[Wikimedia-l] WikiNusantara

2019-05-07 Thread Biyanto Rebin
Hello all,

We just held our first national conference in Indonesia with 82
participants for the closed session and 100 selected participants for the
open session.[1] Our theme for the conference was "a window of
collaboration".

Please visit our blog:
https://wikimedia.or.id/2019/05/08/wikinusantara-the-first-nationwide-conference-for-the-indonesian-wikimedia-community-successfully-took-place/

And full documentation is in here:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:WikiNusantara_2019

[1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiNusantara_2019

-- 
Biyanto Rebin | Ketua Umum (*Chair*) 2016-2018
Wikimedia Indonesia
Surel: biyanto.re...@wikimedia.or.id
-
Dukung upaya kami membebaskan pengetahuan:
https://wikimedia.or.id/sumbangan/

___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 


Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimedia Education] W Greenhouse - final week for applications, video guide and "Hit Submit!" virtual sessions!

2019-05-07 Thread Paulo Santos Perneta
Sorry for the duplicate, this forward was meant to our general list at
Wikimedia Portugal, not here :\.

Paulo Santos Perneta  escreveu no dia terça,
7/05/2019 à(s) 23:35:

>
>
> -- Forwarded message -
> De: Melissa Guadalupe Huertas 
> Date: terça, 7/05/2019 à(s) 22:36
> Subject: [Wikimedia Education] W Greenhouse - final week for
> applications, video guide and "Hit Submit!" virtual sessions!
> To: , ,
> Wikipedia & Education User Group 
>
>
> Hola Wikimedia and education community!
>
> We are in the final week of applications to the Wikimedia & Education
> Greenhouse, time has really flown by! We have heard many of you have a
> great idea for a team application but are a little worried about the
> requirements for completing the application form or about the time needed.
> Don't you worry!
>
> We have created a step-by-step video guide showing you how a team could go
> about completing the application form using an imaginary (but very
> realistic) example. It takes less than an hour
> <
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Y_c-ejRh9cKgU31WO2nw4ZZ2xukVtfVk/view?usp=sharing
> >!
> You can watch the video along while completing your team application for
> extra tips, explanations, and clear examples. We hope you find it helpful!
>
> Additionally, we will be hosting two "Hit Submit!" virtual sessions to
> support you through the process of completing a team application form. The
> goal of these virtual events is that by the end of the session you will be
> able to submit a complete team application! Join us in the following times
> and dates:
>
> - Thursday May 9, 13:00 - 15:00 UTC (link to join
> )
> - Saturday May 11, 15:00 - 17:00 UTC (link to join
> )
>
> Before saying goodbye I'd also like to answer one common question we have
> received: What happens after the team applications close on May 12? Well,
> from May 13 - 19 we are giving the community the opportunity to provide
> feedback to the team applications. This means teams will have one extra
> week to make improvements to their proposals before the selection committee
> starts their review process.
>
> We hope this encourages you to submit a team application soon! Don't forget
> that if you need any extra support we are only a message away.
>
> Cheers!
>
> -Melissa
>
>
> --
> *Melissa Guadalupe Huertas*
> Wikimedia Foundation | Education Program Officer
> mguadal...@wikimedia.org
> user: MGuadalupe (WMF)
> Check out our newsletter: This Month in Education
> 
> ___
> Education mailing list
> educat...@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education
>
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 


[Wikimedia-l] Fwd: [Wikimedia Education] W Greenhouse - final week for applications, video guide and "Hit Submit!" virtual sessions!

2019-05-07 Thread Paulo Santos Perneta
-- Forwarded message -
De: Melissa Guadalupe Huertas 
Date: terça, 7/05/2019 à(s) 22:36
Subject: [Wikimedia Education] W Greenhouse - final week for
applications, video guide and "Hit Submit!" virtual sessions!
To: , ,
Wikipedia & Education User Group 


Hola Wikimedia and education community!

