Let me just suggest, again, that we should find out how much it would
cost to avoid the most widely "baked in" vulnerabilities which are
known to state and non-state actor. I can't imagine why that wouldn't
be worth it. If the NSA wants private Foundation data, they could send
a National Security Letter, ordinary subpoena, or bribe Zimbabwean
police to send a subpoena from their Interpol FAX.


On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 12:45 AM, Craig Franklin
<cfrank...@halonetwork.net> wrote:
> I think, as Geni says, that even that isn't going to provide any effective
> barrier.  If the NSA or other US Government spooks want to get into the
> servers, they will, regardless of what hardware it's running on, what
> software it uses, or what jurisdiction it is located in.  Anything that the
> Foundation does to "protect" itself is just going to be security theatre.
> Anyone doing anything that the current or future American administrations
> might object to should keep that in mind.  I assume that every place I go
> on the Internet is already compromised and act accordingly.
>
> Cheers,
> Craig
>
> On 21 January 2018 at 19:13, Yaroslav Blanter <ymb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> What about moving to another country? Still not an option?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Yaroslav
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 8:38 AM, Lodewijk <lodew...@effeietsanders.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > 1) still don't see the relevance. If better technology is needed, it's
>> > needed - that should be independent of any lobbying preferences. It looks
>> > like you're just pushing tangents again.
>> >
>> > 2) You do realize that the FTC and the FEC are very different
>> > organizations? But again, it seems you just used this statement as an
>> > opportunity to push a tangent.
>> >
>> > Please don't do that.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Lodewijk
>> >
>> > On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 2:43 PM, James Salsman <jsals...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > > 1) I don't quite see how your question about servers and switches
>> > relates
>> > > > to Stephen's statement. Could you explain for us mere mortals how you
>> > > link
>> > > > the two?
>> > >
>> > > The NSA surveillance which was reauthorized by Congress can not depend
>> > > on eavesdropping alone with new HTTPS cyphers. It needs compromised
>> > > hardware to work, such as has been included in Dell servers since the
>> > > Foundation started purchasing them, and the design of which was
>> > > overseen by the Foundation's CTO, who worked then at Intel. This
>> > > provides us with the know-how, a teachable moment, and an excellent
>> > > opportunity to specify and acquire replacement open source hardware
>> > > which doesn't have the DIETYBOUNCE / System Management Mode OOB / iAMT
>> > > and related backdoors.
>> > >
>> > > https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2014/01/nsa_exploit_of.html
>> > >
>> > > > 2) I somehow missed the commitment by the WMF to research "FEC
>> > > requirements
>> > > > of organized advocates for US political candidates' or anything that
>> > > > suggests that the WMF may advocate for specific political candidates
>> > > (which
>> > > > seems a change of course that would be hard to sweep under the rug).
>> > > Could
>> > > > you quote?
>> > >
>> > > https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_
>> > > talk:Conflict_of_interest&diff=prev&oldid=815460492#
>> > > Note_from_Wikimedia_Legal
>> > >
>> > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Slaporte_(WMF)#
>> > > Research_topic_request
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/
>> > > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/
>> > > wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>> > >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/
>> > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/
>> > wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/
>> wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/
>> wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to