Re: [Wikimedia-l] Welcoming Lucy Crompton-Reid as new CEO of Wikimedia UK

2015-07-14 Thread Tanweer Morshed
Congratulations Lucy! A warm welcome in the Wikimedia movement :)


Tanweer Morshed
Wikimedia Bangladesh

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 2:51 AM, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote:

 Thanks for this announcement, Michael.

 Lucy, welcome. I look forward to occasional collaborations with you  across
 the Atlantic.

 Regards,

 Pine
 Executive Director
 Cascadia Wikimedians User Group
 (Oregon, Washington State and British Columbia)
  On Jul 13, 2015 10:44 AM, Michael Maggs mich...@maggs.name wrote:

  Dear all
 
  I am very pleased to be able to announce today that Wikimedia UK has been
  been fortunate enough to secure as our new CEO Lucy Crompton-Reid,
  currently Director of the national live literature charity Apples and
  Snakes. Lucy brings extensive experience in volunteer engagement,
  organisational development, working with strategic partners, media,
  education, and securing external fundraising from trusts and foundations.
 
  Over the course of her career Lucy has worked in both the charitable and
  public sectors, including most recently Head of Outreach at the House of
  Lords where she was strategic and operational lead for education and
  outreach activities. Before that, she worked at Arts Council England,
  initially developing strategic partnerships before setting up a new area
  office with local government and schools partnerships. As Refugee Week
  National Co-ordinator for the British Refugee Council, Lucy chaired the
 UK
  steering group of NGOs and charities, led on media activities, and
  facilitated hundreds of volunteer cultural events each year. Lucy is
  passionate about education and learning and is deeply committed to
 ensuring
  open access to knowledge and information.
 
  Lucy will be joining us in early October. In the meantime, our interim
  CEO, D'Arcy Myers, will remain in post and will be working with Lucy to
  ensure a smooth handover.
 
  Please join me in offering Lucy a very warm welcome.
 
  Lucy says
 
  /I'm delighted to be joining Wikimedia UK this October as the charity's
  new Chief Executive, and look forward to working with the staff team,
 board
  and volunteer community -- as well as national and international partners
  -- to develop the work of the organisation. This is a significant time
 for
  Wikimedia and for the open knowledge sector more broadly, with the
  potential to create unparalleled access to educational content, coupled
  with threats to limit public access to information and knowledge. With
  nearly 18 years' experience in the arts, charitable and public sectors,
 I'm
  passionate about participation, and excited about the opportunity to
  facilitate greater public engagement with online content and information
  through Wikipedia and its sister projects, and other Wikimedia UK
  initiatives./
 
  
 
  Michael Maggs
 
  Chair, Wikimedia UK
 
 
  [The Wiki version of this announcement can be found here:
 
 https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/Engine_room#Welcoming_Lucy_Crompton-Reid_as_CEO
  ]
 
  ___
  Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
  https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
  Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
  Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
  mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
 ___
 Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
 https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
 Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
 mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe




-- 
Regards,
Tanweer Morshed
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Future of Wikipedia

2015-07-14 Thread Amy Vossbrinck
Hi Renata:

Please don't despair.  When I was growing up (I'm pushing 69) there were
definitely encyclopedias but they surely were not the *only research tools*.
Information was available, you just had to really dig for it - go to the
library, comb through the card catalogue, go into the stacks, find the
books, gather the information you needed, write it out by hand on paper
(there were no copiers), and note the source for the information on the set
of 3 x 5 index cards that you collected for the research project; or have
the research librarian retrieve the newspapers, or periodicals, or white
papers or mirco film and repeat what you did with the books; write it out
by hand on paper (again, no copiers), and note the source for the
information on the set of 3 x 5 index cards that you collected for the
research project.

Then you took all the information home, hand wrote the paper and once you
were happy with it, you typed it out on a manual typewriter, making sure
that you spaced it so that there would be enough room at the bottom for the
footnotes for each particular page.

If you had to make more than one copy, you put carbon paper in between the
sheets of paper and if you made a mistake, you carefully corrected every
page, making sure not to smudge the carbon or allow the papers and the
carbon to shift out of alignment.

If you needed more than 4 copies you typed the paper on a mimeograph
stencil.  If you made a mistake on the stencil, you used a mat knife and
carefully scraped the error off the back of the top sheet, cut a corner off
the stencil at the bottom and inserted that in the space between the top
sheet and the stencil back and typed the letter(s) again, making sure that
you did not accidentally let the top sheet or the stencil slip in the
typewriter roller, because if you did all of your alignment would be off
for the rest of the paper. There was a fluid to correct errors, but it
never worked very well. When the paper was done, you put the stencil on a
mimeograph machine and cranked it by hand until the stencil impression was
no longer deep enough to make copies.  If you needed more copies, you had
to cut another stencil by re-typing the entire paper.