We are in the final week of applications to the Wikimedia & Education
Greenhouse, time has really flown by! We have heard many of you have a
great idea for a team application but are a little worried about the
requirements for completing the application form or about the time needed.
Don't you worry!

We have created a step-by-step video guide showing you how a team could go
about completing the application form using an imaginary (but very
realistic) example. It takes less than an hour
<
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Y_c-ejRh9cKgU31WO2nw4ZZ2xukVtfVk/view?usp=sharing
>!
You can watch the video along while completing your team application for
extra tips, explanations, and clear examples. We hope you find it helpful!

Additionally, we will be hosting two "Hit Submit!" virtual sessions to
support you through the process of completing a team application form. The
goal of these virtual events is that by the end of the session you will be
able to submit a complete team application! Join us in the following times
and dates:

- Thursday May 9, 13:00 - 15:00 UTC (link to join
)
- Saturday May 11, 15:00 - 17:00 UTC (link to join
)

Before saying goodbye I'd also like to answer one common question we have
received: What happens after the team applications close on May 12? Well,
from May 13 - 19 we are giving the community the opportunity to provide
feedback to the team applications. This means teams will have one extra
week to make improvements to their proposals before the selection committee
starts their review process.

We hope this encourages you to submit a team application soon! Don't forget
that if you need any extra support we are only a message away.

Cheers!

-Melissa


-- 
*Melissa Guadalupe Huertas*
Wikimedia Foundation | Education Program Officer
mguadal...@wikimedia.org
user: MGuadalupe (WMF)
Check out our newsletter: This Month in Education

___
Education mailing list
educat...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 


[Wikimedia-l] Congratulations to all interns selected for Google Summer of Code 2019 & Outreachy Round 18!!!

2019-05-07 Thread Srishti Sethi
Hello everyone,

Please join me in welcoming 16 projects that we have accepted through
Google Summer of Code 2019 and Outreachy Round 18 :) We received around 100
applications for 18 projects we promoted during the application period
through both programs, including two projects that were proposed by
interns. See below for more information on the accepted projects:

*Google Summer of Code 2019*

*Name, Project  - Mentor(s)*
1. Aditya Jain, Create a subpage for statistics and charts related to a
hashtag search  - Sam Walton

2. Amit Joki, Add Multi-wiki support to WikiEduDashboard <
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T220573> - Sage Ross, Wes Reid

3. Ankita Mandal, Improve the interface of Special:ViewData in the Cargo
extension  - Yaron Koren

4. Jay Prakash, Develop code samples in PHP & Javascript to demonstrate the
use of MediaWiki Action API modules <
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T219193> - Srishti Sethi, Sarah Rodlund

5. Muhammad Usman, Improve article recommendation pipeline <
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T218971> - Bahodir Mansurov

6. Priyanshu Varshney, Add an editable calendar interface to Page Forms
extension  - Yaron Koren, Erik
Biegert

7. Rammanoj Potla, Develop a tool for event organizers to track developer
activity  - Suchakra Sharma,
Srishti Sethi

8. Shivansh Bindal, Make notification counts update without page reload <
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T220324> - Kosta Harlan, Roan Kattouw

9. Ton Creus Costa, Integrate SVG translate with content translation <
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T220440> - Petar Petkovic, Sam Wilson

10. Ujjwal Agarwal, Create an Android app that acts as an alternative
frontend for the WikiEducation Dashboard <
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T217202> - Sage Ross

11. Vanshika Arora, Add Structured Commons support to Commons Android app <
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T220198> - Nicolas Raoul, Ashish Kumar

12. Vasanth Gopa, Develop a tool to cut video in Wikimedia Commons <
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T220228> - James Heilman, Pratik Shetty,
Hassan Amin

*Outreachy Round 18*

*Name, Project  - Mentor(s)*
13. Doris Zhou, Better understand impact of content translation tools <
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T217699> - Isaac Johnson

