Re: [Wikimedia-l] WMF office location and remodel

2015-04-09 Thread Garfield Byrd
Hi Pine,

I have answered your questions in your email.

Regards,

Garfield

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:38 AM, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Garfield,

 Ok, follow up questions:

 * Does WMF have a plan to keep the Foundation and its essential functions
 operational if, say, the San Francisco main building all SF staff are
 completely offline and unreachable by phone for a week after an earthquake?

Yes, we have a plan in place in case the building in San Francisco is
unavailable.  All San Francisco staff will not be offline for a week after
an earthquake.  Not all staff live in San Francisco, and Loma Prieta showed
that even a major earthquake does not take the entire San Francisco Bay
Area offline.  So essential functions will continue even after an
earthquake.

In addition, even though many of our staff are in San Francisco, we do have
staff in many other states and 18 countries.

* Would there be worthwhile advantages to establishing a second main office
in someplace like the US east coast or Europe?

We have tried to setup a center of activity in other states and it did not
prove to be worthwhile, as staff preferred to work from home or other
locations.  So it was an an additional cost with any additional benefit. It
is my understanding that having an office outside the United States creates
complications for Wikipedia and the other Wiki projects in the area of
content protection.

 Thanks, and please reply when it's convenient for you.

 I'll follow up offline with HR about talent pool questions.

 Thanks,

 Pine
 On Apr 8, 2015 5:16 PM, Garfield Byrd gb...@wikimedia.org wrote:

 Hi Pine,

 If the Foundation decides to move, the cost of making the space usable
 for our staff is not a recoverable cost from the building owner.

 At this point, WMF is not planning on moving out of the San Francisco
 market area.  We will be doing our best to manage cost when we renew our
 lease or move. The advantages of having good access to talented people and
 organizations WMF interacts with far outweigh any advantages to moving to a
 lower cost location outside of the San Francisco market area.

 Regards,

 Garfield

 On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Garfield,

 I'm asking this on Wikimedia-l because a number of Wikimedians have
 noted the expensiveness of the San Francisco area including its high cost
 of living for staff, employer competition for engineering talent, and
 associated high salaries for WMF employees.

 I see on
 http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/foundation/8/8a/RFP_for_Real_Estate_Services.pdf
 that WMF is considering relocating its offices when its current main office
 lease expires.

 Questions:

 What happens to the remodel expenses that WMF is paying for at its
 current location? If WMF vacates the premesis, will it be compensated for
 the remodel by the building owner?

 I hope that WMF is contemplating fully exiting the San Francisco market
 area in order to economize, get better value for our donors' funds, have
 less competition for talent, and lower costs of living for staff. Is this
 being considered?

 Thanks very much,

 Pine




 --
 Garfield Byrd
 Chief of Finance and Administration
 Wikimedia Foundation
 415.839.6885 ext 6787
 415.882.0495 (fax)
 www.wikimediafoundation.org

 Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in
 the sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality!

 *https://donate.wikimedia.org https://donate.wikimedia.org/*




-- 
Garfield Byrd
Chief of Finance and Administration
Wikimedia Foundation
415.839.6885 ext 6787
415.882.0495 (fax)
www.wikimediafoundation.org

Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in
the sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality!

*https://donate.wikimedia.org https://donate.wikimedia.org/*
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] WMF office location and remodel

2015-04-09 Thread Lila Tretikov
All --

As a matter of strategy we should be leveraging our open-source roots more
as we grow. This means distributed, loosely-coupled teams. We know from
software industry history that distributed teams work best when they are
*entirely* distributed.  We are working on some structures that will allow
teams to either be entirely distributed or mostly co-located, consistent
with what we know about best outcomes. In SF, remote working is not very
common as the software companies demand people to be on-site and we have an
advantage with remote talent, but it is also not for everyone as it can be
isolating. Net-net.. before we worry about growth and costs we need to
worry about effectiveness, but we are thinking about this.

Thanks,
Lila

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 9 April 2015 at 16:47, Garfield Byrd gb...@wikimedia.org wrote:
  Hi Fae,
 
  We have 215 staff in total, with a hub of activity in San Francisco and
  other staff in several other states and 18 countries.  So I agree
 talented
  people can be found globally and WMF does hire the best talent it can
 find
  wherever they are located.  At this point adding offices in other
 locations
  add cost without any benefits to the community or the Wikimedia
  Foundation.  We also do not have the luxury of Mozilla's $300 million
  budget that can support a London office or Microsoft's billions to have a
  globally distributed workforce with offices.  So we are not closing the
  door to anything. Based on our test project of trying to develop centers
 of
  activity in other parts of the United States there is no need for
  additional offices. We do need and will continue to hire a globally
  distributed staff of talented people to support our global community of
  talented volunteers.