I know this probably sounds like I had to hike 20 miles to school with
snow up to my waist - which I didn't -  but I offer it only to say that we
humans are a pretty persistent and creative bunch and when determined
enough we can make things work.  Sometimes, having to really dig for
something makes it all that much more precious.

Take care, Amy

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Renata St renataw...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi.

 So I saw this YouTube video yesterday about kids reacting to printed
 encyclopedia: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X7aJ3xaDMuMnoredirect=1

 It made me sad. And very fearful of the future of Wikipedia.

 These kids do not appreciate knowledge and information because they grew up
 with its abundance. When I was growing up (and I am only 30), printed
 encyclopedia was the only research tool. These kids will never know the
 frustration when you tried looking something up in those dusty volumes only
 to find minimal information (stub) or, worse yet, nothing on the topic.
 And the nagging feeling it left you with because your curiosity was not
 satisfied and you thirsted for more, but there was nothing else! And so
 when Wikipedia came around it was this wondrous thing where information was
 seemingly limitless and endless. And it was expanding at dizzying speeds.
 And you could add more! It was the answer to my childhood fantasy of having
 the limitless encyclopedia that answered every questions. And it filed my
 heart with joy and satisfaction not unlike the joy of a child in candy
 story (yes, I am a geek).

 Those kids never deprived of knowledge and information will never know how
 precious it is. They will not have the same love that is required to edit
 Wikipedia and write quality articles. And it makes me sad.

 Renata
 ___
 Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
 https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
 Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
 mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe




-- 
*Amy Vossbrinck*
*Executive Assistant to the*
*Chief of Finance and Administration, Garfield Byrd*
*Wikimedia Foundation*
*149 New Montgomery Street*
*San Francisco, CA 94105*
*415.839.6885  ext 6628*
*avossbri...@wikimedia.org avossbri...@wikimedia.org*
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Future of Wikipedia

2015-07-14 Thread Pete Forsyth
Thank you for sharing this, Renata -- cool video!

But I think I'm taking the exact opposite from it. It makes me happy. It
seems to me these kids love information -- and are eager to say so! -- and
love books, too, most of them expressed sadness at the idea of books
disappearing (but also, shock at the idea that an encyclopedia would cost
$1500).

I do think you have a good point, that the absence of Wikipedia in our
early lives provided big motivation for many of us to devote energy to
creating Wikipedia. I'm not sure that spells doom for Wikipedia, though --
rather, I'd say different kinds of motivation (more specific to one's
passions and interests, rather than a general desire to build a
comprehensive compendium) will fuel the next wave of Wikipedians.

People will probably value knowledge in different ways as it becomes more
abundant and less centralized, but I have a hard time believing they will
*cease* to value knowledge.

Pete
[[User:Peteforsyth]]

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Renata St renataw...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi.

 So I saw this YouTube video yesterday about kids reacting to printed
 encyclopedia: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X7aJ3xaDMuMnoredirect=1

 It made me sad. And very fearful of the future of Wikipedia.

 These kids do not appreciate knowledge and information because they grew up
 with its abundance. When I was growing up (and I am only 30), printed
 encyclopedia was the only research tool. These kids will never know the
 frustration when you tried looking something up in those dusty volumes only
 to find minimal information (stub) or, worse yet, nothing on the topic.
 And the nagging feeling it left you with because your curiosity was not
 satisfied and you thirsted for more, but there was nothing else! And so
 when Wikipedia came around it was this wondrous thing where information was
 seemingly limitless and endless. And it was expanding at dizzying speeds.
 And you could add more! It was the answer to my childhood fantasy of having
 the limitless encyclopedia that answered every questions. And it filed my
 heart with joy and satisfaction not unlike the joy of a child in candy
 story (yes, I am a geek).

 Those kids never deprived of knowledge and information will never know how
 precious it is. They will not have the same love that is required to edit
 Wikipedia and write quality articles. And it makes me sad.

 Renata
 ___
 Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
 https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
 Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
 mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Future of Wikipedia

2015-07-14 Thread geni
On 14 July 2015 at 21:22, Renata St renataw...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi.

 So I saw this YouTube video yesterday about kids reacting to printed
 encyclopedia: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X7aJ3xaDMuMnoredirect=1

 It made me sad. And very fearful of the future of Wikipedia.

 These kids do not appreciate knowledge and information because they grew up
 with its abundance. When I was growing up (and I am only 30), printed
 encyclopedia was the only research tool.



You would have been 8 years old when Encarta was launched.