14. Jerop Brenda, Documentation improvements to the ~20 top ~70 most viewed
MediaWiki Action API pages on-wiki <
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T218046> - Srishti Sethi, Sarah Rodlund

15. Khyati Soneji, Improve Programs & Events Dashboard for use in the
#1lib1ref campaign  - Sage Ross

16. Silky Priya, Add leaderboard based on user’s edits using Commons
Android app  - Vivek Maskara,
Ujjwal Agarwal

You can stay up to date on the progress of selected projects by keeping an
eye on:
* https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/2019
* https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Outreachy/Round_18

We wish all interns have a wonderful summer working on projects and a huge
thank you to all the mentors involved in this edition!

Cheers,
Srishti, Pratyush & Derick (Wikimedia org admins)

*Srishti Sethi*
Developer Advocate
Wikimedia Foundation 
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 


Re: [Wikimedia-l] WMF commitment for a Wikimedia projects archive

2019-05-07 Thread Dan Garry (Deskana)
On Tue 7 May 2019 at 11:04, Fæ  wrote:

> I am sure this Wikimedia wide community run list is a perfectly good place
> to check whether the WMF has any commitment to long term public archives,
> or not.
>
> Thanks for your advice as to where to go, but the strategy process groups
> are undoubtedly a worse place to ask this question and expect a verifiable
> answer.


I see! Then I will defer to your clear expertise in getting definitive
answers. I look forward to seeing the outcome!

Dan
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 


[Wikimedia-l] Now online: Wikimedia Deutschland’s 2018 report to the Wikimedia Movement

2019-05-07 Thread Cornelius Kibelka
Dear fellow Wikimedians,

Below you will find Wikimedia Deutschland’s 2018 report to the Wikimedia
Movement. Since 2017, Wikimedia Deutschland no longer receives movement
funds through the Annual Plan Grant program (via the Funds Dissemination
Committee, FDC). However, as an organization of this movement, we are
committed to sharing annually what we do and what we learn, being
accountable for our financial resources, and checking progress and impact
based on goals and objectives in Wikimedia Deutschland’s Annual Plan.

In this report you will find overviews, stories and descriptions of our
work in 2018 in three fields of action: Volunteers, Technology/ Software
Development and Conditions for Free Knowledge, as well as about our general
support for the Wikimedia movement. You will also find the financial
information for fiscal year 2018. This report for the movement goes out to
all people and affiliates who are interested in learning more about the
work of our chapter. A broader, less detailed view will be provided in our
Annual Report, to be published in the upcoming weeks.

Start page:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Deutschland/Movement_Report_2018

Short URL: w.wiki/35Z

Enjoy reading! If you have any questions or suggestions, please let us know.

Best regards

Cornelius

-- 
Cornelius Kibelka
Internationale Beziehungen | International Relations
Vorstandsteam | Office of the ED

Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24 | 10963 Berlin
Tel. (030) 219 158 26-0
http://wikimedia.de

Stellen Sie sich eine Welt vor, in der jeder Mensch an der Menge allen
Wissens frei teilhaben kann. Helfen Sie uns dabei!
http://spenden.wikimedia.de/

Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e. V.
Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter
der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für
Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/029/42207
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 


Re: [Wikimedia-l] WMF commitment for a Wikimedia projects archive

2019-05-07 Thread Peter Southwood
I too would like to know if there are any answers to this question, and while 
there may be more direct ways to get an answer, I agree that the answer should 
be shared here.
Cheers,
Peter Southwood

-Original Message-
From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of 
Fæ
Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2019 12:04 PM
To: Wikimedia Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] WMF commitment for a Wikimedia projects archive

I am sure this Wikimedia wide community run list is a perfectly good place
to check whether the WMF has any commitment to long term public archives,
or not.

Thanks for your advice as to where to go, but the strategy process groups
are undoubtedly a worse place to ask this question and expect a verifiable
answer.