 Thanks for the response, it makes sense to me.

 I agree with avoiding additional offices unless there is a very good
 business case. Back in the late 1990s I was part of a small
 consultancy where we chose to eliminate having a central office
 altogether. It was a strange thing to try back last century, but
 moving more of the administrative functions into the virtual working
 space, and arming employees with excellent teamworking tools they can
 use from home (or bookable office spaces locally) has become part of
 the ordinary world of work these days.

 WMF development happens this way already, and you writing here shows
 that management/executive level folks are comfortable and skilled with
 virtual spaces. It would be jolly interesting if the WMF were seen to
 try out more virtual methods in other parts of its operation, and find
 meaningful ways of reporting on benefits or avoidable costs. I see
 this as part of the learning organization... Maybe a topic for another
 thread at some point. :-)

 Fae

 ___
 Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
 https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
 Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
 mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wikimedia-l] [Wikimedia Announcements] This Month in GLAM: March 2015

2015-04-09 Thread The 'This Month in GLAM' team
*This Month in GLAM* is a monthly newsletter documenting recent happenings
within the GLAM project, such as content donations, residencies, events and
more. GLAM is an acronym of *G*alleries, *L*ibraries, *A*rchives and *M*useums.
You can find more information on the project at glamwiki.org.
*This Month in GLAM – Issue III, Volume V – March 2015*
--

Upcoming: GLAM-WIKI 2015 from 10 to 12 April 2015 in the Netherlands:
http://nl.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM-WIKI_2015

For who goes there, see you at the conference!

--

Africa report: Closing the gap of the Global South
http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Newsletter/March_2015/Contents/Africa_report

Belgium report: Gendergap and Belgiumgap
http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Newsletter/March_2015/Contents/Belgium_report

Catalan areas report: One day at the radio
http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Newsletter/March_2015/Contents/Catalan_areas_report

France report: A very busy month!
http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Newsletter/March_2015/Contents/France_report

Germany report: 1 topic, 2 talks, 3 hours
http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Newsletter/March_2015/Contents/Germany_report

Italy report: Agreements with national cultural institutions and
professional associations
http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Newsletter/March_2015/Contents/Italy_report

Mexico report: Wiki rides the subway editathon and second edition of the
Editatona gender gap marathon
http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Newsletter/March_2015/Contents/Mexico_report

Netherlands report: Nature, Art, Feminism and a GLAM-WIKI conference
http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Newsletter/March_2015/Contents/Netherlands_report


Poland report: Six months in
http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Newsletter/March_2015/Contents/Poland_report

Spain report: Women's edit-a-thons, Workshops and Miguel Delibes
http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Newsletter/March_2015/Contents/Spain_report

Sweden report: Fashion; BARK; Council of Central Museums
http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Newsletter/March_2015/Contents/Sweden_report

UK report: GLAM activities in the UK
http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Newsletter/March_2015/Contents/UK_report

USA report: Wikipedia in Philadelphia  New York
http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Newsletter/March_2015/Contents/USA_report

Open Access report: Wikimania Open Access policy; Wikimania; Wikipedia
Science Conference; Punch-card microfluidics
http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Newsletter/March_2015/Contents/Open_Access_report

Calendar: April's GLAM events
http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Newsletter/March_2015/Contents/Events



--


Single page view
http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Newsletter/March_2015/Single

Twitter
http://twitter.com/ThisMonthinGLAM

Add your story / Work on the next edition
http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Newsletter/Newsroom


-- 
The *This Month in GLAM* team
http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Newsletter
___
Please note: all replies sent to this mailing list will be immediately directed 
to Wikimedia-l, the public mailing list of the Wikimedia community. For more 
information about Wikimedia-l:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
___
WikimediaAnnounce-l mailing list
wikimediaannounc...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaannounce-l
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] WMF office location and remodel

2015-04-09 Thread
On 9 April 2015 at 16:47, Garfield Byrd gb...@wikimedia.org wrote:
 Hi Fae,

 We have 215 staff in total, with a hub of activity in San Francisco and
 other staff in several other states and 18 countries.  So I agree talented
 people can be found globally and WMF does hire the best talent it can find
 wherever they are located.  At this point adding offices in other locations
 add cost without any benefits to the community or the Wikimedia
 Foundation.  We also do not have the luxury of Mozilla's $300 million
 budget that can support a London office or Microsoft's billions to have a
 globally distributed workforce with offices.  So we are not closing the
 door to anything. Based on our test project of trying to develop centers of
 activity in other parts of the United States there is no need for
 additional offices. We do need and will continue to hire a globally
 distributed staff of talented people to support our global community of
 talented volunteers.

