Can we get back on topic please? I isn't there another thread for beating
the fundraising-disclosure-oversight dead horse?
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
I've altered the subject line at your suggestion.
The name of the case (and the opposite party) is equally well known to
Wikimedia-Legal. The first decision in the case is online at the WIPO
website, however, since it is still under litigation, I am not linking
to it under the
Thanks for that link.
*NB*: I hope that the list moderators shall not censor / block / unduly
delay this important internal conversation we are having concerning WMF
Since this concerns the WMF fund-raising drives of Nov-Dec 2016, I'm
linking to the following
That's correct; this is in reference to the original Wikimedia Macedonia.
Chair, Affiliations Committee
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Mārtiņš Bruņenieks
> I assume this is the original Wikimedia Macedonia Chapter and not
i'll respond inline.
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:08 AM, David Emrany
> Hi lodewijk
> I've altered the subject line at your suggestion.
> The name of the case (and the opposite party) is equally well known to
> Wikimedia-Legal. The
as with your accusations regarding the spending, my question would be whether
you have anything to substantiate it. Seddon was clear: it did not happen,
unless perhaps a human error in a minimal number of campaigns. If you have
that then please bring that up in a *separate* thead.