Fae


On Tue, 7 May 2019, 10:44 Dan Garry (Deskana),  wrote:

> I think the correct venue to ask for such a large, cross-cutting, strategic
> commitment would be with the strategy process working groups, and not this
> mailing list. Did you try engaging with them?
>
> Dan
>
> On Tue, 7 May 2019 at 09:35, Fæ  wrote:
>
> > With all of the strategy discussions still on-going, it would be good
> > to know where the long term public archive of our Wikimedia projects
> > sits within it.
> >
> > As has been mentioned on this list previously, when volunteers donate
> > to the Internet Archive, there is some comfort that their efforts in
> > helping preserve public domain media will be accessible and archived
> > for 100 years.
> >
> > I have been unable to work out what the Wikimedia Foundations
> > commitment is to maintaining a publicly accessible project archive. I
> > may be wrong and would love to have someone post a link that puts me
> > right, but based on past discussions, I suspect that if a project gets
> > closed or mothballed, there is no specific commitment to fund public
> > access to any archives. The WMF may be unable to match the 100 year
> > commitment that the Internet Archive plans for, but it would be jolly
> > nice to have a commitment to something and have that promoted in the
> > long term strategy.
> >
> > The best example I can think of is Wikimedia Commons as this is a
> > significant size, so committing to maintaining a 10 or 20 year archive
> > (not just an operational backup) is not an insignificant thing to find
> > publicly accessible server space for or earmark a specific budget for.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Fae
> > --
> > fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae
> >
> > ___
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > 
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> 
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 



___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 


Re: [Wikimedia-l] WMF commitment for a Wikimedia projects archive

2019-05-07 Thread
I am sure this Wikimedia wide community run list is a perfectly good place
to check whether the WMF has any commitment to long term public archives,
or not.

Thanks for your advice as to where to go, but the strategy process groups
are undoubtedly a worse place to ask this question and expect a verifiable
answer.

Fae


On Tue, 7 May 2019, 10:44 Dan Garry (Deskana),  wrote:

> I think the correct venue to ask for such a large, cross-cutting, strategic
> commitment would be with the strategy process working groups, and not this
> mailing list. Did you try engaging with them?
>
> Dan
>
> On Tue, 7 May 2019 at 09:35, Fæ  wrote:
>
> > With all of the strategy discussions still on-going, it would be good
> > to know where the long term public archive of our Wikimedia projects
> > sits within it.
> >
> > As has been mentioned on this list previously, when volunteers donate
> > to the Internet Archive, there is some comfort that their efforts in
> > helping preserve public domain media will be accessible and archived
> > for 100 years.
> >
> > I have been unable to work out what the Wikimedia Foundations
> > commitment is to maintaining a publicly accessible project archive. I
> > may be wrong and would love to have someone post a link that puts me
> > right, but based on past discussions, I suspect that if a project gets
> > closed or mothballed, there is no specific commitment to fund public
> > access to any archives. The WMF may be unable to match the 100 year
> > commitment that the Internet Archive plans for, but it would be jolly
> > nice to have a commitment to something and have that promoted in the
> > long term strategy.
> >
> > The best example I can think of is Wikimedia Commons as this is a
> > significant size, so committing to maintaining a 10 or 20 year archive
> > (not just an operational backup) is not an insignificant thing to find
> > publicly accessible server space for or earmark a specific budget for.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Fae
> > --
> > fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae
> >
> > ___
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > 
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> 
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 


Re: [Wikimedia-l] WMF commitment for a Wikimedia projects archive

2019-05-07 Thread Dan Garry (Deskana)
I think the correct venue to ask for such a large, cross-cutting, strategic
commitment would be with the strategy process working groups, and not this
mailing list. Did you try engaging with them?

