However we have seen a 20-30% drop in pageviews coming out of this tool
http://toolserver.org/~alexz/pop/view.php
Mr.Z-man has looked into it here
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mr.Z-man/pageview but has not seem to
have found the reason yet.
--
James Heilman
MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
The Wik
Dear all,
The next WMF metrics and activities meeting will take place on Thursday,
December 5, 2013 at 7:00 PM UTC (11 AM PST). The IRC channel is
#wikimedia-office on irc.freenode.net and the meeting will be broadcast as
a live YouTube stream.
The current structure of the meeting is:
* Review o
Brad Jorsch (Anomie), 27/11/2013 20:38:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Erik Zachte wrote:
Special:CentralAutoLogin/createSession
Special:CentralAutoLogin/start
You should also remove anything else beginning with Special:CentralAutoLogin/.
Maybe Special:MWOAuth/ and Special:OAuth/ too.
O
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Erik Zachte wrote:
>
> Special:CentralAutoLogin/createSession
> Special:CentralAutoLogin/start
You should also remove anything else beginning with Special:CentralAutoLogin/.
Maybe Special:MWOAuth/ and Special:OAuth/ too.
--
Brad Jorsch (Anomie)
Software Enginee
Thanks all for thinking along.
We have found the cause of the unbelievable growth in page views, and it turns
out to be an bug indeed.
Around August 2013 a site change caused internal housekeeping messages to be
counted as page views by our webstatscollector software.
As the patch was rolled o
Fæ skrev 2013-11-27 15:24
Small error rates are a real challenge. My experience on Commons for
large bot work has been long discussions around quality complaints
where the level of error was *well below 1%*.
Very interesting you also mention this level of problematic articles. We
has found thi
On 27 November 2013 13:43, Anders Wennersten wrote:
...
> And even if this only is relevant for far less then 1% of all generated
> articles it becomes around hundred in total. Many of these cases are quite
> complicated to fix (area of lakes, depths) and there is a debate who should
> fix these,
On sv:wp our main headaches has not been technical problems in bots but
inconsistencies (errors) in sources.
For our lakes the hydrological authorities has in some cases called a
group of nearby and/or conneced lakes with a plural name, like
"Pikelakes", while the mapauthorities call them diff
As well as finding out where this has happened, it would be good to
have some cases of where "bots went bad" explained. My main concern
would be leaving a bot to create thousands of articles but in the
process creating a headache for limited numbers of maintainers, such
as article copy-editors, cat
Hi all,
In Chinese Wikipedia, there're no such bots to create lots of biological
articles - Ranyv, one of my colleagues there, said that Chinese is not a
language adopting the Roman alphabet, thus it is difficult to generate
translation names for those species - unlike Vietnamese and others, they
10 matches
Mail list logo
