Nemo has found this wiki which I find very interesting [1]. it contains
1,68 million articles and seems to be a copy of articles from Lithunian
Wikipedia + some 1,5 million botgenerated articles, with focus on
species (i know from Lsjbot that there are at least some 1,3 M articles
of species
Bot generated articles have been important throughout the history of the
wiki Projects. They are essential to our future. They have also always
been controversial with some editors.
Agreed that not showing them or remaining skeptical rather than learning to
use them better will be a proviso
Sam, I am quite concerned that you would use a public mailing list to
express your displeasure about a specific individual's block on a
particular project, without ensuring that you had your facts straight. It
is unfair not only to the project involved, but to the person who is
blocked: nobody
On 4 February 2014 12:40, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
Before you do that in the future, perhaps it would be a good idea to
understand why a project had to, after years of trying to work with a
valued editor and to mitigate the problems caused, finally remove him from
the project.
On 4 February 2014 08:55, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
Risker, 04/02/2014 13:40:
Sam, I am quite concerned that you would use a public mailing list to
express your displeasure about a specific individual's block [...]
You're putting words in his mouth. Saying, for
Risker, 04/02/2014 13:40:
Sam, I am quite concerned that you would use a public mailing list to
express your displeasure about a specific individual's block [...]
You're putting words in his mouth. Saying, for instance, how sad it is
that about 1 % of the USA population is in jail doesn't
On 4 February 2014 11:32, Stevie Benton stevie.ben...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
...
You may also be interested in a related blog post by Simon
Knighthttp://people.kmi.open.ac.uk/knight/2014/02/wikimedia-uk-strategy-consultation/,
one of the WMUK trustees who has been closely involved in this
On 4 February 2014 14:03, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
..
The vast majority of users who do a lot of bot edits are still merrily
working away on English Wikipedia.
As someone who has made around 3 million automated edits on Commons
and uploaded over 200,000 valuable educational images
On 4 February 2014 10:30, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 February 2014 14:03, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
..
The vast majority of users who do a lot of bot edits are still merrily
working away on English Wikipedia.
As someone who has made around 3 million automated edits on Commons
On 4 February 2014 15:54, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
Risker, out of interest, considering my long track record of useful
bot-work on Commons, would you support my proposal to let Faebot do
some sensible non-controversial work on en.wp or do you think I am a
danger to Wikimedia?
I'd
On 4 February 2014 11:21, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 February 2014 15:54, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
Risker, out of interest, considering my long track record of useful
bot-work on Commons, would you support my proposal to let Faebot do
some sensible non-controversial work on
Perhaps it would be a good idea to understand how bad ArbCom managed the
Rich Farmbrough case by putting him against a slow death that would
ultimately end in a year-long ban handled by a single administrator.
--
*Harold A. Hidalgo*
Editorial Hidalgo Ediciones.
On 4 February 2014 16:42, Harold Hidalgo hah...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps it would be a good idea to understand how bad ArbCom managed the
Rich Farmbrough case by putting him against a slow death that would
ultimately end in a year-long ban handled by a single administrator.
Risker has not
On 4 February 2014 11:45, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 February 2014 16:42, Harold Hidalgo hah...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps it would be a good idea to understand how bad ArbCom managed the
Rich Farmbrough case by putting him against a slow death that would
ultimately end in a
Hello everyone,
Wikimedia UK's board and staff have been working hard over the last few
months on our new Strategic
Planhttps://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/Strategic_plan_2014-2019,
and we have just released the draft for community consultation. We hope
that the model we have
Risker, 04/02/2014 17:59:
doesn't deserve to have his case reheard on this mailing list
Then it would have been useful if you had refrained from issuing a
motion of order against a simple, incidental 7-words mention, making
this (otherwise quiet) thread into a television legal drama with the
On 4 February 2014 16:45, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 February 2014 16:42, Harold Hidalgo hah...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps it would be a good idea to understand how bad ArbCom managed the
... case by putting him against a slow death that would
ultimately end in a year-long ban
On 4 February 2014 12:27, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
Risker, 04/02/2014 17:59:
doesn't deserve to have his case reheard on this mailing list
Then it would have been useful if you had refrained from issuing a motion
of order against a simple, incidental 7-words mention,
On 4 February 2014 17:48, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 February 2014 12:27, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
Risker, 04/02/2014 17:59:
doesn't deserve to have his case reheard on this mailing list
Risker, here's a great tip: If you *really* do not want the case
Hi all,
We are happy to announce that the Board of Trustees approved the new
Trademark Policy this Saturday.[1] The policy is based on a seven-month
consultation with the community to replace our 2009 policy. The new policy
is unconventional in how it provides expansive use of the Wikimedia
A great tip would be to avoid changing this thread into a personal
attack on Risker or anybody else.
Thank you.
Thyge/Sir48
2014-02-04 Fæ fae...@gmail.com:
On 4 February 2014 17:48, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 February 2014 12:27, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 February 2014 20:03, Thyge ltl.pri...@gmail.com wrote:
A great tip would be to avoid changing this thread into a personal
attack on Risker or anybody else.
Thank you.
Thyge/Sir48
Er, that was the point of my tip to Risker.
Fae
___
And a big thank you to legal and the LCA team for their skilled handling of
these issues, including extensive consultations and developing a
community-centric policy. I am proud that we now have such a thoughtful,
open-focused, and yes, unconventional trademark policy for our projects.
best,
23 matches
Mail list logo