Dan

On Tue, 7 May 2019 at 09:35, Fæ  wrote:

> With all of the strategy discussions still on-going, it would be good
> to know where the long term public archive of our Wikimedia projects
> sits within it.
>
> As has been mentioned on this list previously, when volunteers donate
> to the Internet Archive, there is some comfort that their efforts in
> helping preserve public domain media will be accessible and archived
> for 100 years.
>
> I have been unable to work out what the Wikimedia Foundations
> commitment is to maintaining a publicly accessible project archive. I
> may be wrong and would love to have someone post a link that puts me
> right, but based on past discussions, I suspect that if a project gets
> closed or mothballed, there is no specific commitment to fund public
> access to any archives. The WMF may be unable to match the 100 year
> commitment that the Internet Archive plans for, but it would be jolly
> nice to have a commitment to something and have that promoted in the
> long term strategy.
>
> The best example I can think of is Wikimedia Commons as this is a
> significant size, so committing to maintaining a 10 or 20 year archive
> (not just an operational backup) is not an insignificant thing to find
> publicly accessible server space for or earmark a specific budget for.
>
> Thanks,
> Fae
> --
> fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae
>
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> 
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 


Re: [Wikimedia-l] Who oversees the AffCom?

2019-05-07 Thread Paulo Santos Perneta
Hello Isaac,

Thank's a lot for your message. The affiliate I belong to has already
requested more details on that sanction. However, from the information
already provided, it is directly related to an AffCom resolution dating
back from 8 April 2018, without any relation to me.

For the moment I am not requesting anything to AffCom, as AffCom has not
even had the decency of informing me of the sanction, and I had to know
about it by 3rd parties in a very embarrassing and outrageous situation.
Also, after several situations where the AffCom was caught distorting the
truth, when not blatantly lying, as it is now, always failing to
substantiate their accusations when requested, I do not deem it to be a
trustworthy body - and the fact that AffCom was left unchecked and
unaccountable for years, even empowered to decide itself its own members,
certainly is not alien to this state of affairs. So I'm not presuming good
faith on AFfCom as well, and I'm requesting a formal investigation on this
and former similar situations involving AffCom.

I do not care much about the sanction itself, though it is quite annoying,
especially to my affiliate, but the fact that it was decided in secrecy,
and its blatant fraudulent nature, with false accusations involving my
person, is quite enraging and outrageous.

Best,
Paulo


Isaac Olatunde  escreveu no dia terça, 7/05/2019
à(s) 09:54:

> Hi Paulo,
>
> You said you got your information from a WMF source. Right? Is there no
> possibility for you to ask the same WMF source who to direct this question
> to? Have you tried to ask AffCom, WMF SuSa or the community engagement
> team?
>
> In any case, I wish you all the best.
>
> Isaac
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 6, 2019, 10:20 AM Benjamin Ikuta  wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > I'm not familiar with this specific situation, but I agree that more
> > transparency and accountability would be good.
> >
> >
> >
> > On May 6, 2019, at 12:40 AM, Paulo Santos Perneta <
> paulospern...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > A few days ago the Wikimedia affiliate I belong to was officially
> > informed,
> > > by a WMF source, that I'm being subject to a until now unknown
> sanction,
> > > with an accusation from AffCom I can only describe as baseless and
> > > fraudulent, relating to a a situation between two affiliates, dealt
> with
> > by
> > > AffCom more than one year ago, of which I was never part of, occurred
> > more
> > > than one year ago. I was never informed of this.
> > >
> > > This is not the first time AffCom engages in this sort of appalling
> > > behavior. As far as I know, WMPT is still waiting for the accusations
> > made
> > > by AffCom last year, which led to its suspension, to be substantiated.
> > > AffCom never substantiated anything related to that, with the excuse
> of a
> > > need for secrecy.
> > >
> > > How, I ask you all as members of the Movement, how come the Wikimedia
> > > Movement allowed for such a secretive, arbitrary, apparently unchecked
> > and
> > > very much powerful institution to grow and thrive like this in its
> > middle,
> > > overseeing and effectively controlling the relation of all of us (both
> > > affiliates and individuals) and the WMF?
> > >
> > > More important than that, what can be done about this? Where one can
> > appeal
> > > to, when presented with such fraudulent, baseless, secretive,
> > > unsubstantiated accusations by a body which was supposed to be above
> all
> > > suspicion?
> > >
> > > Can an internal inquiry be demanded somewhere at the Wikimedia
> Foundation
> > > over the activities and decisions of AffCom, in the same way we do with
> > > suspicious activity by checkusers and supervisors, with the Ombudsman
> > > Commission?
> > >
> > > Looking forward for any help and insight on this,
> > >
> > > Paulo - DarwIn
> > > Wikimedia Portugal
> > > ___
> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > 
> >
> > ___
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > 
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Who oversees the AffCom?

