_**
 feeding_its_chick_(6063656750)**.jpghttp://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gentoo_Penguin_feeding_its_chick_(6063656750).jpg



 __**_
 Wikimedia-l mailing list
 Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.**org Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: 
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-lhttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
 mailto:wikimedia-l-request@**lists.wikimedia.orgwikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org
 ?subject=**unsubscribe




-- 

Matthew Roth
Global Communications Manager
Wikimedia Foundation
+1.415.839.6885 ext 6635
www.wikimediafoundation.org
*http://blog.wikimedia.org/*
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] The GAC wants you!

2013-07-19 Thread Alex Peek
I am interested to sign up and learn more about the process


On 19 July 2013 09:57, Asaf Bartov abar...@wikimedia.org wrote:

 *bump*

 (thank you for the folks who have stepped up so far!)

A.


 On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Asaf Bartov abar...@wikimedia.org
 wrote:

  Hello, everyone.
 
  We could use some fresh b--- er, volunteers! -- in the Grant Advisory
  Committee (GAC).  As you may know, the GAC are community volunteers who
 are
  explicitly invited[1] to review and evaluate grant proposals made in the
  Wikimedia Foundation Grants Program[2], and offer advice to both grant
  applicants and the Foundation.
 
  Read all about it on the Candidates page[3].  New members will be
 inducted
  Aug 20th 2013, so be sure to step forward before then! :)
 
  Please help this message reach as many people as possible, by relaying it
  to appropriate lists and village pumps.
 
  Cheers,
 
 Asaf
 
  [1] _everyone_ is implicitly invited!
  [2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Index
  [3] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grant_Advisory_Committee/Candidates
  --
  Asaf Bartov
  Wikimedia Foundation http://www.wikimediafoundation.org
 
  Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the
  sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality!
  https://donate.wikimedia.org
 



 --
 Asaf Bartov
 Wikimedia Foundation http://www.wikimediafoundation.org

 Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the
 sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality!
 https://donate.wikimedia.org
 ___
 Wikimedia-l mailing list
 Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
 mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] The GAC wants you!

2013-07-19 Thread Asaf Bartov
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Alex Peek alexpe...@gmail.com wrote:

 I am interested to sign up and learn more about the process


Ok, go ahead, then. :)

   A.
-- 
Asaf Bartov
Wikimedia Foundation http://www.wikimediafoundation.org

Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the
sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality!
https://donate.wikimedia.org
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] The GAC wants you!

2013-07-19 Thread Asaf Bartov
*bump*

(thank you for the folks who have stepped up so far!)

   A.


On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Asaf Bartov abar...@wikimedia.org wrote:

 Hello, everyone.

 We could use some fresh b--- er, volunteers! -- in the Grant Advisory
 Committee (GAC).  As you may know, the GAC are community volunteers who are
 explicitly invited[1] to review and evaluate grant proposals made in the
 Wikimedia Foundation Grants Program[2], and offer advice to both grant
 applicants and the Foundation.

 Read all about it on the Candidates page[3].  New members will be inducted
 Aug 20th 2013, so be sure to step forward before then! :)

 Please help this message reach as many people as possible, by relaying it
 to appropriate lists and village pumps.

 Cheers,

Asaf

 [1] _everyone_ is implicitly invited!
 [2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Index
 [3] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grant_Advisory_Committee/Candidates
 --
 Asaf Bartov
 Wikimedia Foundation http://www.wikimediafoundation.org

 Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the
 sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality!
 https://donate.wikimedia.org




-- 
Asaf Bartov
Wikimedia Foundation http://www.wikimediafoundation.org

Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the
sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality!
https://donate.wikimedia.org
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Internal-l] 2013-2014 Round 1 FDC eligibility status IRC office hours

2013-07-19 Thread Garfield Byrd
Itzik:

There are no new requirements in this process, the reports requested
reflect the reports needed by the chapter agreement and the FDC process.
 As for format of the 2012 activity report, I suggest you look at chapter
reports http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Reports to see what presentation
and format may work best for your chapter.  As for the financial report,
you always have the option of using the short form financial
reporthttp://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2012_ShortFinancialReport.pdffor
the FDC process as WM France did, to reduce the impact of translating
a
larger document.

