Of course, there is more than one way to skin a potato, but it doesn't mean
that those ways are useful, desirable, or informative. You say that readers
are more likely to access people who are named, than people who are
notable, but isn't that relevant? If notable people are not named, then we
can
The Wikimedia Foundation security team is implementing a new password
policy and requirements. [0] You can learn more about the project on
MediaWiki.org. [1]
These new requirements will apply to new accounts and privileged
accounts. New accounts will be required to create a password with a
I love the focus on mobile and smaller format interfaces, quite generally;
it's increasingly how I use the projects too!
A) This banner-text-series is clearly impactful, gave me a bit of a jump
scare, and got me to read it to find out why. I'm still not sure how I feel
about it.
~ Visual effect:
Hi Tomasz,
whereas you are right in theory, a practical application of this method
requires (i) availability and acceptance of all these sources in the
community (for example, if one side published in Croatian and another one
published in English, Croatian Wikipedia is likely to use only sources
Vast majority of sources in controversial topics are usually biased. There
are topics where there is in fact no any non-biased sources. And - coming
back to my previous example, having knowledge how automatic method o bias
measurement works it is very easy to bully it:
"According to unfaithful