2019-05-07 Thread Isaac Olatunde
Hi Paulo,

You said you got your information from a WMF source. Right? Is there no
possibility for you to ask the same WMF source who to direct this question
to? Have you tried to ask AffCom, WMF SuSa or the community engagement team?

In any case, I wish you all the best.

Isaac





On Mon, May 6, 2019, 10:20 AM Benjamin Ikuta 
>
>
> I'm not familiar with this specific situation, but I agree that more
> transparency and accountability would be good.
>
>
>
> On May 6, 2019, at 12:40 AM, Paulo Santos Perneta 
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > A few days ago the Wikimedia affiliate I belong to was officially
> informed,
> > by a WMF source, that I'm being subject to a until now unknown sanction,
> > with an accusation from AffCom I can only describe as baseless and
> > fraudulent, relating to a a situation between two affiliates, dealt with
> by
> > AffCom more than one year ago, of which I was never part of, occurred
> more
> > than one year ago. I was never informed of this.
> >
> > This is not the first time AffCom engages in this sort of appalling
> > behavior. As far as I know, WMPT is still waiting for the accusations
> made
> > by AffCom last year, which led to its suspension, to be substantiated.
> > AffCom never substantiated anything related to that, with the excuse of a
> > need for secrecy.
> >
> > How, I ask you all as members of the Movement, how come the Wikimedia
> > Movement allowed for such a secretive, arbitrary, apparently unchecked
> and
> > very much powerful institution to grow and thrive like this in its
> middle,
> > overseeing and effectively controlling the relation of all of us (both
> > affiliates and individuals) and the WMF?
> >
> > More important than that, what can be done about this? Where one can
> appeal
> > to, when presented with such fraudulent, baseless, secretive,
> > unsubstantiated accusations by a body which was supposed to be above all
> > suspicion?
> >
> > Can an internal inquiry be demanded somewhere at the Wikimedia Foundation
> > over the activities and decisions of AffCom, in the same way we do with
> > suspicious activity by checkusers and supervisors, with the Ombudsman
> > Commission?
> >
> > Looking forward for any help and insight on this,
> >
> > Paulo - DarwIn
> > Wikimedia Portugal
> > ___
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> 
>
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> 
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 


[Wikimedia-l] WMF commitment for a Wikimedia projects archive

2019-05-07 Thread
With all of the strategy discussions still on-going, it would be good
to know where the long term public archive of our Wikimedia projects
sits within it.

As has been mentioned on this list previously, when volunteers donate
to the Internet Archive, there is some comfort that their efforts in
helping preserve public domain media will be accessible and archived
for 100 years.

I have been unable to work out what the Wikimedia Foundations
commitment is to maintaining a publicly accessible project archive. I
may be wrong and would love to have someone post a link that puts me
right, but based on past discussions, I suspect that if a project gets
closed or mothballed, there is no specific commitment to fund public
access to any archives. The WMF may be unable to match the 100 year
commitment that the Internet Archive plans for, but it would be jolly
nice to have a commitment to something and have that promoted in the
long term strategy.

The best example I can think of is Wikimedia Commons as this is a
significant size, so committing to maintaining a 10 or 20 year archive
(not just an operational backup) is not an insignificant thing to find
publicly accessible server space for or earmark a specific budget for.

Thanks,
Fae
-- 
fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae

___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,