Regards,

Garfield


On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:12 AM, Itzik Edri it...@infra.co.il wrote:

 Hi Garfield,

 I must say I'm surprised from the new requirements. Eligible entities of
 last year now need to send by 15 September documents about 2012 - a year
 that is totally unrelated to the FDC process that started only this year?
 Why it been decided only now?
  We are not hiding a thing, but not only by 30th July we need to send FDC
 Q2 report, by 1st October annual plan budget for 2014, and by 31 October
 FDC Q3 report.. Hey, not everyone are big chapters, and we are really need
 time also to *work* and execute the program we asked the money for...

 So financial report can be translated from the financial report we sent to
 the Israeli authority (again, more money spends on translation as probably
 our employees don't have time for that and have other paper work, and this
 is also going to work if there is no special format and different numbers
 and metrics requsted by the FDC and not different from what we already have
 on the report we made..). But about the 2012 activity report? What format?
 what information need to be there? this is totally something we need to
 collect from start and mean more administrative work.


 Itzik


 On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 3:06 AM, Garfield Byrd gb...@wikimedia.org
 wrote:

  Dear members of the Wikimedia community:
 
  Today, July 15, the Wikimedia Foundation published a list of Funds
  Dissemination Committee (FDC) eligible entities [1] based the eligibility
  criteria [2] established in the FDC framework.  Entities that submitted
  Letters of Intent [3] are categorized in 'Yes', 'Yes, If',  and 'No'
  categories based the eligibility criteria.  Please let us know if you
  believe there are any corrections to be made to this list.
 
  A more detailed eligibility checklist document has also been created.
 
  [4]
 
  This document outlines eligibility gaps that need to be closed by
 September
  15, 2013. Any entity in the Yes, If category must post all missing
  documents on Meta by September 15 to be eligible for FDC funding.
  Entities in the “No” column who are currently ineligible for FDC funding
 or
  those who decide not to proceed with an FDC application are welcome to
  consider applying to the WMF Grants program. [5]
 
  On September 15, WMF will post the final list of the entities eligible to
  apply for FDC funding if they are eligible. Please note that entities
 will
  need to remain in compliance with all Chapter Agreements and Grant
  Agreements until funds are sent in order to receive a grant through the
 FDC
  process, even if eligibility is confirmed as Yes on 15 September.
 
  The detailed eligibility checklist has improved since the last round.
  You’ll now note that the final column now outlines upcoming requirements
  (e.g. per chapter or grant agreements or current grant requirements) to
  maintain FDC eligibility status. These are noted as “potential gaps,” and
  as those deadlines come up, entities will need to fill those gaps (for
  example, by posting their documents and linking to them from the Reports
  page on Meta) in order to maintain their eligibility status with the
 FDC. We
  hope this change allows entities, the FDC, and the FDC staff to track
  eligibility better and ensure that everyone is informed of potential as
  well as current issues that may affect eligibility.
 
  All entities that apply for FDC funding will be required to maintain
  eligibility throughout the duration of the proposal review process until
  funds are sent (or until the decision on whether to send funds is made).
 We
  encourage you to get in touch with us if you have any questions about
 your
  entity's gaps or potential gaps.
  http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Index
 
  http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Index
 
  As a reminder, all applications for FDC funding from eligible entities
  must be submitted by October 1, 2013 via the FDC portal. [6] The FDC
  proposal form will be posted by August 15, 2013 on the FDC portal. Please
  contact us if you have any questions about submitting your proposal.
 
  WMF staff will reach out to all the of the entities that submitted
 Letters
  of Intent individually to discuss their eligibility.
 
  In addition, the FDC support staff has scheduled two IRC office hours to
  provide more explanation about the eligibility status. [7] We