Re: [Wikimedia-l] Affiliations Committee Vice-Chair
Thank you for the information, Bence. Gregory Varnum, congratulations!! Best, Vishnu On Sunday 25 May 2014 03:53 PM, Bence Damokos wrote: Hi all, It is with great pleasure that I can announce that the Affiliations Committee has selected Greg Varnum as its vice chair for the next year. He ran on a platform of helping the committee improve communication with the WMF Board (and other stakeholders) and shifting the committee's work toward a more active capacity building role. You can learn more about Greg at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Affiliations_Committee/Members#Current_members(scroll down). The appointing resolution has been posted at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Affiliations_Committee/Resolutions/Vice_Chair_selection_2014_-_May_2014 Best regards, Bence Damokos, Affiliations Committee @WikimediaAffCom ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Affiliations Committee Vice-Chair
Congratulation Greg Varnum! B/R Nurunnaby Chowdhury Sysop, Bengali Wikipedia Member, IEG, WMF On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Vishnu visdav...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you for the information, Bence. Gregory Varnum, congratulations!! Best, Vishnu On Sunday 25 May 2014 03:53 PM, Bence Damokos wrote: Hi all, It is with great pleasure that I can announce that the Affiliations Committee has selected Greg Varnum as its vice chair for the next year. He ran on a platform of helping the committee improve communication with the WMF Board (and other stakeholders) and shifting the committee's work toward a more active capacity building role. You can learn more about Greg at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Affiliations_Committee/ Members#Current_members(scroll down). The appointing resolution has been posted at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Affiliations_Committee/ Resolutions/Vice_Chair_selection_2014_-_May_2014 Best regards, Bence Damokos, Affiliations Committee @WikimediaAffCom ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe -- *Nurunnaby Chowdhury Hasive* Administrator | Bengali Wikipediahttp://bn.wikipedia.org/wiki/user:nhasive Member | IEG Committee, Wikimedia Foundationhttps://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/People Social Media Interaction Expert | The Daily Prothom-Alohttp://www.prothom-alo.com Bangladesh Ambassador | Open Knowledge Foundation Network http://www.okfn.org Treasurer | Bangladesh Open Source Network (BdOSN) http://www.bdosn.org Task Force Member | Mozilla Bangladesh http://www.mozillabd.org fb.com/nhasive | @nhasive http://www.twitter.com/nhasive | Skype: nhasive | www.nhasive.com ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Slide deck about Wikimedia?
Yves Z, 26/05/2014 02:25: Thanks, is there a way to search Commons by date-range or by file-type? http://tools.wmflabs.org/catscan2/catscan2.php?language=commonsproject=wikimediadepth=1categories=Wikimedia+presentationsns%5B6%5D=1sortby=datedoit=1 I see pdfs, are there odp or ppt decks also? No. https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2089 Nemo ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Slide deck about Wikimedia?
