No.
OCW uses CC-NC-SA 4.0; Wikimedia uses CC-SA 3.0.
Denny is asking where we are in upgrading to CC-SA 4.0, which is a very
good question. :)
That will provide all of the same modes of reuse as the 3.0 license, but is
more cleanly compatible with other 4.0 licenses, particularly around edge
Hoi,
Thank you for the overly broad misrepresentation. As always, copyright is
predatory. As we can prove that copyright is the enemy of science and
knowledge we should not be upset that *copyright *is abused we should
welcome it as it proves the point. Also when we use texts from everywhere
and
> Now compiling a repository of such orally transmitted histories and
> traditions would be an amazing idea for a new project in my opinion.
I would suggest that we already have a repository built for purpose to
gather these oral histories and it's Wikimedia Commons. I definitely agree
that
I think this CC-4 licensing would allow for 1) sharing, 2) adapting, but 3)
non-commercially. At least this is what I learned when I was in
communication a number of times with the MIT associate *dean* of
digital *learning
Cecilia d'Oliveira *at the time about sharing CC-4 licensed MIT