Thanks for the response, it makes sense to me.

I agree with avoiding additional offices unless there is a very good
business case. Back in the late 1990s I was part of a small
consultancy where we chose to eliminate having a central office
altogether. It was a strange thing to try back last century, but
moving more of the administrative functions into the virtual working
space, and arming employees with excellent teamworking tools they can
use from home (or bookable office spaces locally) has become part of
the ordinary world of work these days.

WMF development happens this way already, and you writing here shows
that management/executive level folks are comfortable and skilled with
virtual spaces. It would be jolly interesting if the WMF were seen to
try out more virtual methods in other parts of its operation, and find
meaningful ways of reporting on benefits or avoidable costs. I see
this as part of the learning organization... Maybe a topic for another
thread at some point. :-)

Fae

___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] WMF office location and remodel

2015-04-09 Thread Pine W
Hi Garfield,

Ok, follow up questions:

* Does WMF have a plan to keep the Foundation and its essential functions
operational if, say, the San Francisco main building all SF staff are
completely offline and unreachable by phone for a week after an earthquake?

* Would there be worthwhile advantages to establishing a second main office
in someplace like the US east coast or Europe?

Thanks, and please reply when it's convenient for you.

I'll follow up offline with HR about talent pool questions.

Thanks,

Pine
On Apr 8, 2015 5:16 PM, Garfield Byrd gb...@wikimedia.org wrote:

 Hi Pine,

 If the Foundation decides to move, the cost of making the space usable for
 our staff is not a recoverable cost from the building owner.

 At this point, WMF is not planning on moving out of the San Francisco
 market area.  We will be doing our best to manage cost when we renew our
 lease or move. The advantages of having good access to talented people and
 organizations WMF interacts with far outweigh any advantages to moving to a
 lower cost location outside of the San Francisco market area.

 Regards,

 Garfield

 On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Garfield,

 I'm asking this on Wikimedia-l because a number of Wikimedians have noted
 the expensiveness of the San Francisco area including its high cost of
 living for staff, employer competition for engineering talent, and
 associated high salaries for WMF employees.

 I see on
 http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/foundation/8/8a/RFP_for_Real_Estate_Services.pdf
 that WMF is considering relocating its offices when its current main office
 lease expires.

 Questions:

 What happens to the remodel expenses that WMF is paying for at its
 current location? If WMF vacates the premesis, will it be compensated for
 the remodel by the building owner?

 I hope that WMF is contemplating fully exiting the San Francisco market
 area in order to economize, get better value for our donors' funds, have
 less competition for talent, and lower costs of living for staff. Is this
 being considered?

 Thanks very much,

 Pine




 --
 Garfield Byrd
 Chief of Finance and Administration
 Wikimedia Foundation
 415.839.6885 ext 6787
 415.882.0495 (fax)
 www.wikimediafoundation.org

 Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in
 the sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality!

 *https://donate.wikimedia.org https://donate.wikimedia.org/*

___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] My article on Wikipedia Zero and Net Neutrality, just out today at Reason.com

2015-04-09 Thread Mike Godwin
People who are interested in the history of my views on network
neutrality may find fodder here in this 2006 article I wrote on behalf
of the American Library Association.

http://www.ala.org/offices/sites/ala.org.offices/files/content/oitp/publications/issuebriefs/A%20Library%20Perspectiv.pdf

To the extent my views have evolved since them (and I'm inclined to
say they haven't changed much), this is due partly to my years of work
for Wikimedia Foundation and partly to my work on internet policy in
the developing world.

See, for example, how I dealt with the issue in developing the Great
Charter for Cambodian Internet Freedom.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/great-charter-cambodian-internet-freedom-mike-godwin.


--Mike

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 5:35 AM, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:


 On 9 April 2015 at 00:51, Mike Godwin mnemo...@gmail.com wrote:

 http://reason.com/archives/2015/04/08/nothing-but-net


 --Mike



 I'm not convinced you are helping your case with your choice of venue.