Hello, Hello, Where can I find recent presentations about Wikimedia and what each of the main projects is for? I visited outreach.wikimedia.org but didn't see slides or overviews. Thanks! You might want to check out https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Presentations. It’s probably not super up-to-date, but many folks indicate a way to get the source ODP file (usually by contacting them, SlideShare link, etc). -- Jean-Frédéric ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] FDC recommendation round 2 announced
Dear Lodewijk, thank you! I cannot promise this level of detail when we have many more participants in Round 1 next year (if the FDC process continues), but we'll do our best to aim for detailed feedback. Encouragement from the community means a lot to us, and I appreciate it. best, Dariusz Jemielniak, pundit On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Lodewijk lodew...@effeietsanders.orgwrote: Thanks for the much more detailed reasoning and feedback! This actually gives a good insight why decisions were taken as they were and a major improvement compared to previous rounds. Lodewijk 2014-05-25 0:12 GMT+02:00 Tonmoy Khan tonmoy...@gmail.com: Hello everyone, I thank you all for your encouraging comments on behalf of the FDC. We will be very happy to see our recommendations materialise for the benefit of the Wikimedia movement as a whole. We are grateful to everyone who has been a part of this process so far. Regards Ali Haidar Khan On May 24, 2014 9:06 PM, Lila Tretikov l...@wikimedia.org wrote: Thank you FDC for completing this work and providing valuable feedback. As we continue to improve our planning process and our funding programs we hope to make your work easier as well. Thanks everyone else who has participated with comments and recommendations. Lila On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Samuel Klein s...@wikimedia.org wrote: Dear Dariusz and FDC, Thank you for this fine recommendation. I just read through it for the first time (of many, I expect), and the analyses are clearly getting crisper over time. There are many constructive details packed into each review, and the results are relevant both to the applying organizations, and to how we plan for the future. I am glad to see the analysis of the excellent Wikimedia France proposal. And both the CIS and the Wikimedia Norge proposals seem to have been complicated in their own way, but were handled smoothly. The analysis of WMF's own proposal is clear and rewardingly thorough. (Other organizations may be jealous and ask for a more detailed report next time) A few points I found particularly useful: the focus on areas where we need clearer goals + measures, the detailed feedback on technical changes, and the observation that legal work is a significant part of our budget and work, and central to our mission, but here was lumped in with administration. The last point is indicative of a larger blind spot, I think. I also appreciate the emphasis on regular checks of our work against a strategy, and the need to organize an effective transition to new strategic goals. The suggestions for a community-led strategy advisory group, and for a pool of global metrics for [cross-]evaluation, are well considered. Both could also make the FDC's work easier in the future... Congratulations on this work. And good luck to those FDC advisors meeting over the coming days. Sam. On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Dariusz Jemielniak dar...@alk.edu.pl wrote: Hello friends, The Funds Dissemination Committee meets twice annually to help make decisions about how to effectively allocate movement funds to achieve the Wikimedia movement's mission, vision, and strategy. [1] On behalf of the committee, I am pleased to announce that Round 2 2013-2014 recommendations to the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees have now been posted on Meta [2]: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/FDC_portal/FDC_recommendations/2013-2014_round2 The WMF Board will make their decision on these recommendations by 1 July 2014. For the second round of this fiscal year, the committee received four proposals. [3] These four proposals came from two chapters, WMF and one non-Wikimedia organization, totaling requests of '''$1.56''' million USD. Prior to our face-to-face deliberations in Frankfurt from 21st-24th May, the FDC reviewed the proposals in careful detail, aided by staff assessments and analysis on programs, finances, grant compliance and history, as well as community comments on the proposals. Staff presented an overview of these findings to the FDC during the deliberations. The FDC and FDC staff also asked clarifying questions to the entities on the proposal form discussion pages during the four-week community review period (and prior to the publishing of staff assessments), and observed the discussions about the proposals. The committee thanks all organizations that submitted proposals, as it required significant effort to both create the proposal and to respond to the questions and feedback from the community, FDC, and FDC staff. We sincerely
Re: [Wikimedia-l] FDC recommendation round 2 announced
After reading the report I really hope that the FDC continues prospering and growing. There are very insightful recommendations to be found there and I hope they are put into practice. I also think that this kind of report reinforces and shows in full splendor the spirit of community participation and co-governance that many of us we feel identified with. Thanks for having shown how a good report should look like. Micru On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Dariusz Jemielniak dar...@alk.edu.plwrote: Dear Lodewijk, thank you! I cannot promise this level of detail when we have many more participants in Round 1 next year (if the FDC process continues), but we'll do our best to aim for detailed feedback. Encouragement from the community means a lot to us, and I appreciate it. best, Dariusz Jemielniak, pundit On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Lodewijk lodew...@effeietsanders.org wrote: Thanks for the much more detailed reasoning and feedback! This actually gives a good insight why decisions were taken as they were and a major improvement compared to previous rounds. Lodewijk 2014-05-25 0:12 GMT+02:00 Tonmoy Khan tonmoy...@gmail.com: Hello everyone, I thank you all for your encouraging comments on behalf of the FDC. We will be very happy to see our recommendations materialise for the benefit of the Wikimedia movement as a whole. We are grateful to everyone who has been a part of this process so far. Regards Ali Haidar Khan On May 24, 2014 9:06 PM, Lila Tretikov l...@wikimedia.org wrote: Thank you FDC for completing this work and providing valuable feedback. As we continue to improve our planning process and our funding programs we hope to make your work easier as well. Thanks everyone else who has participated with comments and recommendations. Lila On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Samuel Klein s...@wikimedia.org wrote: Dear Dariusz and FDC, Thank you for this fine recommendation. I just read through it for the first time (of many, I expect), and the analyses are clearly getting crisper over time. There are many constructive details packed into each review, and the results are relevant both to the applying organizations, and to how we plan for the future. I am glad to see the analysis of the excellent Wikimedia France proposal. And both the CIS and the Wikimedia Norge proposals seem to have been complicated in their own way, but were handled smoothly. The analysis of WMF's own proposal is clear and rewardingly thorough. (Other organizations may be jealous and ask for a more detailed report next time) A few points I found particularly useful: the focus on areas where we need clearer goals + measures, the detailed feedback on technical changes, and the observation that legal work is a significant part of our budget and work, and central to our mission, but here was lumped in with administration. The last point is indicative of a larger blind spot, I think. I also appreciate the emphasis on regular checks of our work against a strategy, and the need to organize an effective transition to new strategic goals. The suggestions for a community-led strategy advisory group, and for a pool of global metrics for [cross-]evaluation, are well considered. Both could also make the FDC's work easier in the future... Congratulations on this work. And good luck to those FDC advisors meeting over the coming days. Sam. On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Dariusz Jemielniak dar...@alk.edu.pl wrote: Hello friends, The Funds Dissemination Committee meets twice annually to help make decisions about how to effectively allocate movement funds to achieve the Wikimedia movement's mission, vision, and strategy. [1] On behalf of the committee, I am pleased to announce that Round 2 2013-2014 recommendations to the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees have now been posted on Meta [2]: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/FDC_portal/FDC_recommendations/2013-2014_round2 The WMF Board will make their decision on these recommendations by 1 July 2014. For the second round of this fiscal year, the committee received four proposals. [3] These four proposals came from two chapters, WMF and one non-Wikimedia organization, totaling requests of '''$1.56''' million USD. Prior to our face-to-face deliberations in Frankfurt from 21st-24th May, the FDC reviewed the proposals in careful detail, aided by staff assessments and analysis on programs, finances, grant compliance and history, as well as community comments on the proposals.
[Wikimedia-l] New Chair of the Supervisory Board – the 14th WMDE General Assembly in retrospect
Hi all, yesterday, Wikimedia Deutschland’s 14th General Assembly was held in Frankfurt am Main. In addition to the presentation of the strategic planning and several amendments to the articles of the association’s bylaws, the agenda included among other things reports of the Executive Director, the Supervisory Board and volunteer auditing committee. Of course, the transition process and the succession of Pavel Richter announced this week were widely discussed. We are a young association and the change in the position of Executive Director, which has been shaped by Pavel for many years, is a new experience for all of us. Over the coming months, the process of succession is going to entail a lot of work and Pavel will be a part of it. Obviously, first of all we have to mutually deliberate on the procedure and the specific schedule – a process in which we are going to include as many people as possible and whose opinions we are going to take very seriously. We will report on any concrete actions as soon as possible. Unfortunately, Nikolas Becker, who held the Chairman position of the Supervisory Board for the past six months, will not take an active part in the transition process. He resigned yesterday. As a result, we