[Wikimedia-l] Fw: MetaWeb updated and refined mission statement and link

2013-09-14 Thread Joseph Chirum



Hello

Thank you for your feedback... I did not know Wikidata existed.  This project 
looks like pretty much what i was trying to do through MetaWorld's Data.

You were right about the branding problem... I was using Metawiki , 
MetaWeb, and Meta World's Data interchangeably.  I was doing this 
intentionally however, because i was trying to avoid a branding problem.  I did 
not want the community to preference one name over the others, since they are 
all accurate.  I guess the thing to do now, is merge with Wikidata.

Is anybody on this list working on wikidata, and have any advice for where to 
begin on a project like this.  I am happy to see that the project has already 
been begun... of course i am not the first person to think of an idea like this 
one.

I would like to see more discussion of A.I. metadata bots if anybody out there 
is working on this stuff.

Thank you

Art




 From: MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com
To: Joseph Chirum sundog...@yahoo.com; Wikimedia Mailing List 
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org 
Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] MetaWeb updated and refined mission statement and 
link
 

Joseph Chirum wrote:
Hello everybody

Hi.

I havent seen any
 feedback directly associated with the Meta World's
Data, project proposal ... Please get involved ... we are us.

Yes, I think we can all agree that we are us.

You seem to have a branding problem currently. You're somewhat rambling
about... I'm not really sure what. You seem to use the terms MetaWeb,
Meta World's Data, and apparently MetaWiki interchangeably. This
naming inconsistency makes it difficult to sell your idea(s) to others.

Wikimedia has a general history of bad naming (Wikipedia, Wikimedia,
MediaWiki, etc.). You've created a page at Meta-Wiki called MetaWiki.
You're, err, not helping matters. :-)

Most of what you're talking about (I think) sounds very similar to
Wikidata. Have you looked at https://www.wikidata.org and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata?

Hope that helps.

MZMcBride
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fw: MetaWeb updated and refined mission statement and link

2013-09-14 Thread Neil Harris

On 14/09/13 21:32, Joseph Chirum wrote:



Hello

Thank you for your feedback... I did not know Wikidata existed.  This project looks like 
pretty much what i was trying to do through MetaWorld's Data.

You were right about the branding problem... I was using Metawiki , MetaWeb, and 
Meta World's Data interchangeably.  I was doing this intentionally however, because i was trying 
to avoid a branding problem.  I did not want the community to preference one name over the others, since they 
are all accurate.  I guess the thing to do now, is merge with Wikidata.

Is anybody on this list working on wikidata, and have any advice for where to 
begin on a project like this.  I am happy to see that the project has already 
been begun... of course i am not the first person to think of an idea like this 
one.

I would like to see more discussion of A.I. metadata bots if anybody out there 
is working on this stuff.

Thank you

Art


You might want to join the Wikidata-L mailing list, which exists to 
discuss Wikidata: see


https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l

for how to subscribe.

-- Neil



___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe