On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Pine W wrote:
> Hi Anna,
>
> >> * How much is this timeline extension projected to cost, and from what
> >> source are the funds being drawn? (Note that this doesn't assume that
> the
> >> decision was a bad one, but I very much want to know
Hi Anna,
>> * How much is this timeline extension projected to cost, and from what
>> source are the funds being drawn? (Note that this doesn't assume that the
>> decision was a bad one, but I very much want to know the source of the
>> funds and how much is likely to be drawn from it.)
>
>
Thanks for the updates.
My perspective is that a functioning advisory board could be nice to have,
and I hope that its scope and methods of work could be articulated
somewhere such as in a charter. I think that such an arrangement would help
everyone to know their roles and have realistic
Hello! Please find my answers inline.
>> What is the status of the Avisory Board?
There is no active Advisory Board at the moment, but the Board has approved
inviting new members for the year. I have added a template to the page on
Wikimedia Foundation site about it not being accurate at the
Hi,
the Advisory Board, as it was, and so far I can see, as it probably will
be, does not have something like a structure or a channel. It is more
like a bunch of individuals that mostly the board, and in some cases the
WMF staff may (or mostly) may not approach on specific topics. The board
That was meant to be sent to Anna offlist. Sorry for sending here. Please
ignore this message.
Samir Elsharbaty
Communications|Wikimedia Foundation
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Samir Elsharbaty wrote:
> Hey Anna,
>
> I hope that everything is going well at your
Hey Anna,
I hope that everything is going well at your end.
I think this contest is doing REALLY well and was wondering if you would
like us to feature it on the Wikimedia blog. If you are interested, I can
start drafting something after getting some information/quotes from you
and/or other lead
I believe that the AB should have something to propose and say there, so
until it is I am not going to put any proposals forward in this respect.
Best
On Jun 27, 2017 4:39 PM, "Rogol Domedonfors" wrote:
> Are those channels proposed as part of the paper you brought to
Are those channels proposed as part of the paper you brought to the BGC on
the 13th April, then? Or are you ready to discuss them now? Or will the
possibility of establishing them be postponed until some time after the
Advisory Board is reconstituted?
"Rogol"
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 11:14 AM,
On 27 June 2017 at 04:33, Anna Stillwell wrote:
...
>> * How much is this timeline extension projected to cost, and from what
>> source are the funds being drawn? (Note that this doesn't assume that the
>> decision was a bad one, but I very much want to know the source
I think we should have those channels, once the body is constituted.
Best
Dj
On Jun 26, 2017 19:59, "Rogol Domedonfors" wrote:
> Dariusz
>
> Thanks for that update. You don't mention any channels for communication
> between the reconstituted Board and the Community at
[x-posted announcement]
Hello,
This is a reminder that the Wikimedia Language team's office hour is
happening later today (details at the end).
Please note, our agenda has been updated and today we will have a guest
speaker from the Tamil Wikipedia - Ravishankar A
Hoi,
Anna I have one question for you. You say that "you would not frame the
challenge as I do". How would you characterise the inherent diversity issue
of the WMF that is centred around how it spends its money and where its
attention goes?
Thanks,
GerardM
On 26 June 2017 at 01:57, Anna
13 matches
Mail list logo