gathered as the supervisory board on this Sunday in order to elect a new Chair. I am glad that my Board colleagues expressed their confidence in me and as of now entrusted me with the presidency of the supervisory board. I am well aware of the immense responsibility and, with a clear focus on the future, accepted it yesterday. I want to thank Nikolas for everything he has accomplished over the past years – not only as Chair but also as a member of the Supervisory Board and for the association in general. In the name of the Supervisory Board we thanked him yesterday in Frankfurt. As usual, there will also be a protocol for this general meeting of members. I do not want to anticipate the minutes, as long as they are being completed. Yet, I would like to give a short personal overview at this point: There were six requests for amendments to articles of the association’s bylaws (a seventh has been withdrawn). All six of them were accepted with clear majorities. The Supervisory Board’s term of office was extended from one to two years. A leave of absence from the Supervisory Board is now possible, as is a lump-sum for refunding of honorary expenses according to German customs. Furthermore, it was formally clarified that members of the Supervisory Board must also be members of the association. In the future, it will be much easier to terminate supporting memberships. And finally: The wording regarding the quorum to hold an exceptional general assembly has been changed from “members” to “active members”. Besides the amendments to articles of the association, the general assembly confirmed the Supervisory Board’s structure according to departments. For more details to all these and further points I want to refer to the minutes mentioned above, which are to be published soon. I am convinced of Wikimedia Deutschland being in a stable position. It is up to us to shape our association over the coming years together. This involves self criticism, or at least the realization that a neutral point of view is helpful in pretty much all circumstances in life. That is why I am glad that the general meeting approved the supervisory board’s request and that we will now start an external governance review to gather different expertise and new insight. Within Wikipedia, this is common practise and a strength that helps Wikipedia get better. In my opinion, the same applies to Wikimedia Deutschland: our willingness to improve is our strength. Best regards, Tim -- Tim Moritz Hector Chair of the board Wikimedia Deutschland e. V. +49 (0)160 - 36 16 234 tim-moritz.hec...@wikimedia.de Wikimedia Deutschland e. V. | Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24 | D-10963 Berlin Tel.: +49 (0)30 - 219 158 260 http://www.wikimedia.de Stellen Sie sich eine Welt vor, in der jeder Mensch auf der Erde freien Zugang zum gesamten menschlichen Wissen hat. Das ist, was wir machen. Helfen Sie uns dabei! http://spenden.wikimedia.de Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That's what we're doing. Help us make it reality! http://spenden.wikimedia.de Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985. ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
Re: [Wikimedia-l] New Chair of the Supervisory Board – the 14th WMDE General Assembly in retrospect
Dear Tim Congratulations on your new role. And all the best! Michael Michael Maggs Chair, Wikimedia UK On 26 May 2014, at 13:38, Tim Moritz Hector tim-moritz.hec...@wikimedia.de wrote: Hi all, yesterday, Wikimedia Deutschland’s 14th General Assembly was held in Frankfurt am Main. In addition to the presentation of the strategic planning and several amendments to the articles of the association’s bylaws, the agenda included among other things reports of the Executive Director, the Supervisory Board and volunteer auditing committee. Of course, the transition process and the succession of Pavel Richter announced this week were widely discussed. We are a young association and the change in the position of Executive Director, which has been shaped by Pavel for many years, is a new experience for all of us. Over the coming months, the process of succession is going to entail a lot of work and Pavel will be a part of it. Obviously, first of all we have to mutually deliberate on the procedure and the specific schedule – a process in which we are going to include as many people as possible and whose opinions we are going to take very seriously. We will report on any concrete actions as soon as possible. Unfortunately, Nikolas Becker, who held the Chairman position of the Supervisory Board for the past six months, will not take an active part in the transition process. He resigned yesterday. As a result, we gathered as the supervisory board on this Sunday in order to elect a new Chair. I am glad that my Board colleagues expressed their confidence in me and as of now entrusted me with the presidency of the supervisory board. I am well aware of the immense responsibility and, with a clear focus on the future, accepted it yesterday. I want to thank Nikolas for everything he has accomplished over the past years – not only as Chair but also as a member of the Supervisory Board and for the association in general. In the name of the Supervisory Board we thanked him yesterday in Frankfurt. As usual, there will also be a protocol for this general meeting of members. I do not want to anticipate the minutes, as long as they are being completed. Yet, I would like to give a short personal overview at this point: There were six requests for amendments to