 --
 geni

___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] My article on Wikipedia Zero and Net Neutrality, just out today at Reason.com

2015-04-09 Thread Mike Godwin
I'm not convinced you offered me a better choice of venue, geni. (If
you did, I missed the email.) But, then, I'm also not convinced that
worrying about venue -- rather than, say, focusing on publishing with
a journal that would give me the space to develop an argument at some
length.

I'm not well-positioned to game out the way every snarky commenter on
the sidelines will interpret anything I write or where I manage to get
published.  But it's worth noting that the same journal asked me to
make the case for Obama's re-election back in 2012, which is also
something you wouldn't expect.

We may reasonably expect, given the choice of venue, that my argument
will be considered quite heterodox to its regular readers, which is
actually good, not bad. (Other pieces by other authors have decried
net neutrality in general--I didn't do this, however, and they knew I
wouldn't.)


--Mike




On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 5:35 AM, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:


 On 9 April 2015 at 00:51, Mike Godwin mnemo...@gmail.com wrote:

 http://reason.com/archives/2015/04/08/nothing-but-net


 --Mike



 I'm not convinced you are helping your case with your choice of venue.


 --
 geni

___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] WMF office location and remodel

2015-04-09 Thread Garfield Byrd
Hi Fae,

We have 215 staff in total, with a hub of activity in San Francisco and
other staff in several other states and 18 countries.  So I agree talented
people can be found globally and WMF does hire the best talent it can find
wherever they are located.  At this point adding offices in other locations
add cost without any benefits to the community or the Wikimedia
Foundation.  We also do not have the luxury of Mozilla's $300 million
budget that can support a London office or Microsoft's billions to have a
globally distributed workforce with offices.  So we are not closing the
door to anything. Based on our test project of trying to develop centers of
activity in other parts of the United States there is no need for
additional offices. We do need and will continue to hire a globally
distributed staff of talented people to support our global community of
talented volunteers.

Regards,

Garfield

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 9 April 2015 at 01:16, Garfield Byrd gb...@wikimedia.org wrote:
  ... The advantages of having good access to talented people and
  organizations WMF interacts with far outweigh any advantages to moving
 to a
  lower cost location outside of the San Francisco market area.

 I find the world-view expressed here slightly odd to read, perhaps
 because I am more European than American in background.

 My background includes working for long periods with many companies in
 the U.S. (such as Microsoft) and we managed to do that perfectly with
 a handful of employees in a Seattle office, and most developers and
 internal operations such as HR, finance etc. in Europe (very few of
 these people ever had a need or desire to talk directly with customers
 or partner organizations). It was easy enough for me to visit the U.S.
 a couple of times a year when there was a lot going on there, and work
 on a daily basis within a lively virtual team spread out in offices
 across London, Paris and New York.

 Talented people can be found in many places including San Francisco,
 and though Google is incredibly important, there many other critically
 important potential open knowledge partners without headquarters in SF
 (Europeana springs to mind). Even Mozilla has a very nice office to
 work with here in London. The idea that having all functions in SF has
 advantages that far outweigh all other considerations seems to
 over-egg the case, perhaps it would be a good thing to leave the door
 open a crack for alternative ways of working to be possible in a far
 future.

 Fae

 ___
 Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
 https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
 Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
 mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe




-- 
Garfield Byrd
Chief of Finance and Administration
Wikimedia Foundation
415.839.6885 ext 6787
415.882.0495 (fax)
www.wikimediafoundation.org

Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in
the sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality!

*https://donate.wikimedia.org https://donate.wikimedia.org/*
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] WMF office location and remodel

2015-04-09 Thread Marc A. Pelletier
On 15-04-09 04:52 PM, Lila Tretikov wrote:
 but it is also not for everyone as it can be
 isolating

I think that, at the Foundation, we are blessed to have several
opportunities a year to meet with our colleagues during events, and that
things would be much more difficult as a distributed team if it weren't
the case.

