Re: [Wikimedia-l] Does Foundation have 3rd party standing against Harald Bischoff?

2015-07-29 Thread Lilburne
On 29/07/2015 09:01, Petr Kadlec wrote: Really? Neither the word instititution nor third party [website] appear in the text of the CC license, so on what exactly do you base this very specific distinction just so narrowly fitting our behavior (no image attribution within articles, only on the

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Does Foundation have 3rd party standing against Harald Bischoff?

2015-07-29 Thread James Salsman
... The license requires only that the credit be implemented in any reasonable manner. [Also note that the _text_ of our projects, while also licensed under CC-BY-SA, is licensed in way that explicitly states that a sufficient attribution is [t]hrough hyperlink (where possible) or URL to the

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Does Foundation have 3rd party standing against Harald Bischoff?

2015-07-29 Thread Petr Kadlec
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Martin Kraft wikipe...@martinkraft.com wrote: Am 26.07.2015 um 19:29 schrieb James Salsman: If Harald Bischoff has defrauded Commons reusers by requiring stricter attribution than the community requires, does the Foundation have standing in Germany to

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Does Foundation have 3rd party standing against Harald Bischoff?

2015-07-29 Thread Martin Kraft
Really? Neither the word instititution nor third party [website] appear in the text of the CC license, so on what exactly do you base this very specific distinction just so narrowly fitting our behavior (no image attribution within articles, only on the image description page reachable upon