articles of the association’s bylaws (a seventh has been withdrawn). All six of them were accepted with clear majorities. The Supervisory Board’s term of office was extended from one to two years. A leave of absence from the Supervisory Board is now possible, as is a lump-sum for refunding of honorary expenses according to German customs. Furthermore, it was formally clarified that members of the Supervisory Board must also be members of the association. In the future, it will be much easier to terminate supporting memberships. And finally: The wording regarding the quorum to hold an exceptional general assembly has been changed from “members” to “active members”. Besides the amendments to articles of the association, the general assembly confirmed the Supervisory Board’s structure according to departments. For more details to all these and further points I want to refer to the minutes mentioned above, which are to be published soon. I am convinced of Wikimedia Deutschland being in a stable position. It is up to us to shape our association over the coming years together. This involves self criticism, or at least the realization that a neutral point of view is helpful in pretty much all circumstances in life. That is why I am glad that the general meeting approved the supervisory board’s request and that we will now start an external governance review to gather different expertise and new insight. Within Wikipedia, this is common practise and a strength that helps Wikipedia get better. In my opinion, the same applies to Wikimedia Deutschland: our willingness to improve is our strength. Best regards, Tim -- Tim Moritz Hector Chair of the board Wikimedia Deutschland e. V. +49 (0)160 - 36 16 234 tim-moritz.hec...@wikimedia.de Wikimedia Deutschland e. V. | Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24 | D-10963 Berlin Tel.: +49 (0)30 - 219 158 260 http://www.wikimedia.de Stellen Sie sich eine Welt vor, in der jeder Mensch auf der Erde freien Zugang zum gesamten menschlichen Wissen hat. Das ist, was wir machen. Helfen Sie uns dabei! http://spenden.wikimedia.de Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That's what we're doing. Help us make it reality! http://spenden.wikimedia.de Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer
Re: [Wikimedia-l] COM:IDENT?
Thanks all for your opinions, suggestions and advice. I was away due to a personal emergency; just back home today. I read all the responses above, including Pierre-selim's advise on how to handle such cases in future. I agree, and my intention was not to ignore in Commons discussions and make a commons is broken rant as Pleclown complained above. I was in the midst of switching off my computer and run as one of my relative just admitted in hospital. The repeated revert on that page increased my blood pressure and I forwarded it to here as I know I can't participate in that thread for at least a few days. I disagree with Pierre-selim's opinion that In the end I just think we are having this thread because of the topic being related to nudity (which is clearly a not consensual topic in our communities, probably because it is cultural) and not really because of any real breach of privacy. As a husband of a woman who had undergone TAH-BSO at the age of twenty (ten years before our marriage), I'm well aware of the value of our reproductive system and the importance of educating common people about the healthy maintenance of them. I know how photographs are more helpful than graphical illustrations in some occasions. But we should be more careful on verifying whether the subjects are fully consented in such cases. Moreover, there is no need to reveal the identity of non notable persons in such cases. (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Smoking_Crack.jpg is another similar case where no relation to nudity; but clear real breach of privacy. There people even tried to revert Odder. Finally I had to bring it at AN to revedelete other versions. I still believe such a picture is not good for our projects as we have no evidence of consent and the person can be easily identifiable from the external links.) Now I (glad to) see Russavia did some homework and made an alert to another crat and (as a result) most links are removed. ( https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MichaelMaggs#Paedophile_advocate_needs_blocking ). Regards, Jee On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:59 AM, Chris Keating chriskeatingw...@gmail.comwrote: Though in this case it does seem that Commons has given sound advice that any photos submitted should be accompanied by a model release. If only more photos on Commons had model releases! On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Chris Keating chriskeatingw...@gmail.comwrote: @Risker: I was thinking the same, hence my disagreement with Odder's decision. But I've visited the linked website (NSFW) and one can only assume that the person on the pictures is fully aware of the implication of said photos on the internet and willing to see them diffused. I don't think there are pictures of someone on the internet can in any circumstances imply that person has given their consent for those pictures to be on the internet. Even if it is clear that the person concerned gave permission for the picture to be taken, that is no evidence that they have given any consent for those pictures to be circulated. Chris ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/guidelineswikimedi...@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
