Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Affiliates] Changes to current chapter and thematic organisation criteria

> What harm is avoided by eliminating the ambiguity you refer to, Pine? One of the harms is that aspiring chapters don't know what standards we should be aiming to meet, because the standards are vague. Another harm is that the Affiliations Committee doesn't have clear criteria to apply, which

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Affiliates] Changes to current chapter and thematic organisation criteria

On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Pine W wrote: > Hi Carlos, > > As I mentioned previously, I would suggest that the criteria should also > apply to existing chapters. If any chapter's status is in doubt as a result > of the new criteria, then the chapter can be given 6

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Affiliates] Changes to current chapter and thematic organisation criteria

Hello Lane, The proposed criteria will apply to new organizations. However, we should all help all affiliates to operate at higher standards, and we're willing and happy to assist with anything affiliates need to grow :-) El 19/08/2016 a las 05:51 p.m., Lane Rasberry escribió: Hello, Do

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Affiliates] Changes to current chapter and thematic organisation criteria

Hello Pine, El 19/08/2016 a las 06:28 p.m., Pine W escribió: Hi Carlos, In general, I like the new criteria. I would like to suggest making the criteria entirely quantitative, so that there is minimal subjectivity about whether or not affiliates are meeting these standards and therefore

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Affiliates] Changes to current chapter and thematic organisation criteria

Just one small point, "and to conduct programs and events at least once every two months" reads like a rule set by Americans who deliberately or otherwise don't want too much emphasis on the education program. Most western countries have remuneration packages that put more emphasis on holiday

Re: [Wikimedia-l] FW: My final email

Hi Caitlin, I know you've already answered Peter's original question, but are you able to answer John's question as well? Cheers, Craig Franklin On 17 August 2016 at 19:31, John Mark Vandenberg wrote: > What is https://www.pages04.net/ ? > > WMF has given them a copy of (a