Re: [Wikimedia-l] Advertising in Central notice?

Why not using a existing survey tool like limesurvey? I am wondering if we need all this surveys... > From: p858sn...@gmail.com > Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 19:31:43 +1000 > To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Advertising in Central notice? > > E:QuickSurvey is currently

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Superprotect is gone

On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Neil Harris wrote: > That's fantastic, represents a huge vote of confidence for the Wiki Way, > and is a big move towards improving the relationship between the WMF and > the community. > Just to keep things in perspective: the removal of

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Advertising in Central notice?

E:QuickSurvey is currently under development by the WMF for this. On 8 November 2015 at 18:52, Steinsplitter Wiki wrote: > Some thoughts: > Pete, Thanks for bringing this up here and taking action on meta. I was > concerned seeing the link to a commercial company

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Superprotect is gone

On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 8:04 AM, pi zero wrote: > In > other words, it wasn't removed because it shouldn't have been imposed in > the first place, but merely because it wasn't used. Is it good that it was > removed? Sure, it's better to have had it removed than not. But

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Superprotect is gone

Hi pi zero, On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 2:04 PM, pi zero wrote: > it wasn't removed because it shouldn't have been imposed in > the first place, but merely because it wasn't used. I'm sorry if my wording could suggest this interpretation. I just wanted to provide basic

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Superprotect is gone

On Nov 8, 2015 9:34 PM, "Quim Gil" wrote: > the Q included more details: > > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/WMF_product_development_process/2015-11-05#When_has_been_Superprotect_used.3F > > The main reason to act upon Superprotect now is the updated product > development

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Superprotect is gone

Hi Andy, On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 12:04 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote: > Referring to "misbehaviour" in this context is extremely offensive; the > initial use of superprotect was not a response to "misbehaviour". > Changed for the more precise and descriptive term "irregular

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Superprotect is gone

Thanks for the explanations. I always thought of the Superprotect function as a technical way to react in a social-legal space of tension. A discussion about the technical function is much less interesting than about the real issue, of how to improve the MediaWiki software with regard to the

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Advertising in Central notice?

Ziko, I agree. But we are using Qualtrics since 2011, and we never had a link to their website in such way. What has changed? *Regards,Itzik Edri* Chairperson, Wikimedia Israel +972-(0)-54-5878078 | http://www.wikimedia.org.il Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share