Re: [Wikimedia-l] How can we fix the two-stage page loading problem?

2017-09-11 Thread Dennis During
Can we get back on topic please? I isn't there another thread for beating the fundraising-disclosure-oversight dead horse? ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Banners for logged-in users (was:How can we fix the two-stage page loading problem?)

2017-09-11 Thread David Emrany
Hi lodewijk I've altered the subject line at your suggestion. The name of the case (and the opposite party) is equally well known to Wikimedia-Legal. The first decision in the case is online at the WIPO website, however, since it is still under litigation, I am not linking to it under the

Re: [Wikimedia-l] How can we fix the two-stage page loading problem?

2017-09-11 Thread David Emrany
Dear Joseph Thanks for that link. *NB*: I hope that the list moderators shall not censor / block / unduly delay this important internal conversation we are having concerning WMF self-financing model. Since this concerns the WMF fund-raising drives of Nov-Dec 2016, I'm linking to the following

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Affiliates] Chapter De-Recognition: Wikimedia Macedonia

2017-09-11 Thread Kirill Lokshin
Hi Mārtiņš, That's correct; this is in reference to the original Wikimedia Macedonia. Regards, Kirill Lokshin Chair, Affiliations Committee On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Mārtiņš Bruņenieks wrote: > Hi! > I assume this is the original Wikimedia Macedonia Chapter and not

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Banners for logged-in users (was:How can we fix the two-stage page loading problem?)

2017-09-11 Thread Lodewijk
hi david, i'll respond inline. On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:08 AM, David Emrany wrote: > Hi lodewijk > > I've altered the subject line at your suggestion. > thank you. > > The name of the case (and the opposite party) is equally well known to > Wikimedia-Legal. The

Re: [Wikimedia-l] How can we fix the two-stage page loading problem?

2017-09-11 Thread Lodewijk
hi david, as with your accusations regarding the spending, my question would be whether you have anything to substantiate it. Seddon was clear: it did not happen, unless perhaps a human error in a minimal number of campaigns. If you have that then please bring that up in a *separate* thead.