 Those kids never deprived of knowledge and information will never know how
 precious it is.


Eh you always hit walls sooner or later. A lot of information is still
buried in libraries (the best soruce I'm aware of for theThe jewelry of
roman Britain is a book written in 1996). Other stuff is behind paywalls or
is commercially sensitive. Or simply doesn't exist (there doesn't seem to
be a solid history of calshot castle anywhere).



 They will not have the same love that is required to edit
 Wikipedia and write quality articles. And it makes me sad.


I think there will be other motivations.


-- 
geni
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Find Community Engagement sessions at Wikimania 2015!

2015-07-14 Thread Maria Cruz
Hi all,
a few more sessions that were missed in the last email:

*Wednesday (hackathon):*
* *Education Program Extension Hackathon.*
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T103623* Workplace 2, Don Genaro, 1 pm.
Hosted by Sage Ross.*

*Friday*
* Pitfalls, protocols and prior planning: A panel on making the most of
Education Program.
https://wikimania2015.wikimedia.org/wiki/Submissions/Pitfalls,_Protocols_and_Prior_Planning:_a_Panel_on_Making_the_Most_of_the_Education_Program*
16:30 - 17 hs. Panel hosted by Anna Koval. *This session will help
Wikimedians, educators, those who are already running Wikipedia Education
Programs, and those who are already using the Wikimedia projects in
educational settings, as well as those who are curious about it. This
session will present successful models, pitfalls, and protocols that will
help everyone make the most of their education program.

*Saturday*
* *Communicating your projects: Wikipedia Education program as an example.
https://wikimania2015.wikimedia.org/wiki/Submissions/Communicating_your_projects_-_Wikipedia_Education_Program_as_an_example
16 - 16:30 hs. Tutorial hosted by Samir Elsharbaty.* Many wikimedians come
to great ideas, plan and implement them in a great way but no one else
hears about, other than those involved in the activity. This tutorial will
try to cover how event organizers can reach out to bigger (and the right)
audience, among other things.


Cheers!



*María Cruz * \\   Communications and Outreach Coordinator, LE Team
\\ Wikimedia
Foundation, Inc.
mc...@wikimedia.org  |  :  @marianarra_ https://twitter.com/marianarra_

On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Maria Cruz mc...@wikimedia.org wrote:

 Hi all!
 As Wikimanía México is just around the corner, I wanted to share with you
 all an overview of sessions hosted by Community Engagement department at
 WMF.

 There are hacks, workshops, panels, presentations and discussions covering
 a range of topics! We will be happy to have you join us in them =)

 I hope this breakdown is clear and not too confusing.

 *Thursday (Hackathon)*
 * *Visual Editor Translathon.
 https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T91108 16 hs, Workplace 1 (Don
 Américo). Hosted by Erica Litrenta and Benoît Evellin. *

 *Friday*
 * *Engaging Wikipedia's Natural Ally: How to unlock and amplify the
 access, knowledge, skills and resources of University and Research
 Libraries.
 https://wikimania2015.wikimedia.org/wiki/Submissions/Engaging_Wikipedia%27s_Natural_Ally:_How_to_unlock_and_amplify_the_access,_knowledge,_skills_and_resources_of_University_and_Research_Libraries
  11:30
 - 12 hs. Presentation and discussion hosted by Alex Stinson.* The
 presentation will focus on experimental Wikipedia Library programs and
 tools growing out of these conversations that are focused on university and
 other research libraries. The discussion will seek to answer: How effective
 are our reference materials for our readers? Can readers really leverage
 higher quality scholarly references to help further their research?

 * *It's (Not) all about the money: The Funds Dissemination Committee
 Unveiled.
 https://wikimania2015.wikimedia.org/wiki/Submissions/Funding_the_movement%27s_dreams:_How_FDC_works_and_help_build_strong_organizations
 17 - 17:30 hs. Presentation with panel, hosted by Matanya Moses (FDC
 member)  Katy Love (FDC staff member)  Dariusz Jemielniak (FDC member). * 
 Come
 meet this unique group of community members, understand their process and
 learn about how they make decisions. Hear their reflections on the past
 year overseeing the Annual Plan Grants.

 *Saturday*
 * *Engaging with Community Engagement.
 https://wikimania2015.wikimedia.org/wiki/Submissions/Engaging_with_Community_Engagement
 9 - 10 hs. Panel hosted by Luis Villa.* Come meet some of the key members
 of this new team and ask them questions about the new group and where it is
 headed.

