Hi yana,
You are right, there is no hostility in my message. You know that
wikimedians are very sensitive to follow existing law (especially
copyright), and to provide and ask references all the time :)
@labs
Could you please provide a reference why labs can be misused?
@understanding
Hi all,
please spread the word: Tools only on Tool Labs from July 1
About one year ago, we, Wikimedia Deutschland e. V., announced June 30th
as the deadline of the Toolserver migration (Roadmap at [1]). This
deadline is approaching. The Toolserver will stop working on June 30th.
What will happen
Thanks for sharing, Tilman!
(These are really useful pages, and nice to see them continue to be
maintained).
Best regards,
Bence
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Tilman Bayer tba...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Minutes and slides from last week's quarterly review of the
Foundation's Mobile
On 06/04/2014 02:36 AM, rupert THURNER wrote:
@labs
Could you please provide a reference why labs can be misused?
The problem with Zero-rating (all of) labs is that there is no
constraint on the actual nature of the content that is provided there.
While we /do/ have rules about what is and is
Hi,
Amical is just drafting its very first collaboration with a Hospital, in
order to improve MED articles on ca.wiki
The doctors comittée asked us, in order to optimize efforts, if we knew
which are the most visited articles medicine related, so they can start
putting their efforts there
Do
A question to Yana et al.:
Is there any reason for the WMF to promote/sign Zero agreements instead of
the local chapters/user groups?
I mean, if that ability was subsidized to the chapters we could have a
different strategy depending on the country, because:
- in some places the benefits of
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:54 AM, David Cuenca dacu...@gmail.com wrote:
A question to Yana et al.:
Is there any reason for the WMF to promote/sign Zero agreements instead of
the local chapters/user groups?
I mean, if that ability was subsidized to the chapters we could have a
different
Àlex Hinojo, 04/06/2014 15:35:
Do you know if there is a tool for that?
- tracking which are the most visited articles in a category tree on a wiki
https://tools.wmflabs.org/glamtools/treeviews/
https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikiviewstats/ (if you're lucky and they share
a title prefix; can work
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
How would an affiliate have the ability to sign any agreements for the
delivery of WMF content? The agreements cover access to WMF-owned websites.
I can see local affiliates being helpful with translation, advice and
Oh thanks! Didn't know it was moved to wmflabs and improved so well!
2014-06-04 16:06 GMT+02:00 Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com:
Àlex Hinojo, 04/06/2014 15:35:
Do you know if there is a tool for that?
- tracking which are the most visited articles in a category tree on a
wiki
On Thu, 05 Jun 2014 00:56:07 +1000, billinghurst billinghu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Just wondering whether there is going to be a bigger announcement of
Wikimania 2015 going to be in Mexico City, than its appearance in the
WM2014 programme
https://wikimania2014.wikimedia.org/wiki/Programme
If
Just wondering whether there is going to be a bigger announcement of
Wikimania 2015 going to be in Mexico City, than its appearance in the
WM2014 programme
https://wikimania2014.wikimedia.org/wiki/Programme
If the decision is announced on [[m:Wikimania 2015]] by the green text, I
think that is a
Hello Alex,
WikiProject Medicine on English discusses this issue in various ways.
Consider posting this message on that project's talk page.
The most prominent international project is with the Translation Task
Force, in which there is a coordinated international effort to get 80
medical
??? writes:
On 02/06/2014 21:14, Mike Godwin wrote:
Google has a clear purpose too, and it was no defense. Plus, there is
a public-interest argument in favor of eschewing the erasure of true,
accurate public data that happens to be old.
There is nothing in the judgement about erasing true,
Whatever the right to be forgotten may turn out to be, it's not
about publication of previously unpublished information. Ergo, it's
not about invasion of privacy, broadly speaking. The opinion makes
clear that one can publish true, accurate, already-published
information and nevertheless be
+1. These are an amazing resource for understanding what's happening.
Thanks to Tilman and the teams who put these together.
Is there any thought of making metrics updates more machine-readable,
exposing data/metrics/timelines? Right now the excellent data is
flattened into slides, and then
Chris writes:
I think there's a philosophical issue about privacy here. As far as I can
see the ECJ interprets privacy as the right to enjoy a private life, and
sees any party holding a significant amount of data about a private
individual without good reason as a potential infringement on
Àlex Hinojo, 04/06/2014 16:50:
Oh thanks! Didn't know it was moved to wmflabs and improved so well!
Yes, that's thanks to the renewed efforts by User:Henrik
(stats.grok.se):
https://bitbucket.org/magnusmanske/glamtools/issue/3/treeviews-unchained
Nemo
(note any comments here are entirely my own personal opinion)
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Mike Godwin mnemo...@gmail.com wrote:
The ECJ said the
right to be forgotten applies when the data aggregated appear to be
inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant, or excessive in relation
to
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any thought of making metrics updates more machine-readable,
exposing data/metrics/timelines? Right now the excellent data is
flattened into slides, and then further flattened into a single pdf.
If anyone is
Hi Wikimedia-l,
Just to say hello and introduce myself to the list. I'm a research professional
seven years experience hoping to break into the legal field. I'm not 25 or
anything like that though. I've done other stuff in my life, and I am
middle-aged. How do I come here to the list? I was a
I think having a two part RfC with the first part discussing the minimum
conditions the community would like VE to meet before having a discussion about
more widely enabling VE in the second portion of the RfC makes sense. This
raises the possibility that as VE becomes more and more functional
(META: I have to wonder why Wikimedia-l was chosen as the venue for this
conversation. Visual Editor is deployed and working in quite a few of our
projects, including very active ones and difficult ones such as the
right-to-left Hebrew Wikipedia; this discussion, then, is very much about
the
Asaf, I agree in some ways. ENWP's email list is a backwater though, and since
the discussion that got me thinking about this issue started on this list it
made sense to me to keep it on this list. Also, other wikis' experiences with
VE are relevant. My personal experience with VE has most
Hoi,
There should not be separate standards for Commons and any Wikipedia is
surely what you mean...
Thanks,
GerardM
On 4 June 2014 22:17, ENWP Pine deyntest...@hotmail.com wrote:
Asaf, I agree in some ways. ENWP's email list is a backwater though, and
since the discussion that got me
GerardM,
Yes, if Asaf or someone else wanted to have a low-frequency discussion about VE
on Hebrew Wikipedia or some other wiki on this list I think that would be ok
too. IMO this is a high-traffic general-purpose list, but Asaf is right that
taking discussions to a more specific place is
Congrats!
On 2 June 2014 15:50, Amy Vossbrinck avossbri...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Very nice work!!
Take good care, Amy
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 8:10 AM, Cristian Consonni kikkocrist...@gmail.com
wrote:
Today, our organization celebrates anniversary - 5 years from the date
of
Trillium Corsage wrote:
Just to say hello and introduce myself to the list. I'm a research
professional seven years experience hoping to break into the legal field.
I'm not 25 or anything like that though. I've done other stuff in my
life, and I am middle-aged. How do I come here to the list? I
28 matches
Mail list logo