-- Marc


___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wikimedia-l] [Wikimedia Announcements] This week on the Wikimedia Blog

2015-04-09 Thread Fabrice Florin
Hi folks,

Here are some of the stories featured this week on the Wikimedia Blog:

• Wikimedia Foundation releases latest transparency report
http://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/04/07/wikimedia-transparency-report/

• The new Content Translation tool is now used on 22 Wikipedias
http://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/04/08/the-new-content-translation-tool/

• How content translation improved my wiki edits
http://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/04/06/content-translation-improved-my-edits/

• Women and gender diversity on Wikimedia: our top stories
http://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/04/03/women-and-gender-top-stories/

• Inspire Campaign receives hundreds of new ideas to increase gender diversity 
on Wikimedia projects
http://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/04/03/inspire-campaign-new-ideas/

• Fighting corruption with Wikipedia: Johnson Oludeinde
http://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/04/08/fighting-corruption-johnson-oludeinde/

More stories on the Wikimedia Blog:
https://blog.wikimedia.org/

Best regards,


Fabrice


___

Fabrice Florin
Movement Communications Manager
Wikimedia Foundation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fabrice_Florin_(WMF)
___
Please note: all replies sent to this mailing list will be immediately directed 
to Wikimedia-l, the public mailing list of the Wikimedia community. For more 
information about Wikimedia-l:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
___
WikimediaAnnounce-l mailing list
wikimediaannounc...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaannounce-l
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] WMF office location and remodel

2015-04-09 Thread
On 9 April 2015 at 01:16, Garfield Byrd gb...@wikimedia.org wrote:
 ... The advantages of having good access to talented people and
 organizations WMF interacts with far outweigh any advantages to moving to a
 lower cost location outside of the San Francisco market area.

I find the world-view expressed here slightly odd to read, perhaps
because I am more European than American in background.

My background includes working for long periods with many companies in
the U.S. (such as Microsoft) and we managed to do that perfectly with
a handful of employees in a Seattle office, and most developers and
internal operations such as HR, finance etc. in Europe (very few of
these people ever had a need or desire to talk directly with customers
or partner organizations). It was easy enough for me to visit the U.S.
a couple of times a year when there was a lot going on there, and work
on a daily basis within a lively virtual team spread out in offices
across London, Paris and New York.

Talented people can be found in many places including San Francisco,
and though Google is incredibly important, there many other critically
important potential open knowledge partners without headquarters in SF
(Europeana springs to mind). Even Mozilla has a very nice office to
work with here in London. The idea that having all functions in SF has
advantages that far outweigh all other considerations seems to
over-egg the case, perhaps it would be a good thing to leave the door
open a crack for alternative ways of working to be possible in a far
future.

Fae

___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] My article on Wikipedia Zero and Net Neutrality, just out today at Reason.com

2015-04-09 Thread geni
On 9 April 2015 at 00:51, Mike Godwin mnemo...@gmail.com wrote:

 http://reason.com/archives/2015/04/08/nothing-but-net


 --Mike



I'm not convinced you are helping your case with your choice of venue.


-- 
geni
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wikimedia-l] Fwd: [Chapters] News from the Board of Wikimedia CH

2015-04-09 Thread Ilario Valdelli
FYI an official message from Wikimedia CH:


  Dear all,

Wikimedia CH held its annual General Assembly on 21 March. We're pleased to
announce that all of the Board re-candidated and were re-elected. We're
even more pleased to welcome a new, seventh Board member: Micha Rieser (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Micha).

Besides being an active administrator on the German Wikipedia, he has also
been our Wikipedian in Residence both at the Swiss Federal Archives and the
National Library. He's currently doing the job again at the Basel
University Library - this time without part-funding by WMCH. We trust that
his personal network among GLAMs will be an asset for us, and he's an
all-round great guy anyway (you can follow him on Twitter: @MLRzh)

People come, people go: Charles Andrès, our current Chief Scientific
Officer (in charge of projects and collaborations), has decided to move
back to France for family reasons. His last day in the Lausanne office will
be 30 June.

Charles has been around the French Wikipedia since 2007, joined our Board
in 2010, became our President and finally made the move to CSO. He has
given a lot of time and effort to the movement, and those who know him will
miss his relentless enthusiasm for new ideas and projects (you can still
check him out @chandreswp). The Board will consider the replacement
process, and after 30 June our Board members Stephane Coillet-Matillon and
Frédéric Schütz will handle the interim.

Best regards,

Patrick Kenel, President

Wikimedia CH - Association for the advancement of free knowledge
www.wikimedia.ch






-- 
Ilario Valdelli
Wikimedia CH
Verein zur Förderung Freien Wissens
Association pour l’avancement des connaissances libre
Associazione per il sostegno alla conoscenza libera
Switzerland - 8008 Zürich
Wikipedia: Ilario https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Ilario
http://www.wikimedia.ch
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe