i think many people might not understand what is the real problem here with
this aspect in the general framework. I might make a brutal simplification, of
course.
In any case, if you manage to make the moment when a logged-in user is
connected to a platform for the first time a secret, that
Fine! If people refuse the easy way out, then create an Rfc, and start the
process to make creation of new user accounts non-public information.
Den fre. 26. jan. 2018, 03.04 skrev Alessandro Marchetti via Wikimedia-l <
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org>:
> you are not "exposing the user
you are not "exposing the user unknowingly visiting the site" with the bot
itself...when you visit the site you are integrated in the SUL, it's public
information since ages. The fact that a bot takes care of it or a human being
leaves a message does not tell you a lot more. Sometimes on
I can't see that T42006 is relevant in this case. It is about abusive use
of a bot, not about creation of the central account in itself.
The existence of a central account leads to creation of the local account.
This is probably acceptable. Then this may lead to the abusiv behavior, ie
exposing
The information is so noisy (transclusions may trigger autocreation) and
irrelevant (no information about pages, just wikis) I don't see an issue
worth resolving.
Vito
2018-01-25 22:54 GMT+01:00 Pine W :
> Joe,
>
> I believe that the issue of a potential privacy violation
Joe,
I believe that the issue of a potential privacy violation was first raised
on this list on December 30th, and I first emailed WMF Legal about this
issue on January 1st. Keeping in mind that the issue involves potential
privacy violations, I think that it's reasonable to think that this issue
Congratulations to everyone who has been appointed.
Sam.
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to:
Congratulations to all appointees!
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 8:17 PM, Sam Oyeyele wrote:
> Congratulations to everyone who has been appointed.
>
> Sam.
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/
>
Congratulations to everyone who has been appointed.
Sam.
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to:
Congratulations to all!
Hasive
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 8:27 PM, Katherine Maher
wrote:
> Congratulations to Sami, Derick, and Biplab on your new appointments, Emna
> and Maor on your reappointments, and thank you Galileo for your many years
> of service!
>
> On Wed, Jan
I will only answer for our discussions during the board meeting.
This goes two fold:
* we have many teams, including in tech and product, that are understaffed.
Without pointing at one specifically, I raised that at work I have team I
can compare to the Foundation's one, on the very same topic,
Many thanks, Tillman, for your reply and also Christophes. Your
analysis shows there are factors effecting pageviews that needs a
qualified analysis to get to understand the numbers .
I am also happy to see that there are clever people looking into this,
and I was also very glad to see, in
12 matches
Mail list logo