 * *IdeLab workshop: Making ideas into action.
 https://wikimania2015.wikimedia.org/wiki/Submissions/IdeaLab_Workshop:_Making_Ideas_into_Action11
 - 12:30 hs. Workshop hosted by Siko Bouterse, Jonathan Morgan and Marti
 Johnson. * Have an idea for a project to improve Wikimedia? Want feedback
 or help obtaining funding to turn your idea into action? Bring your ideas
 and  and let’s turn ideas into actionable projects together!

 * *GLAM Learning Circle.
 https://wikimania2015.wikimedia.org/wiki/Submissions/GLAM_Learning_Circle
 14 - 15:30 hs. Panel Hosted by Jaime Anstee and María Cruz.* A follow-up
 to learning circles facilitated at GLAM Wiki Conference in the Hague and
 next step in the learning journey to capture best practices and lessons
 learned in GLAM-wiki partnering.

 * *Free as in Free: Strategies for advancing open access on Wikipedia.
 https://wikimania2015.wikimedia.org/wiki/Submissions/Free_as_in_Free:_Strategies_for_Advancing_Open_Access_on_Wikipedia
 15 - 15:30 hs. Panel presentation and discussion hosted by Nick Shockey and
 Jake Orlowitz.* Highlighted topics include: 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Future of Wikipedia

2015-07-14 Thread Renata St

 I know this probably sounds like I had to hike 20 miles to school with
 snow up to my waist - which I didn't -  but I offer it only to say that we
 humans are a pretty persistent and creative bunch and when determined
 enough we can make things work.  Sometimes, having to really dig for
 something makes it all that much more precious.


That is my point exactly. The kids these days don't struggle like that -
type in google, hit enter, and boom! No digging required. Served on a
silver platter. And you don't develop appreciation for something you don't
struggle for.

No struggle = no appreciation = no labor of love creating it for others.
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Future of Wikipedia

2015-07-14 Thread Renata St

  These kids do not appreciate knowledge and information because they grew
 up
  with its abundance. When I was growing up (and I am only 30), printed
  encyclopedia was the only research tool.

 You would have been 8 years old when Encarta was launched.


I am from a small non-English speaking country. There was lack of even
general books on topics because on how small the population (3.5 million).
I remember I had to do a long research paper on India (history, geography,
culture, religion, etc.). You would think easy - India is a big,
interesting country. Surely there must be books on it. Not so much...
Unless you wanted to read someone's travel impressions from 30 years ago
for 300 pages. Finding the info was the biggest struggle. And so we had
this 12-volume encyclopedia. And it was was like the crown jewel of our
possessions. My mom forbade me to mark anything (even with a pencil) at all
on the pages.


 Those kids never deprived of knowledge and information will never know how
  precious it is.

 Eh you always hit walls sooner or later. A lot of information is still
 buried in libraries (the best soruce I'm aware of for theThe jewelry of
 roman Britain is a book written in 1996). Other stuff is behind paywalls or
 is commercially sensitive. Or simply doesn't exist (there doesn't seem to
 be a solid history of calshot castle anywhere).


You are talking about niche, specialized topics graduate students might
care. Yes, there is still a lot of info locked in the dead-tree world, but
anything that an average high school kid might need is in overabundance on
the Internet (Wikipedia included). In fact, I am becoming convinced that
for this new generation filtering the info from the flood out there will be
a lot more valuable skill than finding info.
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Future of Wikipedia

2015-07-14 Thread Pine W
I agree that finding correct, accurate, current, and NPOV information can
be a challenging task, and media literacy is an important skill these days.
Good research tasks today go beyond the goal of finding just any book,
magazine, journal or webpage that asserts a certain fact.

Pine
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Future of Wikipedia

2015-07-14 Thread Keegan Peterzell
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Pete Forsyth petefors...@gmail.com wrote:

 Thank you for sharing this, Renata -- cool video!

 But I think I'm taking the exact opposite from it. It makes me happy. It
 seems to me these kids love information -- and are eager to say so! -- and
 love books, too, most of them expressed sadness at the idea of books
 disappearing (but also, shock at the idea that an encyclopedia would cost
 $1500).

 I do think you have a good point, that the absence of Wikipedia in our
 early lives provided big motivation for many of us to devote energy to
 creating Wikipedia. I'm not sure that spells doom for Wikipedia, though --
 rather, I'd say different kinds of motivation (more specific to one's
 passions and interests, rather than a general desire to build a
 comprehensive compendium) will fuel the next wave of Wikipedians.

 People will probably value knowledge in different ways as it becomes more
 abundant and less centralized, but I have a hard time believing they will
 *cease* to value knowledge.

 Pete
 [[User:Peteforsyth]]


​+1​


-- 
~Keegan

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Keegan

This is my personal email address. Everything sent from this email address
is in a personal capacity.
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe